HomeIndustrial hubWA nurses and midwivesBargaining, and what is happening now
Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA) · Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)

Bargaining for WA nurses and midwives, and what is happening now.

How agreements are made in each system, what each allows by way of industrial action, and the public record of the ratio rollout and the 2027 rounds. No view on any outcome.

11 October 2027WAH042 and the Ramsay WA agreement reach nominal expiry
12 December 2027the St John of God agreement reaches nominal expiry
Noneprotected industrial action in the WA state system
Nurses seated in a meeting room listen to one speaker

Next expiry 11 October 2027: WAH042 and the Ramsay WA registered nurses’ agreement reach their nominal expiry. Each continues to operate until it is replaced (WAH042 cl 5(1)–(2)).

Key dates

DateWhatSource
11 October 2027WAH042 reaches its nominal expiry date; it continues in force until replacedWAH042 cl 5(1)–(2)
11 October 2027The Ramsay WA registered nurses' and midwives' agreement (AE529165) reaches its nominal expiry dateAE529165 cl 3.2
12 October 2027The Department of Justice nurses' agreement (DEP187) reaches its nominal expiry dateDEP187 cl 5(1)
12 December 2027The St John of God registered nurses' and midwives' agreement (AE530159) reaches its nominal expiry dateAE530159 cl 3(1)
11 October 2027What: WAH042 reaches its nominal expiry date; it continues in force until replaced
11 October 2027What: The Ramsay WA registered nurses' and midwives' agreement (AE529165) reaches its nominal expiry date
Source
AE529165 cl 3.2
12 October 2027What: The Department of Justice nurses' agreement (DEP187) reaches its nominal expiry date
12 December 2027What: The St John of God registered nurses' and midwives' agreement (AE530159) reaches its nominal expiry date

Part A: bargaining for WA Health nurses in the WA state system

WA Health nurses are employed by health service providers, which are agents of the State (Health Services Act 2016 (WA) s 33). WA has not referred its industrial relations powers to the Commonwealth, so these nurses are in the WA state system. The rules below come from the IR Act. The same rules apply to the Justice nurses' agreement, DEP187.

Who bargains

The parties to WAH042 are the state union and the employers it lists: the Director General of the Department of Health, the health service providers and the Mental Health Commission (cl 4(2)–(3)). On the employers' side, the Department's chief executive manages "WA health system-wide industrial relations on behalf of the State, including the negotiation of industrial agreements" (HSA s 20(1)(f)).

WAH042 has no clause fixing when talks for its replacement open. The Justice agreement commits the parties to open negotiations "at least six months prior to the expiry" (DEP187 cl 5(3)).

Industrial agreements, and what happens after expiry

An industrial agreement is an agreement about industrial matters between a union and an employer, registered by the Commission (s 41(1)–(2)). It must specify a nominal expiry date no later than 3 years after it comes into operation (s 41A(1)(a)).

After that date it "continues in force" for all parties, except any party that retires from it, until a new agreement or an award is made in its place (s 41(6)). A party may retire by filing a notice of intention to retire at any time after expiry, or up to 30 days before; it stops being a party 30 days after filing (s 41(7)). WAH042 itself says it "will continue in force until replaced by a new agreement" (cl 5(2)).

WAH042 is comprehensive and "applies to the exclusion of any Award" (cl 6(1)). So no award sits underneath it, and pay generally changes only through a new or varied agreement, an arbitrated term or an enterprise order.

Bargaining and the duty of good faith

A union or an employer starts the formal process by written notice to the other party (s 42(1)). Bargaining is initiated when the other party replies, within 21 days, that it will bargain (s 42A(1), (6)). While an agreement is in force, the notice cannot be given earlier than 90 days before its nominal expiry date (s 42(5)).

Each negotiating party "must bargain in good faith" (s 42B(1)). Good faith includes, among other things (the letters are the Act's) (s 42B(2)):

(a) stating and explaining your position on the matters at issue;

(b) meeting at reasonable times, intervals and places for face-to-face bargaining;

(c) disclosing relevant and necessary information;

(d) acting honestly and openly, including "not capriciously adding or withdrawing items";

(g) "bargaining genuinely and dedicating sufficient resources to ensure this occurs".

Good faith does not require a party to agree to any term, or to make an agreement at all (s 42D). The Commission may make orders to ensure the parties bargain in good faith (s 42E), but it cannot make a party enter an agreement or put a term in it (s 42F).

When the parties cannot agree

There are three routes in the IR Act.

(a) Arbitration of the unagreed terms. Where the parties have agreed some, but not all, of an agreement, they may jointly ask the Commission to decide the rest (s 42G). This has happened for WA Health nurses: in 2014 the Commission arbitrated a number of clauses of the 2013 nurses' agreement under s 42G (The Minister for Health v Australian Nursing Federation, Industrial Union of Workers Perth [2014] WAIRC 00818 at [1]).

(b) A declaration that bargaining has ended. A single commissioner may declare that bargaining has ended if satisfied that the applicant has bargained in good faith, that bargaining has failed, and that there is no reasonable prospect of agreement (s 42H(1)). No appeal lies from the declaration (s 42H(2)).

(c) An enterprise order. After a declaration, the negotiating party named in it may apply within 21 days for an enterprise order (s 42I(2)–(3)). The Commission may then make an order providing for any matter that might otherwise be in an industrial agreement and that it "considers is fair and reasonable in all of the circumstances" (s 42I(1)(c)–(d)). An enterprise order must expire no more than 2 years after it comes into operation (s 42K(2)).

The Commission can also help short of these routes. In 2016, with the WA Health employers offering 1.5% in line with the wages policy and a s 42H declaration foreshadowed, the Commission convened conferences and issued a recommendation about how the dispute should progress (Child and Adolescent Health Service v Australian Nursing Federation Industrial Union of Workers Perth [2016] WAIRC 00783). The agreement was registered later that year (Child and Adolescent Health Service v Australian Nursing Federation Industrial Union of Workers Perth [2016] WAIRC 00841).

The wages policy, and what the Commission must weigh

The WA Government sets its bargaining position through a public sector wages policy. The Public Sector Wages Policy Statement 2026, issued on 26 May 2026, applies to WA public sector industrial agreements, except that the 2023 statement "continues to apply to industrial agreements that expired before 6 May 2026" (PSWPS 2026 cl 4–5). WAH042 expires after that date, so its replacement falls under the 2026 statement. The statement:

(a) states no percentage cap. In making offers the Government will "place specific emphasis on delivering financially sustainable outcomes that are reasonable in the context of each negotiation" (cl 6(a));

(b) gives priority to initiatives supporting attraction and retention, regional service delivery and "direct and permanent employment as the preferred mode of employment" (cl 7);

(c) makes a new agreement apply from registration, with retrospective wage increases to the expiry of the previous agreement something the Government "may consider" (cl 9);

(d) does not apply a new agreement to employees who leave before it is registered (cl 10).

The policy is the Government's position, not a rule for the Commission. But when the Commission arbitrates terms or makes an enterprise order binding a public sector employer, it must consider any applicable wages policy statement, the State's financial position and the employer's budget (s 26(2A)–(2B)). These are "in addition to" the general economic factors in s 26(1)(d) (s 26(2C)). The Commission in Court Session has said that the Act "does not make s 26(2A) a standard against which the other considerations are to be assessed. Nor is s 26(2A) of greater weight than those matters in s 26(1)(d)" (The Minister for Health v Health Services Union of Western Australia (Union of Workers) [2015] WAIRC 00332 at [123], a WA Health case for another union).

Disputes during the life of the agreement

WAH042's dispute procedure runs from the manager, to the manager's superior, to the Chief Executive, and then to the WAIRC "for conciliation and arbitration" (cl 73(2)). Until the matter is decided, "work will continue normally", unless an employee has "a reasonable concern about an imminent risk to their health and safety" (cl 73(1)(b)). Ratio disputes have their own four-stage procedure (cl 10(9)).

The Commission's everyday tool is the compulsory conference (s 44). It may make interim orders to "prevent the deterioration of industrial relations" until the matter is resolved, or to enable conciliation or arbitration to resolve it (s 44(6)(ba)(i)–(ii)). In a Full Bench decision, the Acting President said these orders are not governed by the courts' injunction principles, and the other members agreed on that point (The Director General, Department of Education v The State School Teachers' Union of WA (Inc) [2011] WAIRC 00058 at [57], [93], [122]). She added that they "are not confined to making orders to maintain the status quo" ([58]).

An agreement's entitlements are enforced in the Industrial Magistrates Court (s 83), which can order underpayments repaid, generally for up to 6 years (s 83A).

Industrial action in the WA system

"Industrial action" is defined widely: any act or omission by a union, employer, employee or anyone else for the purpose, "or in the opinion of the Commission for the purpose", of compelling acceptance of terms of employment or enforcing a demand about employment (s 7(1)).

The IR Act has no scheme of protected industrial action. Three provisions bear on it:

(a) the Commission may determine that industrial action is a breach of the duty to bargain in good faith (s 42B(3));

(b) an employer facing action can ask for a compulsory conference and an interim order under s 44(6)(ba) that the action stop;

(c) if a s 44 order is not complied with, the Registrar, at the Commission's direction, may apply to the Full Bench (s 84A(1)(b)). If the breach is proved, the Full Bench may accept an undertaking, issue a caution, impose a penalty of up to $13,000, or direct the Registrar to issue a summons about the union's registration (s 84A(5)(a); s 73(1)).

Part B: bargaining for private hospital and aged care nurses under the Fair Work Act

Private hospital operators, including those running Joondalup Health Campus and St John of God Midland Public Hospital, and most aged care providers are national system employers, as constitutional corporations (FW Act s 14(1)(a)). Their agreements are made under the FW Act.

Enterprise agreements

Most private hospital nurses are under a single-enterprise agreement with their employer (s 172(2)). The Fair Work Commission must approve it if, among other things, it has been "genuinely agreed to by the employees covered by the agreement" and "passes the better off overall test" against the modern award (s 186(2)(a), (d)). For nurses that award is usually the Nurses Award 2020; for assistants in nursing in residential aged care, the Aged Care Award 2010.

A union that was a bargaining representative is covered by the agreement if it gives notice under s 183 and the Commission notes this in its approval decision (s 201(2)). The St John of God agreement, for example, covers the ANMF WA Branch (AE530159 cl 2(2); Application by St John of God Health Care Inc [2025] FWCA 2808 at [6]).

A federal agreement keeps operating after its nominal expiry date until it is replaced or terminated.

Supported bargaining, and aged care

Several employers can bargain together for a multi-enterprise agreement. Under supported bargaining, the Commission must authorise this where it is "appropriate" for the employers and employees to bargain together, having regard to prevailing pay and conditions "including whether low rates of pay prevail", the employers' common interests and whether the process would be manageable, and where at least some employees are union-represented (s 243(1)). One example of a common interest is "being substantially funded, directly or indirectly, by the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory" (s 243(2)(c)), which describes much of aged care. When we searched the Commission's agreements on 3 November 2026 we found no supported bargaining agreement covering WA aged care.

When bargaining is intractable

A bargaining representative may apply for an intractable bargaining declaration (s 234). The Commission may make one only after the minimum bargaining period, which, where an agreement already applies, is the later of 9 months after its nominal expiry date and 9 months after bargaining starts (s 235(1), (5)). It must be satisfied that it has dealt with the dispute and the applicant took part, that there is "no reasonable prospect of agreement being reached" without a declaration, and that a declaration is reasonable in all the circumstances (s 235(2)).

The Commission must then make an intractable bargaining workplace determination (s 269). Certain terms of it, other than wage increases, must be not less favourable to the employees than the terms of their existing agreement (s 270A(2), (4)).

Protected industrial action, and its limits for nurses

Unlike the WA system, the FW Act allows protected industrial action during bargaining. For action to be protected:

(a) the employees must have voted for it in a protected action ballot (s 409(2)), and notice of the action cannot be given until the ballot results are declared (s 414(3));

(b) the union must be "genuinely trying to reach an agreement" (s 413(3));

(c) written notice of at least 3 working days must be given for a single-enterprise agreement, specifying the nature of the action and when it will start (s 414(1)–(2), (6));

(d) the action must not be taken before the existing agreement passes its nominal expiry date (s 413(6), referring to s 417).

Protected action in health care meets a firm limit. The Commission "must" suspend or terminate protected action if satisfied it has threatened, is threatening, or would threaten "to endanger the life, the personal safety or health, or the welfare, of the population or of part of it" (s 424(1)(c)). It may act on its own initiative or on application by a bargaining representative or the federal Minister (s 424(2)). A State Minister may apply only if the State is a referring State (s 424(2)(iia)), which WA is not, because it has not referred its industrial relations powers (see s 30B). The Commission must decide an application within 5 days as far as practicable, or else suspend the action in the meantime (s 424(3)–(4)).

The Commission must also suspend protected action that is threatening to cause significant harm to a third party, on the application of someone directly affected or the Minister (s 426).

Disputes during the life of a federal agreement

Each agreement has its own dispute clause. The St John of God agreement runs from the supervisor, to a senior St John of God representative, to St John of God, and then to the Fair Work Commission for conciliation and, if still unresolved, arbitration (AE530159 cl 52). Its workload grievance goes to the nurse manager and then the Director of Nursing before the dispute procedure (cl 54(7)–(8)).

Part C: what is happening now (as at 3 November 2026)

This part describes only what is on the public record. It takes no side and makes no prediction. It will be updated when something new is published.

Read moreShow less

The ratio rollout at WA Health

What the agreement and policy say:

(a) WAH042 commits the employer to "introducing minimum nurse/midwife to patient ratios via a phased approach over a minimum of two years" (cl 10(1)), each phase to be implemented "without unreasonable delay" once it is determined (cl 10(6)). The agreement names no dates and no numbers;

(b) the numbers and the wards are set by WA Health policy MP 0187/24, which applies to specified wards in the metropolitan health service providers, not WA Country Health Service, and says "AINs must not be included in the ratio" (MP 0187/24 3.2.2). The policy was last amended on 20 October 2026;

(c) the Nursing Hours per Patient Day clause is to be removed from the replacement agreement when the rollout is complete, as determined by the ratio Taskforce (cl 12(2)).

What has been reported, by the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Journal on 14 September 2026 (ANMJ):

(a) ratios began with a pilot at the Perth Children's Hospital emergency department in July 2023, then medical and surgical wards at Sir Charles Gairdner and Osborne Park hospitals in October 2024;

(b) from July 2025 they extended to metropolitan medical and surgical wards at eight hospitals, with, as the ANMJ reports it, one nurse to four patients plus a shift coordinator on morning and afternoon shifts and one nurse to seven patients at night;

(c) a further phase began in February 2026 in metropolitan critical care areas;

(d) in September 2026 the State Government announced that the next stage, which the union said would have introduced ratios on more than 80 Perth wards and in the remaining metropolitan emergency departments, was delayed, with no new start date. The union said it was not consulted and launched a petition.

The 2027 bargaining rounds

Four nurses' agreements in WA reach their nominal expiry within about two months of each other:

AgreementSystemNominal expiry
WAH042, WA Health registered nurses and midwivesWA state11 October 2027
AE529165, Ramsay WA registered nurses and midwivesFair Work11 October 2027
DEP187, Department of Justice nursesWA state12 October 2027
AE530159, St John of God registered nurses and midwivesFair Work12 December 2027
WAH042, WA Health registered nurses and midwivesSystem: WA state
Nominal expiry
11 October 2027
AE529165, Ramsay WA registered nurses and midwivesSystem: Fair Work
Nominal expiry
11 October 2027
DEP187, Department of Justice nursesSystem: WA state
Nominal expiry
12 October 2027
AE530159, St John of God registered nurses and midwivesSystem: Fair Work
Nominal expiry
12 December 2027

No log of claims for these rounds was public on 3 November 2026. On the current statement, the WA Health and Justice rounds fall under the Public Sector Wages Policy Statement 2026, which states no percentage cap (see Part A). For the two Fair Work agreements, protected action is not available before their nominal expiry dates (FW Act s 413(6)).

Federal agreements past their nominal expiry

These WA agreements covering the union had passed their nominal expiry dates, and no replacement was found on the Commission's register on 3 November 2026. Each keeps operating until replaced or terminated:

AgreementNominal expiry
Silver Chain registered and enrolled nurses (AE527424)30 June 2026
Bethanie Group registered nurses (AE525235)30 June 2026
Mount Hospital registered nurses (AE520367)30 June 2026
Opal HealthCare (WA) (AE527298)30 September 2026
Aurora Healthcare (WA Private Hospitals) (AE522291)30 June 2025
SwanCare Group nurses (AE521250)30 June 2025
Silver Chain registered and enrolled nurses (AE527424)Nominal expiry: 30 June 2026
Bethanie Group registered nurses (AE525235)Nominal expiry: 30 June 2026
Mount Hospital registered nurses (AE520367)Nominal expiry: 30 June 2026
Opal HealthCare (WA) (AE527298)Nominal expiry: 30 September 2026
Show all 6 rowsShow fewer
Aurora Healthcare (WA Private Hospitals) (AE522291)Nominal expiry: 30 June 2025
SwanCare Group nurses (AE521250)Nominal expiry: 30 June 2025

The Commission's search shows approved agreements, not applications awaiting approval, so a replacement may be in progress.

Award rates for nurses outside aged care

Aged care nurses received work value increases under the Nurses Award 2020 in three tranches, the last on 1 August 2026 (Applications by Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation [2024] FWCFB 452 at [65]). The ANMF's application for a work value increase for nurses outside aged care, AM2024/11, is described in Applications by ANMF [2024] FWCFB 452 at [7] and [71]. We found no final decision in it on 3 November 2026.

For unions and industrial officers

The same research agent can work through your members' agreement, its history in the Commission, and the decisions on it.

Decided cases

What the Commission and the courts decided.

Published decisions, retold in plain English from the decision itself. Each links to the full text. Lawcaptain did not act in these cases.

Parking clause invalidSupreme Court of Western Australia · 21 July 2015

A parking fee clause arbitrated into the nurses' agreement was invalid, but on narrow grounds

When the 2013 WA Health nurses' agreement was finalised, the Commission arbitrated a clause fixing staff parking at the big Perth hospitals at $5.50 a day. The Ministers went to the Supreme Court. The clause fell because it purported to set the fees themselves, including for a body that was not the employer.

Read the full storyShow less

In 2013 the union and the Minister for Health agreed most of a replacement agreement, and jointly asked the Commission to decide the terms they could not agree, including the union's parking claim ([10]-[11], [14]-[15]). This is the arbitration route in s 42G of the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA). On 16 October 2014 the Commission ordered that the agreement include cl 67: parking at Category A hospitals would be $5.50 a day, increased each 1 July by Perth CPI ([20]). Category A covers Royal Perth, Sir Charles Gairdner, Fiona Stanley and Perth Children's hospitals ([21]). The agreement was registered with the clause ([22]).

The Ministers asked the Supreme Court to quash the clause ([1]). Beech J read cl 67 as setting the fees themselves, not just regulating what the employer must bear between employer and employee ([62]-[65]). On that reading the clause purported to control the fees charged by the Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre Trust, which was not an employer and not a party, and the Commission had no power to do that; the union conceded the point ([67]-[69]). The union also conceded that, on that reading, the clause was invalid for every Category A hospital ([70], [73]-[75]).

On the wider questions the union won. The Court rejected the Ministers' argument that every term ordered into an agreement under s 42G must itself be about an "industrial matter": the foundation of s 42G is the consent of both parties, and orders can be made only on the matters they specify ([87], [90], [92]-[93]). On the union's narrower reading the clause would have been valid ([95]), because parking costs of shift workers who must drive to Category A hospitals affect their salary and are an industrial matter ([98]-[99]).

A s 42G order cannot be appealed within the Commission ([102]), so the challenge was brought in the Supreme Court. The Court made a declaration rather than issuing certiorari ([105]-[107]), declaring cl 67 invalid (Hames [2015] WASC 247 (S) at [2]). Because the issues the union won "were significant" and took most of the argument, but the Ministers had succeeded, the union was ordered to pay 50% of their costs (Hames [2015] WASC 247 (S) at [13]-[14], [16]).

In the decision's words: "it is one thing to order inclusion of a provision governing the position regarding payment of or for parking fees as between employer and employee. It is a quite different thing, of a fundamentally different character, to dictate or purport to dictate how those charged with responsibility for fixing parking fees near a place of employment must discharge that responsibility." ([74]).

What it means for you

When the parties to a WA public sector agreement jointly refer unagreed terms to the Commission, its power covers only the matters they specify ([90]). An arbitrated term can regulate what the employer pays or reimburses its employees, but not dictate how whoever sets the parking fees, including the employer itself, sets them ([70], [74]). Parking costs for shift workers who have to drive to work can be an industrial matter ([99]).

Outcome: For the Ministers: the parking clause was declared invalid. The union, which argued the case against the Ministers, won the wider points about the Commission's arbitration power and was ordered to pay 50% of the Ministers' costs.

Won in part by the unionWAIRC, Commission in Court Session · 23 April 2015

Public sector pay arbitration: the wages policy must be considered, but it is not the yardstick (not a nurse case)

WA Health's administrative, clerical, technical and allied health staff could not agree their pay rises with the Department, so the two sides asked the Commission to decide within agreed ranges. The State relied on its wages policy and the budget. The Commission gave more than the policy figure, partly because nurses and doctors had received more.

Read the full storyShow less

The parties registered the 2014 agreement on 8 December 2014 but could not agree the salary increases. Under s 42G of the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA) they asked the Commission to set them, the first between 2.75% and 4% from 1 July 2014, the second between 2.5% and 5% from 1 July 2015 ([1]). The Minister sought 2.75% and 2.5%, which he said would roughly match the forecast Consumer Price Index ([4]). The union, which said it represented more than 16,000 staff, sought increases comparable to the roughly 4% received by doctors, nurses and support staff ([9]-[10]).

This was the first time the Commission had to apply s 26(2A), which requires it, in a public sector decision, to consider the wages policy and the State's and the agency's finances ([2], [118]). The Commission held that s 26(2A) is not "a standard against which the other considerations are to be assessed", nor of greater weight than the factors in s 26(1)(d); each consideration gets its own weight ([123]).

The union had shown a past general consistency of increases between its members and registered nurses, doctors and support workers ([124]). Applying the 2014 policy to these staff, when the nurses and doctors they worked beside had received larger rises under the 2009 policy, meant they were contributing more to the State's fiscal recovery than the colleagues they worked beside, which "is inequitable" ([126]-[127]). Some productivity improvement was also shown ([130]). Against that, the State faced its most difficult fiscal environment for many years ([131]-[133]), and other public sector groups had settled within the policy ([134]).

The Commission concluded the union "has not had a fair go" and that fairness required more than projected CPI ([135]). It set increases of 3.75% and 3% ([138]), with a marginal cost to the Department and a negligible effect on the State's economy ([139]). It added that, in that fiscal environment, arbitrated increases above projected CPI "should be the exception rather than the rule" ([136]).

In the decision's words: "The legislation does not make s 26(2A) a standard against which the other considerations are to be assessed. Nor is s 26(2A) of greater weight than those matters in s 26(1)(d)." ([123]).

What it means for you

In any arbitration of WA public sector pay, including nurses' pay, the Commission must consider the government's wages policy and the State's finances, but they do not override the other considerations in s 26 ([122]-[123]). Comparisons with other groups in the same workforce, and productivity changes, can carry weight ([124]-[130], [135]). The case describes how the Commission weighed the factors in 2015; it says nothing about any current round.

Outcome: Won in part by the union (the HSUWA): increases of 3.75% from 1 July 2014 and 3% from 1 July 2015, against the Minister's 2.75% and 2.5%.

Order quashedAustralian Industrial Relations Commission Full Bench · 2 March 2005

WA public hospital nurses' bargaining in the federal era: an order ending bargaining periods was quashed for unfairness

In 2004, while WA public hospital nurses were under a federal agreement, the Minister for Health had the bargaining periods ended on the ground that it was not genuinely trying to reach agreement. The member who made the order relied on his own impressions of the union from conciliation he had chaired. The Full Bench quashed the order.

Read the full storyShow less

Nurses in the WA public sector were then employed under the Nurses' (WA Government Health Services) Agreement 2001, which reached its nominal expiry date on 1 May 2004, and hospital boards had been cut from 75 to 4 ([2]). Both sides started bargaining periods, and the union took protected industrial action against two hospital boards ([2]). After conciliation, Deputy President McCarthy terminated the union's bargaining periods under s 170MW(2)(a) and (b) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth), on the grounds that the union had not genuinely tried, and was not genuinely trying, to reach agreement ([3]-[4]).

The Full Bench accepted that conduct in conciliation might in some cases be taken into account under that section ([6], [8]). But here the Deputy President had relied on his own observations of the union's conduct in conferences he had chaired ([9]), and neither party had referred to what happened in conciliation at the hearing ([10]). The union therefore had no chance to challenge conclusions that were "very influential" in the decision ([10]). He should have told the union of those conclusions; not doing so denied it a fair hearing, so he failed to exercise the jurisdiction ([11]). The Full Bench added that on the evidence he would otherwise have been entitled to make the findings ([12]). It quashed the order and reserved further orders ([13]).

In the decision's words: "The Deputy President should have alerted the ANF to the conclusions he had reached concerning the conduct of the ANF, and in particular its secretary, during conciliation." ([11]).

What it means for you

A tribunal that relies on its own impressions from conciliation must give the party a chance to answer them ([10]-[11]). The win was procedural: the Full Bench said the findings were otherwise open ([12]). The Act and the federal instruments involved are history; WA Health nurses now bargain in the WA system, and nurses at private hospitals and in aged care bargain under the Fair Work Act.

Outcome: Won by the union: the order terminating the bargaining periods was quashed; further orders were reserved.

Show more case studies (1)(1)Show fewer
Questions

The things people ask.

Does the WA Health nurses' agreement stop applying when it expires in October 2027?

No. WAH042 "will continue in force until replaced by a new agreement" (cl 5(2)), and under s 41(6) of the IR Act an expired industrial agreement continues in force for all parties, except any that retire from it, until a new agreement or award replaces it.

Can WA Health nurses take protected industrial action?

No. The IR Act has no scheme of protected action. Industrial action is defined widely (s 7(1)), the Commission may treat it as a breach of good faith bargaining (s 42B(3)), and an employer can seek a s 44 order to stop it. Breach of such an order can be enforced before the Full Bench, with a penalty of up to $13,000 for each contravention or a direction to issue a summons about the union's registration (s 84A(5), s 73(1)).

Can private hospital nurses strike?

They can take protected action during bargaining for a new agreement, once the old agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, after a protected action ballot and written notice (FW Act ss 409, 413, 414). The Fair Work Commission must suspend or terminate the action if it threatens to endanger the life, personal safety or health, or welfare of the population or part of it (s 424(1)(c)).

Does the wages policy decide what WA Health nurses are paid?

It sets the Government's bargaining position. The 2026 statement states no percentage cap and asks for "financially sustainable outcomes that are reasonable in the context of each negotiation" (cl 6(a)). If the Commission arbitrates or makes an enterprise order, it must consider the policy and the State's finances (IR Act s 26(2A)), but these are in addition to the other economic factors, and the Commission has said s 26(2A) is not "a standard against which the other considerations are to be assessed" (The Minister for Health v Health Services Union of Western Australia (Union of Workers) [2015] WAIRC 00332 at [123]).

Will a new WA Health agreement be backdated?

Under the 2026 wages policy a new agreement applies from registration, and the Government "may consider retrospective wage increases up to the expiry of any previous agreement" in the context of good faith bargaining (cl 9). It does not apply to employees who leave before the agreement is registered (cl 10). WAH042's own first pay step ran from 12 October 2024, although it was registered on 19 February 2025 (cl 17(1); The Director General, Department of Health v The Australian Nursing Federation Industrial Union of Workers Perth [2025] WAIRC 00098).

Are nurse-to-patient ratios guaranteed by the agreement?

The agreement guarantees a commitment and a process: ratios phased in over at least two years, each phase implemented "without unreasonable delay", and a dispute procedure once ratios are in place on a ward (WAH042 cl 10). The ratio numbers and the wards in scope are set by WA Health policy MP 0187/24, not by the agreement.

What happens if bargaining for a WA Health agreement breaks down?

The parties can jointly ask the Commission to arbitrate the terms they cannot agree (IR Act s 42G). Or a party that has bargained in good faith can ask the Commission to declare that bargaining has ended (s 42H), and then apply within 21 days for an enterprise order, which the Commission makes on terms it considers fair and reasonable and which lasts no more than two years (ss 42I, 42K).

Is there a multi-employer agreement for WA aged care nurses?

We found none on 3 November 2026. Aged care nurses in WA are under their own provider's agreement, where there is one, or otherwise the Nurses Award 2020. The FW Act allows supported bargaining across employers, and being substantially government funded is one of the Act's examples of a common interest (s 243(2)(c)).

More for WA nurses and midwives

We use our software to generate this content with AI assistance. General information about the law, not legal advice. Last checked 3 November 2026.