Case study · Restraints and confidentiality

He told his cruise clients he had moved. A court said stop, for now

Barred from soliciting old clients until 7 August 2026 (interim)Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) · 10 April 2026
A travel agent hesitates over a ringing phone beside a model cruise ship and a wall of cruise brochures.

Matthew Kensett sold Silversea cruises directly to customers as a private cruise consultant from December 2016, on a base salary of $61,069 under his latest contract, plus commission. That contract, signed in December 2024, barred him for 12 months after leaving from contacting clients with a view to them moving their business, and from using confidential client information. His employment ended on 7 August 2025. In about October 2025 he joined Savenio, a travel agency that also sells Silversea cruises and is paid commission by Silversea for doing so.

Mr Kensett had brought his own case against Silversea, claiming it dismissed him for exercising a workplace right. Silversea answered with a cross-claim that he had misused its confidential client information and solicited its clients. He accepted that he had contacted a fair number of them to say he had moved and could help them, and over 30 bookings were made through him, but he said none of this breached his contract.

Judge Zipser made interim orders and did not decide the case finally. At this stage, the judge said, Silversea had a comparatively strong case. Client contact details were arguably confidential under his contract even if he remembered them, and telling clients he was 'available to assist them' looked like soliciting. On Silversea's evidence, each cruise booked through an agency instead of its own consultants cost it more. Mr Kensett could keep working at Savenio; he just could not chase those clients.

He was restrained until 7 August 2026 from soliciting clients he had dealt with in his last year, but allowed to keep servicing bookings already made. A month later the court added more clients to that exception, and warned that taking a booking from a client who contacted him first might still breach the orders. It refused Silversea's bid for its costs: without a lawyer, he had not acted unreasonably in standing his ground.

What it means for you

A message to former clients saying you have moved and are happy to help can itself be soliciting. If your contract has a non-solicitation clause, it is worth getting advice before contacting anyone, and taking care even when clients reach out to you first.

These were interim orders; the court had not decided the case finally. The ban on soliciting clients ended on 7 August 2026; the order against using Silversea's confidential information ran until further order. Mr Kensett's own claims, including that he was dismissed for exercising a workplace right, had not been decided. The variation and costs ruling is Kensett v Silversea Cruises Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2026] FedCFamC2G 790 (8 May 2026).

A published decision of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2), retold in plain English. Lawcaptain did not act in this case. Every outcome depends on its own facts. General information, not legal advice about your situation.

Free discussion · no obligation

Talk to us.

Call 1300 967 552, or leave your details and we will call you.

More case studies

Restraints and confidentiality