This is the single biggest piece of friction in the BFA market. It's also the single biggest reason DIY BFAs fail. This page explains what's required, why, and how we make it easier.
The legal requirement
Under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) — and, for WA de facto couples, the equivalent provisions of the Family Court Act 1997 (WA) — a Binding Financial Agreement is only binding if both parties have obtained independent legal advice from separate lawyers before signing, and each lawyer has signed a certificate confirming the advice was given.
“Separate lawyers” means lawyers at different firms. The same firm cannot act for both parties, even with different lawyers in the same office. The two lawyers must be at completely different companies.
The certificates attach to the BFA as annexures. They are the document that — alongside both parties' signatures — turns the agreement from a piece of paper into a binding legal instrument.
If either certificate is missing, defective, or signed by a lawyer who isn't independent of the other party's lawyer, the agreement can be set aside. Many DIY BFAs get set aside for exactly this reason.
Why the law requires it
The independent legal advice requirement exists to protect both parties from signing something they don't understand or wouldn't have signed with proper advice.
A BFA can include terms that materially disadvantage one party. The law allows it — that's the whole point of a private contract. But because the agreement can be lopsided, there's a procedural safeguard: each party must have had a genuine opportunity to receive advice from their own lawyer, who works for them and only them.
The advice has to be real. It can't be a five-minute over-the-counter signature. The lawyer is required to:
- understand the party's full circumstances
- explain the agreement in detail
- walk through what the party is giving up
- explain the grounds on which the agreement could later be set aside
- explain the risks of signing
- be satisfied the party is signing freely, with a real understanding
If the advice doesn't happen — or doesn't happen properly — the BFA isn't binding.
What the advising lawyer actually does
The advising lawyer's job is to look out for their client, not to facilitate the deal.
A typical advice engagement:
- Initial consultation. The lawyer takes a full background — assets, debts, the relationship, what the party is trying to achieve, what they're worried about.
- Review of the draft BFA. The lawyer reads the agreement against the party's interests, identifies anything unusual or risky, and works out what to advise on.
- Advice meeting. The lawyer walks the party through the agreement clause by clause. Explains what each clause means, what the party is giving up, what the alternatives are, and what could go wrong.
- Written advice letter. The lawyer provides a formal letter confirming what was advised. This goes on the lawyer's file as proof the advice was given.
- Negotiation of amendments (if needed). If the party wants changes, the lawyer raises them with the other side's lawyer.
- Signing. The party signs the BFA, and the lawyer signs the certificate of independent legal advice. The certificate attaches to the BFA.
The whole process can be done over a few weeks. The advice meeting itself is usually one or two consultations.
Who can give the advice
Any qualified Australian lawyer who:
- holds a current practising certificate
- isn't in the same firm as the other party's lawyer
- isn't otherwise conflicted (e.g. doesn't have a prior relationship with the other party)
Family law specialisation isn't strictly required — any practising solicitor can sign the certificate — but in practice, family lawyers are who do this work and who clients should choose. The advice is materially better when it's coming from someone who reads BFAs for a living.
Helping your partner find a lawyer
The biggest practical friction with the ILA requirement is that asking your partner to go and find a lawyer cold is awkward. They have to:
- Research family lawyers
- Compare prices
- Book consultations
- Wait for availability
- Trust someone they haven't met
A lot of BFAs stall here. Not because the parties disagree — because the second party never gets round to finding a lawyer.
Lawcaptain only acts for one party. Your partner needs to engage a different law firm for their independent legal advice — that's both the legal requirement and the reason the advice is genuinely independent.
If your partner doesn't have a lawyer in mind, we can suggest other firms that work on a fixed-fee basis, so the pricing is predictable on their side too. Your partner is free to use any qualified Australian family lawyer — the certificate of advice can come from anyone — but for couples who don't want to spend time shopping around, having a short list of fixed-fee firms to choose from is the quickest way through.
The choice belongs to your partner. We don't push and we don't follow up.
What it costs
The BFA pricing on the website covers drafting and advising one party. The other party engages their own lawyer separately, at their own cost.
Your partner's lawyer sets their own fee — fixed-fee firms typically offer the most predictable pricing. We can suggest fixed-fee firms to your partner if they don't have a lawyer in mind. See the pricing page for our side.
Who pays?
That's between you and your partner. The common arrangements:
- Each party pays their own — most common, particularly for post-separation BFAs.
- One party pays for both — common where one party has significantly more assets to protect, and is willing to cover the other party's legal cost as part of the deal. The other party's advice still has to be genuinely independent — the paying party doesn't get to influence the answer.
- Cost-sharing arrangements — anything you agree.
Can one party pay for the other's advice?
Yes. One party can choose to pay for the other party's independent legal advice. This is common when one party particularly wants the BFA in place and wants to reduce the friction for their partner.
Important: the advice still has to be genuinely independent. The advising lawyer:
- meets the paying-party's partner separately
- takes instructions from that partner, not from the paying party
- gives advice based on that partner's interests
- is free to advise against signing
- supports the partner's right to negotiate amendments or refuse to sign
Paying the bill doesn't buy a particular answer. The lawyer's professional obligations run to their client (the partner), not to whoever's paying.
What if my partner refuses to see a lawyer?
Then a BFA isn't possible. The ILA requirement can't be waived.
If your partner refuses, the options depend on whether you're pre-separation or post-separation:
- Pre-separation — you can't make a BFA without your partner's cooperation. There's no other binding instrument for asset protection while you're together. Options: keep talking, accept that the BFA route is closed for now, or look at whether structural changes (ownership names, trust arrangements) can achieve some of what you wanted.
- Post-separation — consent orders only need one party to have a lawyer. The other party can sign without going to their own lawyer. If your partner is willing to sign consent orders but won't engage a lawyer for a BFA, consent orders are typically the right path. The trade-off: consent orders can't lock out future spousal maintenance claims.
Can the same lawyer act for both parties in a BFA?
No. This is a conflict of interest and would invalidate the BFA. The same lawyer cannot give independent legal advice to two parties whose interests are inherently opposed.
It's also true at the firm level: the same firm cannot act for both parties through different lawyers. The two lawyers must be at completely different firms. Lawcaptain only acts for one party; your partner needs to engage a separate firm.
What about overseas signing?
The independent legal advice doesn't have to be in person. The advice meeting can be by telephone or video call, provided the lawyer is satisfied they've properly given advice and the client understood it. So an overseas client can still get advice from an Australian lawyer.
The physical signing is more logistical — the original document needs to make it to the signer and back. Tell us at the outset if anyone is overseas at the time of signing, and we'll plan for it. The advice itself isn't the obstacle.
Translation and language
If a party doesn't speak English fluently, the ILA process has additional requirements. Either:
- the advice is given in the party's preferred language by a lawyer who speaks it, or
- the advice is given with an accredited interpreter (NAATI-certified) present during the consultation, and the BFA itself is professionally translated and annexed
Without these steps, the BFA carries a higher risk of being set aside on undue-influence or lack-of-understanding grounds. This is typically a Complex BFA situation — flag it at intake.
What if my partner gets advice and wants to change the agreement?
This is exactly what the advice process is for. One round of minor amendments is included in the BFA fixed fee on most of our packages. The amendments get raised by your partner's lawyer with your lawyer; both sides work through them; the BFA is updated; everyone signs the updated version.
If the amendments are substantial — fundamental changes to the deal — the agreement may need to be re-priced. We'll be transparent about that at the point it comes up.
If you and your partner can't agree on amendments, the BFA doesn't get signed. You haven't lost the cost of the draft — you've identified a disagreement that needed identifying. The alternative was signing something that wasn't really agreed.
Why does this matter so much for set-aside risk?
The independent legal advice is the procedural backbone of the BFA. Most BFAs that get set aside fail on procedure, not content.
Procedural failures the courts have set aside agreements over include:
- Certificate of advice missing or defective
- Advice given by a non-independent lawyer
- Advice given by the same firm acting for both parties
- Advice not in writing, or not signed
- Advice rushed or incomplete
- Advice given after signing rather than before
- Translation not provided where required
The substantive deal can be wildly lopsided and still survive set-aside review. Failing on procedure is much easier than failing on substance — and entirely avoidable with proper process.
This is why we don't take shortcuts on the ILA step. The whole agreement depends on it.
Common questions
Can my lawyer recommend an independent lawyer to my partner?
We can share a short list of fixed-fee family law firms your partner can consider, so they have somewhere to start. The final choice is theirs — they're free to use any qualified Australian family lawyer. Independence of the advice is what matters; what we provide is information, not a directed recommendation.
What if I want to use Lawcaptain and my partner doesn't?
That's fine. You engage us for your side; your partner engages their preferred lawyer for theirs. The BFA still gets executed. We exchange the signed certificates with their lawyer at the appropriate point in the process.
Can my partner use a friend who happens to be a lawyer?
Provided that friend is a qualified Australian solicitor with a current practising certificate, isn't conflicted (no prior relationship with you, isn't in your lawyer's firm), and is willing to give real advice — yes. Whether they should is a separate question. A friend with no family-law experience may not be the right person for this work.
What if my partner gets advice but doesn't actually read the agreement?
This is on the advising lawyer to police. Part of the advising lawyer's job is to be satisfied the party has actually understood the agreement. If the lawyer signs the certificate without that confidence, they're putting their own professional indemnity insurance on the line. In practice, advising lawyers walk through the agreement in detail because they have skin in the game on getting the advice right.
How long does the advice phase add to the BFA timeline?
It depends on the other lawyer's availability and how many rounds of amendments come up. For a straightforward matter the advice phase is generally a few weeks; for more complex matters it can take longer.
What if my partner's lawyer is slow to engage?
This is a common cause of timeline drift. Once you engage Lawcaptain, you can ask your partner to engage their lawyer in parallel — there's no need to wait until the draft is finished. We'll send the draft to their lawyer when ready; if they're already engaged and have done their initial work, the advice phase moves faster.
What if we're using consent orders instead?
Consent orders don't have the same ILA requirement. Only the engaging party needs a lawyer. The other party can review the draft, sign, and let the orders be lodged without ever going to their own lawyer (though many do, briefly, just for a sanity check).
The trade-offs:
- Consent orders are cheaper because only one lawyer is involved.
- Consent orders go through court review for fairness — that's the protective mechanism that takes the place of the ILA requirement on a BFA.
- Consent orders are less private — they form part of the court record.
- Consent orders can't lock out future spousal maintenance.
For most separating couples, consent orders are the right answer. The BFA is the right answer when you need privacy, when the deal is outside what a court would approve, or when you need the spousal maintenance set-off.
(See Divorce vs property settlement and Consent orders FAQ for the bigger picture.)
Still have questions?
Talk to our AI agent, or get in touch with our team. Free discussion, no obligation.