HomeIndustrial hubWA teachersWorkload, safety and injury
TEA007 award cl 13–14 · SCH013 cl 9, 12, 34 · WES337 cl 16

Too much work, too many students, or hurt at work? What the agreements and the law say.

Teaching hours, DOTT, class sizes and the right to disconnect, how to raise a workload concern, what a school can do about threatening parents, your safety rights, and how a workers’ compensation claim runs.

21 h 20 minthe most face to face teaching a week, under the award
3 weeksto lodge a formal grievance, for example about a class above Table A
12 monthsto make a workers’ compensation claim
A teacher marks a pile of exercise books late at night at a kitchen table

Class sizes Schools “are to plan not to exceed” the Table A class sizes. They are planning targets, not caps, and a teacher asked to take a larger class can use the grievance procedure (SCH013 cl 12.2, 12.4).

Who this page covers

Who you work forSystemInstrumentCovered here?
Department of Education (public schools, including government pre-school centres)WASCH013, read with the TEA007 awardYes
A WA TAFE college (North Metropolitan, South Metropolitan, Central Regional, North Regional, South Regional), or the Department of Training and Workforce DevelopmentWAWES337, read with the TAFE lecturers' award (TEA008) and the Community Colleges Award (COM003)Yes
A non-government (Catholic or independent) schoolGenerally the Fair Work system; not covered by this guide (these teachers are outside the SSTUWA's rules)Not covered by this guideNot yet covered by this guide. The WHS Act and WCIM Act parts below apply to these employers too, but the agreement clauses and the School Education Act powers (which are for government schools) do not
A community collegeWA (on the current record); the employer of any community college teacher today is not establishedCOM003Not yet covered by this guide
Department of Education (public schools, including government pre-school centres)System: WA
Instrument
SCH013, read with the TEA007 award
Covered here?
Yes
A WA TAFE college (North Metropolitan, South Metropolitan, Central Regional, North Regional, South Regional), or the Department of Training and Workforce DevelopmentSystem: WA
Instrument
WES337, read with the TAFE lecturers' award (TEA008) and the Community Colleges Award (COM003)
Covered here?
Yes
A non-government (Catholic or independent) schoolSystem: Generally the Fair Work system; not covered by this guide (these teachers are outside the SSTUWA's rules)
Instrument
Not covered by this guide
Covered here?
Not yet covered by this guide. The WHS Act and WCIM Act parts below apply to these employers too, but the agreement clauses and the School Education Act powers (which are for government schools) do not
A community collegeSystem: WA (on the current record); the employer of any community college teacher today is not established
Instrument
COM003
Covered here?
Not yet covered by this guide

Key time limits

StepTime limitSource
Lodge a formal grievance (schools), for example about a class size above Table AWithin three weeks of the circumstances that give rise to it; the committee has a discretion to accept a later grievance, for example after sick leave or failed informal attempts, if you give written reasons for the delaySCH013 cl 55.6(b)(i)–(ii)
Level One (school) committee considers the grievanceWithin five working days of receiving itcl 55.8(a)
Take an unresolved grievance to Level Two (regional committee)Within five working days of being told Level One could not agreecl 55.8(f)
Regional Grievance Committee constitutedWithin ten working dayscl 55.9(e)
Award dispute about duties outside the school dayThree working days with the manager, a further three with the manager's superior, then five working days after referral to the employer before either party can go to the WAIRCTEA007 award cl 12(6), cl 67(2)–(5)
TAFE workload disputeFive days with your manager; then a Workload Dispute Panel formed within one week, recommendations within two weeks, and the Managing Director's decision within one week of themWES337 cl 16.6, 16.9, 16.12
TAFE dispute then unresolvedTen working days after referral to the Managing Director and the union President, then the WAIRCWES337 cl 12.1(c)
Provisional improvement notice issued by a health and safety representativeMust give at least until the 8th day after it is issued to fix the problemWHS Act s 92(d)
Order banning a parent or visitor from schoolUp to 60 days; a review by the Director General is completed within 14 daysSchool Education Regulations r 78(1), r 100, r 101(1)(b)
Make a workers' compensation claimWithin 12 months after the injury occurs; a late claim is not invalid if the delay had a reasonable cause or does not prejudice the employerWCIM Act s 25(1), (5)
Employer passes the claim to its insurerWithin 7 dayss 26(1)
Insurer decides liability, or defersWithin 14 days of receiving the claim; if it does neither, liability is taken to be accepted. A deferred decision must be made before the day after 120 days from receipts 28(1), (4), (6); s 29(1), (3); WCIM Regulations r 19
Employer keeps your job open and gives notice before any dismissal12 months from first incapacity; 28 days' notice in the approved forms 166, s 168
Lodge a formal grievance (schools), for example about a class size above Table ATime limit: Within three weeks of the circumstances that give rise to it; the committee has a discretion to accept a later grievance, for example after sick leave or failed informal attempts, if you give written reasons for the delay
Level One (school) committee considers the grievanceTime limit: Within five working days of receiving it
Take an unresolved grievance to Level Two (regional committee)Time limit: Within five working days of being told Level One could not agree
Source
cl 55.8(f)
Regional Grievance Committee constitutedTime limit: Within ten working days
Source
cl 55.9(e)
Show all 13 rowsShow fewer
Award dispute about duties outside the school dayTime limit: Three working days with the manager, a further three with the manager's superior, then five working days after referral to the employer before either party can go to the WAIRC
TAFE workload disputeTime limit: Five days with your manager; then a Workload Dispute Panel formed within one week, recommendations within two weeks, and the Managing Director's decision within one week of them
TAFE dispute then unresolvedTime limit: Ten working days after referral to the Managing Director and the union President, then the WAIRC
Provisional improvement notice issued by a health and safety representativeTime limit: Must give at least until the 8th day after it is issued to fix the problem
Order banning a parent or visitor from schoolTime limit: Up to 60 days; a review by the Director General is completed within 14 days
Make a workers' compensation claimTime limit: Within 12 months after the injury occurs; a late claim is not invalid if the delay had a reasonable cause or does not prejudice the employer
Employer passes the claim to its insurerTime limit: Within 7 days
Source
s 26(1)
Insurer decides liability, or defersTime limit: Within 14 days of receiving the claim; if it does neither, liability is taken to be accepted. A deferred decision must be made before the day after 120 days from receipt
Source
s 28(1), (4), (6); s 29(1), (3); WCIM Regulations r 19
Employer keeps your job open and gives notice before any dismissalTime limit: 12 months from first incapacity; 28 days' notice in the approved form
Source
s 166, s 168

The short version

Teachers' hours and workload come from two instruments read together. The award caps face to face teaching at 21 hours 20 minutes a week and sets the weekly time for duties other than teaching (DOTT). The agreement says that no teacher or administrator "will be required to perform an unreasonable or excessive workload during the school year", limits meetings outside the school day, and gives a right not to answer messages off site. Each school has a Workload Advisory Committee, and a teacher can use the grievance procedure.

Read moreShow less

Class sizes in the schools agreement are planning figures. Schools "are to plan not to exceed" the Table A sizes, and a principal can go above them with extra support. A teacher asked to take a larger class can lodge a grievance. TAFE class sizes are not in the lecturers' agreement; they are in a separate agreed policy.

TAFE lecturers work 37.5 ordinary hours a week, of which up to 21 are lecturing, and the college must keep workloads "fair, manageable and without risk to health and safety". A Workload Dispute Panel deals with disputes.

On safety, the Department or college must keep you safe so far as is reasonably practicable, including from psychosocial hazards such as aggression and excessive workload. You can stop work facing a serious and immediate risk, and an elected health and safety representative can direct work to stop or issue a provisional improvement notice. Principals have powers to remove and ban threatening parents and visitors, but those powers are not a way of dealing with a school's own students.

If you are injured at work, including by an assault or through a psychological injury, you can claim workers' compensation within 12 months. There is no special presumption for teachers. A stress claim that arises mainly from reasonable performance or disciplinary action is excluded.

Workload in schools

Hours: the school day, face to face teaching and DOTT
WhatThe ruleSource
Minimum attendanceThe minimum daily attendance for a full-time employee is five hours and thirty-five minutes, "unless otherwise agreed by the Principal"SCH013 cl 7 (definition of "Normal School Day or Normal Operating Hours")
Face to face teaching, maximum21 hours 20 minutes a week for secondary, primary (since the start of 2021), pre-primary and kindergarten teachers. Contact and form classes countTEA007 award cl 13(2)–(4)
DOTT time320 minutes a week for secondary, pre-primary and kindergarten; 270 minutes for primary (since the start of 2021), exclusive of recess and lunch, within the normal school day. Multi-age classes are pro-rated by formulaaward cl 14(1)–(4)
What DOTT is forIts "priority use" is to "focus on teaching, learning and assessment"; examples include preparing materials, planning, record keeping and report writing. The parties support collaborative DOTT sessions that are teacher led, and their timing must not conflict with that priority use, and DOTT "should not be regularly timetabled to conflict with" assemblies and other scheduled activitiesSCH013 cl 11.2–11.4; award cl 14(3)
Minimum attendanceThe rule: The minimum daily attendance for a full-time employee is five hours and thirty-five minutes, "unless otherwise agreed by the Principal"
Source
SCH013 cl 7 (definition of "Normal School Day or Normal Operating Hours")
Face to face teaching, maximumThe rule: 21 hours 20 minutes a week for secondary, primary (since the start of 2021), pre-primary and kindergarten teachers. Contact and form classes count
DOTT timeThe rule: 320 minutes a week for secondary, pre-primary and kindergarten; 270 minutes for primary (since the start of 2021), exclusive of recess and lunch, within the normal school day. Multi-age classes are pro-rated by formula
What DOTT is forThe rule: Its "priority use" is to "focus on teaching, learning and assessment"; examples include preparing materials, planning, record keeping and report writing. The parties support collaborative DOTT sessions that are teacher led, and their timing must not conflict with that priority use, and DOTT "should not be regularly timetabled to conflict with" assemblies and other scheduled activities
Source
SCH013 cl 11.2–11.4; award cl 14(3)

The award also records that "a proportion of teachers' work is undertaken outside the normal school day", and that teachers are required to attend staff meetings, parent meetings and student supervision outside instruction hours (award cl 12(2)–(4)). Arrangements for duties outside the normal school day "will be the subject of consultation", and a teacher aggrieved by such a requirement "may choose to access" the award's dispute settlement procedure (award cl 12(6), cl 67).

The workload clauses

(a) Teachers: "Each Teacher's workload is negotiated at the school level within parameters provided in the Act", and "No Teacher will be required to perform an unreasonable or excessive workload during the school year" (SCH013 cl 9.2).

(b) Administrators: "No School Administrator will be required to perform an unreasonable or excessive workload during the school year" (cl 17.7).

(c) The agreement recognises that "class sizes have implications on Teacher workloads" (cl 12.1).

Work outside the school day

(a) Whole of staff meetings outside student instruction time can be required up to a total of five hours a term, with the agenda, venue and timing set "in full and proper consultation with staff" (cl 9.3(a)–(b)).

(b) A part-time teacher cannot be required to attend a staff meeting or school development day on a day they would not ordinarily work, and is paid if they agree to attend (cl 9.4(a)).

(c) Teachers can be required to hold up to two formal parent or carer meetings a year outside the normal school day (cl 9.5(a); award cl 12(5)).

(d) Payment or time off in lieu "may be considered" for agreed work outside instruction time, such as camps, festivals and parent interviews beyond the two, and for some assessment and repeated data collection (cl 9.6; cl 71.1(b)).

(e) Online professional learning on five listed topics (cultural awareness, accountable and ethical decision-making, child protection, recordkeeping, and work health and safety) "is expected to be completed during the normal working day" (cl 29.10). Online learning tied to legislative and system-wide requirements "can be expected" (cl 29.9), and "Any additional online learning is at the discretion of the Employee" (cl 29.11).

The right not to answer messages

Teachers and school administrators "are not required to initiate or respond to electronic and other communication from school staff, parents or community members when not on site", including on sick leave, approved leave, public holidays and student vacations (SCH013 cl 34.1). The exception is "an emergency, or where there are staffing or health related issues where failure to communicate could lead to Employees being disadvantaged" (cl 34.2).

Internal relief

The award says a teacher "shall not be required to teach in excess of the maximum standard number of hours per week of face to face teaching" (award cl 13(1)). The agreement adds that, for internal relief, nothing in that clause "prevents a Teacher from agreeing to teach hours that exceed the weekly maximum" (SCH013 cl 10.1), and that the teacher's DOTT then decreases to match (cl 11.1). Where a permanent or fixed-term teacher "is required to undertake" internal relief over the weekly maximum, the internal relief rates in Schedule A apply (cl 26.1–26.2). Principals should consider a graduate teacher's workload first, and a graduate's internal relief "should be by agreement" (cl 26.4).

The Workload Advisory Committee

Every school must have one.

(a) The principal establishes it at the start of each school year; it assesses workload issues, advises the principal and makes recommendations on using school resources to address them (SCH013 cl 57.1–57.3).

(b) The principal "has ultimate responsibility and authority for the operation of the school, including the allocation of resources, timetables and allocation of work" (cl 57.4).

(c) Schedule H sets the rules: equal numbers of administrators (including the principal) and elected staff, including an SSTUWA representative; meetings once or twice a term or as required, which may be held in school time with any relief funded by the school; jointly prepared agendas and minutes circulated to staff (SCH013 Sch H).

(d) Its matters include the use and allocation of DOTT, timetabling and allocating teachers to classes, school planning, duty of care and extra-school activities. It can list administrative tasks and recommend deleting or changing those that are "unnecessary or inefficient" (Sch H).

(e) It "may be used as part of the informal stage of dealing with workload-related grievances" (Sch H).

The Workload Intensification Taskforce

The agreement set up a Taskforce of representatives of the parties, to identify and evaluate initiatives on teacher and school leader workload, focusing on small group tuition, complex behaviour management, professional learning, compliance and individual student documented plans. It reports to the Minister for Education and runs for the life of the agreement (SCH013 cl 29.1–29.6). Its terms of reference were to be developed by the parties after registration (cl 29.4). This guide does not cover what it has published.

Workload and the general law

(a) Hours. Under the Minimum Conditions of Employment Act 1993 (WA), an employee is not to be required or requested to work more than their ordinary hours under their industrial instrument (or 38 hours a week if none is specified) plus "reasonable additional hours" (s 9A(1)). Whether extra hours are reasonable turns on all relevant factors, including any risk to health and safety and the employee's personal circumstances (s 9B). None of the decisions we reviewed applies s 9A to a teacher, whose instruments set a daily minimum attendance rather than weekly ordinary hours.

(b) Safety. A psychosocial hazard is one arising from "the design or management of work", the work environment, plant, or "workplace interactions or behaviours" that "may cause psychological harm" (Work Health and Safety (General) Regulations 2022 (WA) r 55A). In choosing controls, the employer must have regard to, among other things, "the design of work, including job demands and tasks" and "how work is managed, organised and supported" (r 55D(2)(c)–(d)). See Work health and safety below.

Class sizes

What the schools agreement says

"Schools are to plan not to exceed class sizes as per Table A – General Class Sizes, but, where it can be achieved within available school resources, schools are to attempt to reduce class sizes in line with Table B – Notional Class Size Target" (SCH013 cl 12.2).

Read moreShow less
YearTable A: general class sizesTable B: notional class size target
Kindergarten2020
Pre-primary (non purpose built centres)2523
Pre-primary (purpose built centres)2725
K/P20–27 (recommended no more than 20 in a class at any one time)20–25
K/P/120 at any one time20 at any one time
Years 1–324 (recommended no more than 23 in a 3/4 class at any one time)24
Years 4–63230
Mixed years (Years 4–6)3129
Years 7–103229
Years 11–122525
Practical16–2216–22
KindergartenTable A: general class sizes: 20
Table B: notional class size target
20
Pre-primary (non purpose built centres)Table A: general class sizes: 25
Table B: notional class size target
23
Pre-primary (purpose built centres)Table A: general class sizes: 27
Table B: notional class size target
25
K/PTable A: general class sizes: 20–27 (recommended no more than 20 in a class at any one time)
Table B: notional class size target
20–25
Show all 11 rowsShow fewer
K/P/1Table A: general class sizes: 20 at any one time
Table B: notional class size target
20 at any one time
Years 1–3Table A: general class sizes: 24 (recommended no more than 23 in a 3/4 class at any one time)
Table B: notional class size target
24
Years 4–6Table A: general class sizes: 32
Table B: notional class size target
30
Mixed years (Years 4–6)Table A: general class sizes: 31
Table B: notional class size target
29
Years 7–10Table A: general class sizes: 32
Table B: notional class size target
29
Years 11–12Table A: general class sizes: 25
Table B: notional class size target
25
PracticalTable A: general class sizes: 16–22
Table B: notional class size target
16–22

Source: SCH013 cl 12.2, Tables A and B and their footnotes.

A practical class is one "where issues of safety and workspace are critical to meeting duty of care", as determined by the principal; secondary outdoor education, home economics, woodwork, metalwork and automotive classes are designated practical classes (cl 12.3).

Going above Table A

"Schools will seek to keep class sizes at or below those in Table A", but school and student needs may require variation, provided that (SCH013 cl 12.4):

(a) the principal, in consultation with the affected teachers, "will provide additional support to ensure workloads are distributed as equitably as possible" (cl 12.4(a));

(b) a teacher "requested to accept a class size greater than those referred to in Table A can utilise the grievance procedures if they feel aggrieved by any proposed variation" (cl 12.4(b));

(c) both of those are "to be within available physical and human resources" (cl 12.4(c)).

Additional support takes into account the notional class size, how many students are on individual plans and the degree of student need (cl 12.5). Each school manages class sizes within its own resources (cl 12.6), and a school that has kept classes lower will try to maintain that (cl 12.7). The annual audit report on class sizes goes to the Employee Relations Executive Committee (EREC) "for information and consideration" (cl 12.8).

So the agreement sets planning figures and a grievance right. It does not say that a class above Table A is a breach, and it does not set a number that can never be exceeded.

What is policy rather than agreement

(a) Inclusion: class sizes may be adjusted to support students with special needs "within the available resources provided to each school and current guidelines" (SCH013 cl 61.1). The guidelines themselves are not in the agreement.

(b) Physical and outdoor education: the teacher to student ratios are in the Department's Recreation and Outdoor Education Activities for Public Schools Procedures, which the parties "acknowledge"; a change to those procedures "will only be as agreed between the Parties" (cl 61.2). The ratios are in the procedures, not the agreement.

(c) The student behaviour management strategy includes "targeted reduction in class sizes" (cl 69.3(a)), without numbers.

TAFE class sizes

WES337 contains no class size table. Class sizes are a matter for the SSTUWA TAFE Employee Relations Committee (STERC), "with respect to the agreed Memorandum of Understanding" (WES337 cl 15.2(k)), and the STERC policy on "Class Sizes (first agreed 2005)" is "to be reviewed by the parties during the life of this Agreement" (cl 15.3(f)). We have not read that policy. Class sizes are also one of the factors a Workload Dispute Panel must consider (cl 16.10(c)).

TAFE lecturer workload

Hours

WhatThe ruleSource
Ordinary hours37.5 a week, between 7.30 am and 8.00 pm Monday to Friday, subject to averagingWES337 cl 37.1
Lecturing hoursUp to 21 ordinary lecturing hours in a week, subject to averagingcl 37.7
Lecturing weeksNot required to lecture in more than 40 weeks in a calendar year, other than for averagingcl 37.8
Activities related to delivery (ARD)12 hours a week for a lecturer lecturing 21 hours; up to 7.5 hours of it may be off campus at the lecturer's discretion; 34 minutes of ARD for each hour of programmed overtime above 21cl 37.9, 37.11, 37.12
Professional activitiesThe balance of the 37.5 hours (4 hours 30 minutes for a full-time lecturer), between 8.00 am and 5.00 pm Monday to Friday, on campus unless agreedcl 37.13, 37.17; Sch L
Part-time lecturersARD and professional activities by fraction, from the Schedule L hours chartcl 37.10, 37.14; Sch L
Meal breakAt least 45 minutes between noon and 2.00 pm after no more than five hourscl 37.3
Days and nightsNo lecturing on more than five days a week, or on more than two nights starting at or after 5.30 pm, unless agreedcl 37.4
AveragingLecturing hours can be averaged over up to 21 weeks a semester (20 at North Regional TAFE), to a maximum of 420 hours; hours cannot be carried over between semesters; a credit at the end of the period is paid at time and a halfcl 38.1–38.3, 38.12
Additional lecturing hoursA full-time lecturer may agree to more than 840 lecturing hours a year, for a salary increase of 1% for the first extra 20 hours and 0.5% for each further 10; the agreement must be genuine, and duress or coercion is prohibitedcl 39.1, 39.4, 39.6
Ordinary hoursThe rule: 37.5 a week, between 7.30 am and 8.00 pm Monday to Friday, subject to averaging
Lecturing hoursThe rule: Up to 21 ordinary lecturing hours in a week, subject to averaging
Source
cl 37.7
Lecturing weeksThe rule: Not required to lecture in more than 40 weeks in a calendar year, other than for averaging
Source
cl 37.8
Activities related to delivery (ARD)The rule: 12 hours a week for a lecturer lecturing 21 hours; up to 7.5 hours of it may be off campus at the lecturer's discretion; 34 minutes of ARD for each hour of programmed overtime above 21
Source
cl 37.9, 37.11, 37.12
Show all 10 rowsShow fewer
Professional activitiesThe rule: The balance of the 37.5 hours (4 hours 30 minutes for a full-time lecturer), between 8.00 am and 5.00 pm Monday to Friday, on campus unless agreed
Source
cl 37.13, 37.17; Sch L
Part-time lecturersThe rule: ARD and professional activities by fraction, from the Schedule L hours chart
Source
cl 37.10, 37.14; Sch L
Meal breakThe rule: At least 45 minutes between noon and 2.00 pm after no more than five hours
Source
cl 37.3
Days and nightsThe rule: No lecturing on more than five days a week, or on more than two nights starting at or after 5.30 pm, unless agreed
Source
cl 37.4
AveragingThe rule: Lecturing hours can be averaged over up to 21 weeks a semester (20 at North Regional TAFE), to a maximum of 420 hours; hours cannot be carried over between semesters; a credit at the end of the period is paid at time and a half
Additional lecturing hoursThe rule: A full-time lecturer may agree to more than 840 lecturing hours a year, for a salary increase of 1% for the first extra 20 hours and 0.5% for each further 10; the agreement must be genuine, and duress or coercion is prohibited
Source
cl 39.1, 39.4, 39.6
Read moreShow less

Any averaging arrangement under which lecturers lecture more than 25 hours a week, other than by agreement, is reported to the College Joint Consultative Committee (cl 38.14).

The workload management clause

(WES337 cl 16)

(a) The Managing Director "will not require lecturers to undertake an unreasonable workload in the ordinary discharge of their duties" (cl 16.1).

(b) The Managing Director "will ensure workload allocation is fair, manageable and without risk to health and safety" (cl 16.2), and "will take reasonable steps to ensure that lecturers do not work excessive or unreasonable hours" (cl 16.3).

The right to disconnect

Lecturers "are not required to access work related information or respond to communications such as text messages and emails outside their ordinary hours" (WES337 cl 41.2). The college may still send communications "in the case of an emergency situation, genuine health and welfare concerns or for relief lecturing" (cl 41.3).

How to raise a workload concern

Teachers and school administrators

There are four routes, and which fits depends on what the concern is.

Read moreShow less
  1. Informally, and through the Workload Advisory Committee. Raise it with your line manager or principal first; the committee can be used as the informal stage of a workload grievance (SCH013 cl 55.6(a); Sch H).
  2. A formal grievance under cl 55. It covers worksite matters within the employer's control (cl 55.1). (a) Lodge it in writing within three weeks, clearly stating the relief you seek (cl 55.6(b)(i), (iii)). (b) Level One is the school consultative committee: the principal or line manager and the school's union representative, within five working days. You may bring a support person, who can advise but not represent you (cl 55.8(a)–(c)). (c) If Level One cannot agree, you have five working days to go to Level Two, and must tell the union and the Director of Education (cl 55.8(f)). (d) Level Two is a Regional Grievance Committee of a senior employee nominated by the Director General and a union member nominated by the SSTUWA President, constituted within ten working days (cl 55.9(e)). Its resolutions "are binding on all parties to the grievance" (cl 55.10). (e) While the grievance runs, the status quo before it was lodged stays in place, unless agreed or impractical (cl 55.3). (f) You have "the right to raise legitimate grievances without threat of repercussion" (cl 55.5(e)).
  3. The award dispute procedure, for a requirement to work outside the normal school day (award cl 12(6)). It runs through the manager, the manager's superior and the employer, and then either party may go to the WAIRC (award cl 67).
  4. The safety route. The grievance procedure excludes "work health and safety" matters, along with sexual harassment, equal opportunity, Commissioner's Instructions and the Code of Ethics, performance and disciplinary matters and criminal behaviour (SCH013 cl 55.2), and the agreement says safety issues "remain subject to the WHS Act" (cl 78.3). If the concern is that the workload is a risk to health, raise it with your health and safety representative or through the school's safety processes (see Work health and safety).

The agreement's dispute settlement procedure (cl 56) is between the Department and the union, about the agreement's interpretation, system-wide policies, conditions and safety matters. It is the union's route for a problem across many schools: local discussion within two weeks of a request, referral to EREC after six weeks or at any time, then the WAIRC (cl 56.2–56.7). A grievance with system-wide implications can also be referred to EREC (cl 55.6(b)(viii)).

TAFE lecturers

(WES337 cl 16.4–16.13)

  1. Raise it with your manager, alone or as a group. Management "will consider the workload issues raised" and, where necessary, act (cl 16.4). A request for review is made to the manager in writing (cl 16.5).
  2. If it is not resolved within five days, it goes to a Workload Dispute Panel, which either side can ask the college's Director Human Resources to set up (cl 16.6–16.7).
  3. The panel is formed within one week. It is the Director Human Resources and a nominee of the lecturers (who may be a union representative), who is not, and cannot be seen to be, a party to the dispute (cl 16.9).
  4. It must consider factors including lecturer health and wellbeing, the agreed timetabling principles, class sizes, the number and timing of units and their marking, the student cohort, other roles and the lecturer's personal circumstances (cl 16.10). It can propose interim solutions (cl 16.11).
  5. It recommends to the Managing Director within two weeks, and the Managing Director decides within one week of receiving the recommendations (cl 16.12).
  6. If that does not settle it, use the dispute and grievance procedure: discussion with the manager within five working days, with a union officer if needed; written referral to the Managing Director and the union President; and, if unresolved ten working days after that referral, the WAIRC (cl 12.1). You may have a union representative at every stage (cl 12.2).

Occupational violence

Assault is a crime

Teachers are "public officers" under the Criminal Code (WA), as persons employed by the State (s 1, definition of "public officer", para (e)); lecturers employed by a college are employees of a body established under a written law (para (d)). Assaulting a public officer who is performing a function of their employment, or because of it, is a serious assault (s 318(1)(d)), with a maximum of 7 years' imprisonment, or 10 years if the offender is armed or in company (s 318(1)(l)–(m)). The mandatory minimum sentences in s 318(2) and (4) apply only in "prescribed circumstances", which name police, prison, youth custodial and transit security officers (among others), not teachers (s 318(5)).

Read moreShow less

Parents, carers and visitors: the school's powers

The School Education Act gives government schools tools against people who are not students. Students can be ordered to leave only when the school is not open for instruction, and a prohibition order cannot be made against a student at the school or a member of staff.

(a) Leave for 24 hours. A principal or other authorised person who reasonably suspects that a non-student has "used threatening, abusive or insulting language towards a teacher acting in an official capacity", or has substantially disrupted (or is likely to disrupt) the school, may require the person to give their name and address and to leave the premises and stay away for 24 hours (School Education Act 1999 (WA) s 120(1)). Failing to comply carries a fine of $5,000, and the person can be detained until delivered to police (s 120(2)–(3)).

(b) Orders to leave. An authorised person may order a non-student to leave the premises for up to 24 hours, on reasonably suspecting (among other grounds) that the person has used or is about to use "threatening, abusive or insulting language" or "threatening or violent behaviour" towards anyone on the premises (School Education Regulations 2000 (WA) r 75(1), r 76(b)). A student can be ordered to leave only when the school is not open for instruction (r 75(2)).

(c) Prohibition orders. The principal may ban a person from entering the school without permission for up to 60 days from service, if satisfied that the person would otherwise be likely to "cause physical harm to, or apprehension or fear in, another person" on the premises (or damage property) and that an order is appropriate (r 78(1)–(2)). The order takes effect only when personally served (r 78(4)). It cannot be made against a student at the school or against teaching or other staff of any government school (r 79). The person banned can ask the Director General to review it, and the review is completed within 14 days (r 100, r 101(1)(b)).

Students

Apart from an order to leave when the school is not open for instruction (r 75(2)), the powers above do not reach a school's own students. What applies to aggression by students in this guide is the employer's safety duty and the psychosocial regulations (below), the student behaviour management strategy in the agreement, and the criminal law. The School Education Act's student discipline, suspension and exclusion powers are not covered in this guide yet.

What the agreements say

(a) Schools: the Department commits to the student behaviour management and discipline strategy for the life of the agreement, including targeted class size reductions, "a minimum of 20 FTE Teacher Consultants", professional development in behaviour management and school-based programs (SCH013 cl 69).

(b) Both agreements require the employer to "do what is reasonably practicable to eliminate or minimise risks to psychological health and safety in the workplace", to assess and implement controls in consultation with the WHS committee, and to train managers to prevent and manage harm from psychosocial risks (SCH013 cl 35.14–35.16; WES337 cl 51.8).

(c) Neither agreement has a clause specifically about assaults on staff by students or parents.

Work health and safety: duties and rights

The Work Health and Safety Act 2020 (WA) (WHS Act) applies to schools and colleges. The schools agreement records that "The Department remains the Employer for the purpose of the WHS Act" and that principals are responsible for implementing the safety policy and procedures "within their control and available resources" (SCH013 cl 78.1). WES337 says the WHS Act and the WHS Regulations apply to TAFE lecturers, and that nothing in the agreement alters the rights and obligations under them (cl 88.1, 88.4).

Read moreShow less

The employer's duties

(a) The Department or college, as the person conducting the business or undertaking, "must ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health and safety of" its workers (s 19(1)), including a work environment without risks to health and safety and safe systems of work (s 19(3)(a), (c)).

(b) It must manage psychosocial risks (WHS Regulations r 55C) and eliminate them, or if that is not reasonably practicable minimise them, so far as is reasonably practicable (r 55D(1)). In deciding how, it must have regard to "the duration, frequency and severity of the exposure", how hazards "interact or combine", job demands, how work is "managed, organised and supported", "workplace interactions or behaviours", and the information, training, instruction and supervision given to workers (r 55D(2)). Aggression from students or parents is a workplace interaction or behaviour that may cause psychological harm, and excessive workload arises from the design or management of work, so both fall within the definition in r 55A on its words.

(c) It must consult, so far as is reasonably practicable, workers who are or are likely to be directly affected by a health or safety matter (s 47(1)).

Everyone else's duties

Workers must take reasonable care for their own and others' safety and follow reasonable safety instructions and policies (s 28). Any "person at a workplace", which includes students, parents and visitors, must take reasonable care for their own safety, take reasonable care not to harm others, and comply so far as reasonably able with reasonable instructions from the employer (s 29).

Health and safety representatives

(a) Any worker may ask the employer to facilitate an election of one or more health and safety representatives (s 50).

(b) A representative represents the work group on health and safety, monitors the employer's compliance, investigates complaints and inquires into risks; they may inspect the workplace after reasonable notice, or at any time without notice after an incident or where there is a serious risk from an immediate or imminent hazard (s 68(1)–(2)).

(c) Both agreements require a register of representatives, with their training, to be kept and given to the union every six months (SCH013 cl 79; WES337 cl 88.6–88.8). Representatives are entitled to training and paid time off as the WHS laws prescribe (WES337 cl 88.3).

Stopping unsafe work

(a) You may cease, or refuse to carry out, work if you have "a reasonable concern" that it would expose you or anyone else to "a serious risk to their health or safety emanating from an immediate or imminent exposure to a hazard" (s 84(1)).

(b) If you stop work, tell the employer as soon as practicable (unless a representative directed you to stop), and remain available for suitable alternative work (s 86). The employer may direct you to safe and appropriate alternative work until you can resume (s 87). Stopping work does not affect the continuity of your engagement, provided you have not unreasonably refused suitable alternative work (s 88).

(c) A trained health and safety representative may direct a worker in their work group to cease work on the same kind of concern (s 85(1), (6)). Ordinarily they must first consult the employer and try to resolve the matter under the Act's issue resolution process, unless the risk is so serious and immediate that consulting first is not reasonable (s 85(2)–(3)).

(d) The representative, the employer or the worker may ask the regulator to send an inspector to help resolve the issue (s 89).

Provisional improvement notices

A trained health and safety representative who reasonably believes the employer is contravening the WHS Act, or has done so in a way likely to continue or be repeated, may issue a provisional improvement notice requiring it to remedy the contravention (s 90(1)–(2), (4)). The representative must consult the employer first (s 90(3)). The notice must be in writing and state the provision, how it is being contravened and a date to remedy it that is no earlier than the 8th day after it is issued (s 91, s 92). The employer must display it near the affected work (s 97(1)).

Protection for raising safety concerns

An employer must not dismiss you, or otherwise put you to detriment, for a prohibited reason; it is an offence where that reason is the dominant reason (s 104(1)–(2), s 105). The prohibited reasons include being a health and safety representative, exercising a power under the Act, and raising or proposing to raise "an issue or concern about work health and safety" with the employer, an inspector, a representative or another worker (s 106(a)–(h)).

Workers' compensation

The Workers Compensation and Injury Management Act 2023 (WA) (WCIM Act) applies to teachers and lecturers. The Act was read in its consolidation as at 25 September 2025.

Read moreShow less

What counts as a work injury

(a) A personal injury by accident is an injury from employment if it "arises out of or in the course of the employment" (s 6(2)). A physical injury from an assault by a student or parent at school fits this test.

(b) A disease, or the aggravation of an existing one, is an injury from employment if it was contracted in the course of the employment and "the employment contributed to a significant degree" to it (s 6(3)). The factors include the duration and nature of the work, the likelihood of the condition arising anyway, and the worker's health and activities outside work (s 6(4)).

The Act does not say which test a psychological condition from workload or repeated aggression falls under in a given case; that depends on the medical evidence.

Psychological injury and the administrative action exclusion

A psychological or psychiatric disorder "is not an injury from employment if it results wholly or predominantly from" administrative action, "not being administrative action that is unreasonable and harsh on the part of the employer", or from the worker's expectation of administrative action (s 7(2)). Administrative action includes a performance appraisal, suspension, disciplinary action, and anything done in connection with demotion, dismissal, retrenchment, or failing to get a promotion, reclassification, transfer or other benefit (s 7(1)).

So a claim for stress arising from a substandard performance or discipline process will fail unless the process was "unreasonable and harsh", or the injury did not result wholly or predominantly from it. The list of administrative action is not exhaustive ("includes"), so whether another management decision, such as how work is allocated, counts is decided on the facts of the case. Violence and trauma at work are not administrative action.

No presumption for teachers

None of the Act's presumptions, which treat certain illnesses as work-related unless the employer proves otherwise, is written for teaching, and none covers a psychological injury in teaching. The disease presumptions in WCIM Regulations Schedule 1 depend on exposure (for example, contact with human waste or bodily fluids), not on occupation. The post-traumatic stress disorder presumption is for paramedics, ambulance officers and ambulance call-takers, Crown firefighters and fire communications officers (WCIM Regulations r 10(2)); the cancer presumption is for firefighters (WCIM Act s 11). A teacher or lecturer claims under the ordinary tests in s 6.

How to claim

  1. See a doctor and get a certificate of capacity.
  2. Give your employer a completed claim form in the approved form and the certificate. That is when the claim is "made" (s 25(2)).
  3. Do this within 12 months after the injury occurs (s 25(1)). A late or defective claim is not invalid if the failure came from mistake, absence from the State or another reasonable cause, or would not prejudice the employer's defence (s 25(5)). For a psychological condition that builds up over time, the day it "occurs" may be hard to pin down, so a claim made promptly avoids that question.
  4. The employer must give the claim to its insurer within 7 days (s 26(1)); if it does not, you can give it to the insurer yourself (s 27(1)–(2)).
  5. Within 14 days of receiving the claim, the insurer must accept it, accept it with liability questions, dispute it, or tell you the decision is deferred (s 28(1)–(4)). If it does none of these, it is taken to have accepted liability (s 28(6)). A deferred decision must be made before the day after 120 days from receipt, or liability is again taken to be accepted (s 29(1), (3); Regulations r 19).
  6. A disputed claim can be decided by an arbitrator (s 30(1)).

The claim form includes an authority to release your medical information. Giving it is optional (s 25(4)).

Pay while the claim is decided, and after

(a) While the claim is decided, you are granted paid personal leave to the extent of your credits. If the claim succeeds, the personal leave is reinstated and the absence is treated as income compensation (schools) or workers' compensation (TAFE) (SCH013 cl 35.51; WES337 cl 51.15(a)).

(b) Once liability is accepted, the first income compensation payment is due within 14 days, including arrears from your first day of incapacity (s 47(2)(a)).

(c) Income compensation is your pre-injury weekly rate of income for the first 26 weeks in which it is payable, then 85% of it, except as provided in s 56 and s 57 (s 55(2)–(3)).

(d) Service and leave. For teachers, an absence on a compensable injury does not affect the anniversary dates for personal leave, long service leave or annual leave "to the extent defined in" s 61(2)(d) of the Act (SCH013 cl 35.52). For lecturers, "An Employee's absence on workers compensation counts as continuous service and does not affect the anniversary date of increments or the anniversary date and accrual of leave entitlements" (WES337 cl 51.15(b)). The Act itself also provides that a worker accrues annual leave, long service leave and sick leave for any period of income compensation (WCIM Act s 61(2)(d)). See the TAFE case example below on the earlier wording.

Returning to work, and protection from dismissal

(a) The employer must ensure a return to work program is set up, in consultation with you as far as reasonably practicable, as soon as practicable after your doctor certifies you as partly fit or advises in writing that one should be set up (s 160(2)–(3)).

(b) For 12 months from the day you first have an incapacity for work, the employer must give you your pre-injury position or, if that is not reasonably practicable or you cannot do it, a suitable position most comparable in status and pay. This does not apply if you are lawfully dismissed (s 166(1)–(3)).

(c) During those 12 months the employer must not dismiss you solely or mainly because you are incapacitated, and must not dismiss you for any reason without first giving at least 28 days' notice of intention to dismiss in the approved form. Each is an offence carrying a fine of up to $10,000 (s 168(2)–(4)). These protections sit alongside your other rights (s 168(5)).

For dismissal, medical retirement and the routes to challenge them, see our page on discipline and dismissal for WA teachers and lecturers.

For unions and industrial officers

The same research agent can work through your members' agreement, its history in the Commission, and the decisions on it.

Decided cases

What the Commission and the courts decided.

Published decisions, retold in plain English from the decision itself. Each links to the full text. Lawcaptain did not act in these cases.

Declaration refusedWestern Australian Industrial Relations Commission · 16 December 2015

Union could not hold the Department to a 2009 deal limiting report comments

In 2009 the Department and the union agreed that primary teachers in Years 1 to 7 would only have to write report comments in English and Mathematics, with any other comments left to the teacher. The union said that agreement still bound the Department and could change only by further agreement. The Commission found it had been replaced by later policy and agreements, and that workload from reporting is for principals and the workload committees to manage.

Read the full storyShow less

The union complained that the Department had "unilaterally changed" the approach previously agreed about the reports teachers must give parents ([1]). That approach was set out in a document issued jointly by the Director General and the union's President, dated 8 April 2009 ([2]). Its key term was that, in addition to an overall comment, "teachers in Years 1-7 will only be required to write comments in the English and Mathematics learning areas", and that additional comments were at the teacher's discretion ([70]). The union sought a declaration that this set the minimum reporting requirements for primary teachers, and an order that the Department stop requiring anything else ([5]).

The Commission found the 2009 agreement had grown out of a period in which the reporting requirements under Outcomes Based Education "added unreasonably to an already heavy teachers' workload" ([186]). It was "a product of its time" ([187]). Apart from the limit on comments, its terms had been met, and the comments limit had been superseded by later agreements and by policy changes from the Australian Curriculum, Independent Public Schools and the move of Year 7 to high school ([159]). The 2010 reporting policy replaced both the 2008 policy and the 2009 agreement ([172]).

The later general agreements did not give the union a veto. They required the Department to consult the union "with a view to reaching agreement" on changes to the reporting template ([101], [110]). The Commission held that this means consulting with a genuine intention to agree, but "nothing in this process prevents the Department from implementing change if no agreement is reached" ([180]-[181]).

On workload, the Commission was unable to find any evidence of excessive workload arising from the reporting requirements ([140]). It accepted that report writing is an intense period of work, but found that the pressure is not constant ([192]). It said workload "is now a matter for individual school principals to manage", with advisory mechanisms in each school ([196]), and that if reporting workload is a wider problem than the evidence showed, "it ought to be documented and raised in the appropriate forums" ([195]). The declaration was not appropriate and the matter was dismissed ([190], [201]).

In the decision's words: "If workload associated with reporting is a real and more widespread issue at school level than the evidence indicates, it ought to be documented and raised in the appropriate forums." ([195]).

What it means for you

A side agreement between the union and the Department, made to deal with a problem of its time, may not survive later policies and later general agreements. A member who finds report writing or other duties pushing their workload too high may be able to raise it at school level, with a record of the hours and tasks involved, because the Commission put weight on the lack of documented complaints ([139]-[140], [195]). The mechanisms the Commission relied on are still in the current schools agreement (School Education Act Employees' (Teachers and Administrators) General Agreement 2023, registered 4 November 2024, Director General, Department of Education v The State School Teachers' Union of W.A. [2024] WAIRC 00949, SCH013): no teacher is to be required to perform an unreasonable or excessive workload (cl 9.2(b)); the Principal must establish a Workload Advisory Committee each year (cl 57.1), while keeping "ultimate responsibility and authority" for the allocation of work (cl 57.4); schools report formally twice a year on the Department template (cl 73.2), and the Department must consult the unions "with a view to reaching agreement" on changes to that template (cl 73.3). See https://downloads.wairc.wa.gov.au/agreements/sch013.pdf.

Outcome: The Department won. The Commission refused the union's declaration that the 2009 reporting agreement still set the minimum reporting requirements for primary teachers, and dismissed the matter.

Declaration refusedWestern Australian Industrial Relations Commission · 20 December 2024

TAFE lecturers off work on workers' compensation did not keep accruing annual leave under the 2021 agreement

The union asked the Commission to declare that a TAFE lecturer off work and receiving workers' compensation keeps building up annual leave under the Western Australian TAFE Lecturers' General Agreement 2021. The Commission read the agreement the other way: once the claim was accepted, the absence became personal leave without pay, and only the first three months counted towards annual leave. The current lecturers' agreement and the new workers' compensation Act have since changed that rule.

Read the full storyShow less

The union applied under s 46 of the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA) for the Commission to declare the true interpretation of cl 45.1(a) of the Western Australian TAFE Lecturers' General Agreement 2021 ([1]). That clause gave "four (4) weeks paid leave for each year of service" ([5]). The union wanted a declaration that "year of service" includes time absent from work and receiving workers' compensation payments, and that cls 51.4(b) and 51.8 do not limit annual leave in that situation ([4]).

The Commission found that the workers' compensation clause, cl 51.8, worked in two steps ([83]): (a) while a lecturer is absent because of a compensable injury, the employer must grant personal leave with pay, to the extent of the lecturer's personal leave credits ([83], [87]); (b) once the claim is decided in the lecturer's favour, the personal leave credits are reinstated and the absence is converted to personal leave without pay ([83], [89]).

That conversion brings in cl 51.4(b), which says personal leave without pay over three months in a continuous absence is "excised from qualifying service" ([5], [91]-[92]). So only three months of the absence counts towards annual leave, long service leave and salary increment dates, and the period beyond three months does not ([92]). The same result follows where a lecturer has no or not enough personal leave credits and applies for personal leave without pay ([93]-[94]). The Commission found the words were not ambiguous, so it could not look at an old public sector instruction, Administrative Instruction 610, which the union said was more generous ([119]-[120], [134]-[135]).

The union's alternative argument was that the Minimum Conditions of Employment Act 1993 (WA) s 23, which gives paid annual leave "for each year of service", applied ([11]). The Commission followed an earlier Industrial Magistrate's decision that "service" means performing duties, so a worker on compensation is not giving service ([137], [141], [195]-[196]). It declined to make the declaration and dismissed the application ([201]-[202]).

In the decision's words: "upon proper interpretation of the Agreement, cls 51.4(b) and 51.8 apply to limit annual leave entitlements in situations where an employee is absent from work and receiving workers' compensation payments." ([119]).

What it means for you

The rule in this decision no longer stands for current absences. The decision applied the 2021 agreement and the Workers' Compensation and Injury Management Act 1981 (WA), which had been repealed on 1 July 2024 ([6]). Two later changes reverse it: (a) the Western Australian TAFE Lecturers' General Agreement 2023 (WES337), registered on 30 October 2024 to replace the 2021 agreement (Governing Council of North Metropolitan TAFE [2024] WAIRC 00932), now says that once a claim is accepted "the period of absence shall be granted as workers compensation", not as personal leave without pay (cl 51.15(a)), and that "An Employee's absence on workers compensation counts as continuous service and does not affect the anniversary date of increments or the anniversary date and accrual of leave entitlements" (cl 51.15(b)). The annual leave entitlement is unchanged at four weeks for each year of service (cl 45.1(a)). The agreement has a nominal expiry date of 15 December 2026 (cl 7.1). See cl 51.15; (b) the Workers Compensation and Injury Management Act 2023 (WA) s 61(2)(d) provides that, for any period a worker is entitled to income compensation, the worker "accrues entitlements to annual leave, long service leave and sick leave that the worker would have accrued if the worker had not been entitled to receive income compensation for that period". A lecturer who has been off work on workers' compensation and finds their annual leave balance has not grown may be able to ask the college, or the union, to check the balance against cl 51.15(b) of the 2023 agreement and s 61 of the 2023 Act.

Outcome: The TAFE colleges won. The Commission declined the union's declaration that lecturers absent on workers' compensation keep accruing annual leave, and dismissed the application.

Won by the union in the endWestern Australian Industrial Relations Commission · 28 August 2018

A teacher medically retired on a thin briefing note won his job back at another school, after two appeals

A teacher of 36 years' service, on sick leave after trouble with student behaviour and a disciplinary process, was retired on grounds of ill health on a briefing note that left out the occupational physician's earlier reports. The Commission found the retirement unfair, and after two Full Bench appeals he was ordered back to work at another school. His money award was halved: a quarter off for not trying to reduce his loss, and a quarter off because a medical certificate was not disclosed at the first hearing.

Read the full storyShow less

By letter of 22 February 2018 the Department told a teacher that his employment would end because "your current medical condition [means] you are unable to fulfil the duties and responsibilities associated with your substantive position as a teacher" ([1]). He had been employed as a teacher for 36 years, and taught at a regional senior high school (The State School Teachers' Union of W.A. (Incorporated) v Director-General, Department of Education [2019] WAIRC 00175 at [2]). He had been on sick leave since April 2017 after incidents with students, and in the meantime the Department investigated an allegation that he had made physical contact with a student (SSTUWA v Director-General [2019] WAIRC 00175 at [17]-[19], [28]). The only material before the decision maker was a briefing note, the occupational physician's "update" report of 20 December 2017 and the teacher's email; the physician's reports of 5 September and 6 December 2017 were not attached (SSTUWA v Director-General [2019] WAIRC 00175 at [52]).

Commissioner Matthews found the retirement unfair ([47]). His reasons were these: (a) the December update report said a return to the old school carried a "significant risk of further stress leave" and then rephrased that as "permanent incapacity", which a reasonable reader would want explained ([10]-[14]); (b) the briefing note's summary of the September report was "a poor one": that report said the teacher was "substantially improved", only "mildly anxious", and expected to recover ([27]-[28]); (c) on the Commissioner's summary of it, the 6 December report expressed the opinion "that there was no medical reason why the applicant's member could not return to work" ([30]-[31]); (d) a reasonable decision maker "would have insisted on a much better briefing note attaching all relevant material" ([38]). But the Commissioner held that a return to work was impracticable, because he found the teacher was staying away because of a non-medical reaction to the disciplinary process ([59]-[60], [65]-[66]). He started at six months' pay, took off one month because the teacher had made no attempt to find other work or income, and ordered 20 weeks' salary ([69], [71]-[73]; The State School Teachers' Union of W.A. (Incorporated) v Director-General, Department of Education [2018] WAIRC 00724).

The Full Bench agreed the dismissal was unfair: the briefing note "fell well short of what is required for medical retirement" (SSTUWA v Director-General [2019] WAIRC 00175 at [96]). It held the Commissioner was wrong about the reason for the absence, because his conclusion ignored the brief reports of the treating psychologist and general practitioner (SSTUWA v Director-General [2019] WAIRC 00175 at [97]). The teacher's response to a disciplinary finding, after being abused by students and taking leave for anxiety, was "a normal response" (SSTUWA v Director-General [2019] WAIRC 00175 at [99]), and there was no medical evidence for treating an "emotional" reaction as unrelated to his health (SSTUWA v Director-General [2019] WAIRC 00175 at [108]). There was not enough evidence of his current health to decide the remedy, so it was sent back (SSTUWA v Director-General [2019] WAIRC 00175 at [111], [120]). On a union referral under s 44(9) the Commission was not limited to the s 23A remedies and had to decide whether he should be re-employed at another school (SSTUWA v Director-General [2019] WAIRC 00175 at [119]). The Department's cross-appeal against the compensation failed, because on the treating practitioners' evidence he may have been entitled to sick leave (SSTUWA v Director-General [2019] WAIRC 00175 at [127]).

On the remittal the parties agreed the question was a return to a school other than the old one (The State School Teachers' Union of W.A. (Incorporated) v Director-General, Department of Education [2020] WAIRC 00292 at [8]). The union's psychiatrist said the teacher was fit for work at another school, and that evidence was "not undermined in any way by cross-examination nor competing evidence" (SSTUWA v Director-General [2020] WAIRC 00292 at [9]-[12]). The Commissioner refused to speculate that he might relapse at a new school (SSTUWA v Director-General [2020] WAIRC 00292 at [13], [15]). The Department's argument that the teacher's letters to parliamentarians and departmental office holders showed a "deep-seated lack of trust" failed: the letters were few, went to relevant people, concerned real events and contained no abuse (SSTUWA v Director-General [2020] WAIRC 00292 at [22]-[24], [27]-[29], [31]). The pay since dismissal was discounted by 50% (25% because the teacher made no effort to mitigate his loss, and 25% because of "the document issue at first instance": the union had not disclosed, at the first hearing, an email attaching a general practitioner's medical certificate of 1 March 2018, nor volunteered a later medical report) (SSTUWA v Director-General [2020] WAIRC 00292 at [32]-[34], [36], [45]). Dismissing the whole matter for that non-disclosure would have been "an extraordinary event", and the s 27 application was dismissed (SSTUWA v Director-General [2020] WAIRC 00292 at [68]-[69]).

The Full Bench dismissed the Department's appeal (Director General, Department of Education Western Australia v State School Teachers' Union of WA (Incorporated) [2020] WAIRC 00928). Senior Commissioner Kenner held that the finding that the teacher was fit to teach at another school was "the only reasonable conclusion that could be reached" (Director General, Department of Education Western Australia v State School Teachers' Union of WA (Incorporated) [2020] WAIRC 00927 at [96]), and that nothing relied on by the Department showed a loss of trust in "a classroom setting" (Director General v SSTUWA [2020] WAIRC 00927 at [134]). There was no evidence the certificate was withheld other than inadvertently, and dismissing the case would have been "a harsh and unjustified response" (Director General v SSTUWA [2020] WAIRC 00927 at [144], [146]). Chief Commissioner Scott added that "Employees are not expected to be meek and compliant in all things" (Director General v SSTUWA [2020] WAIRC 00927 at [12]), and Commissioner Emmanuel agreed with the Senior Commissioner (Director General v SSTUWA [2020] WAIRC 00927 at [165]).

In the decision's words: "I consider that the reasonable reader would have rejected the briefing note and its attachments as a proper evidential basis upon which to decide such a weighty question as whether someone's long career with an organisation ought effectively be brought to an end on the grounds of ill health and would have sought more comprehensive information." ([23]).

What it means for you

A member facing a proposed retirement on grounds of ill health may be able to ask that the decision rest on the whole medical record, including every report from the Department's own occupational physician and the treating practitioners, not a summary of one report. Where the union refers the dismissal to the Commission under s 44, the member may be able to seek a return to work at a different school, which the Commission ordered here. The remedy can be reduced: here a quarter of the lost pay went because the teacher made no effort to find other work or income, and a quarter because of documents not disclosed at the first hearing (SSTUWA v Director-General [2020] WAIRC 00292 at [34], [36], [45]). The retirement clause then in force was cl 41(5) of the Teachers (Public Sector Primary and Secondary Education) Award 1993, which the Commission did not need to construe ([45]). The current schools agreement now sets out the process in cl 35.39-35.42 (https://downloads.wairc.wa.gov.au/agreements/sch013.pdf): a copy of the independent medical advice must be given to the employee (cl 35.41(c)), and the decision "must be based on evidence that on balance indicates that the Employee is not fit to perform the inherent requirements of the position for which they have been employed and is not likely to be fit to do so in the foreseeable future" (cl 35.41(d)).

Outcome: Won by the union in the end. At first instance the retirement on grounds of ill health was found unfair, but a return to work was held impracticable and 20 weeks' salary was ordered (SSTUWA v Director-General [2018] WAIRC 00724). The Full Bench allowed the union's appeal, suspended that order and remitted the remedy, and dismissed the Department's cross-appeal (The State School Teachers' Union of W.A. (Incorporated) v Director-General, Department of Education [2019] WAIRC 00178, orders 1-3; Director General, Department of Education v The State School Teachers' Union of WA (Incorporated) [2019] WAIRC 00177). On the remittal the Commission ordered that the teacher be returned to employment within 21 days and to work at a school other than his old school as soon as practicable, with service deemed continuous and 50% of the pay he would have earned since dismissal (The State School Teachers' Union of W.A. (Incorporated) v Director-General, Department of Education [2020] WAIRC 00301, orders (1)-(3)); the Department's application to have the whole matter dismissed under s 27(1)(a) was dismissed (The State School Teachers' Union of W.A. (Incorporated) v Director-General, Department of Education [2020] WAIRC 00300). The Department's appeal from that was dismissed (Director General v SSTUWA [2020] WAIRC 00928).

Show more case studies (1)(1)Show fewer
Worked examples

How it plays out, step by step.

Illustrative example, not a real case

A TAFE lecturer's annual leave balance stops growing during workers' compensation

A lecturer injures her back lifting equipment in a workshop in February 2026 and is off work for five months, returning in July 2026. Her claim is accepted. When she returns, her annual leave balance shows no leave accrued after the first three months of absence.

Walk through itShow less
  1. The claim. A workers' compensation claim must be made within 12 months after the injury occurs (Workers Compensation and Injury Management Act 2023 (WA) s 25(1)).
  2. What the current agreement says. Personal leave is granted to the extent of her credits while she is off; once the claim is decided in her favour, the personal leave is reinstated and "the period of absence shall be granted as workers compensation" (WES337 cl 51.15(a)). An absence on workers' compensation "counts as continuous service and does not affect the anniversary date of increments or the anniversary date and accrual of leave entitlements" (cl 51.15(b)).
  3. What the Act says. For any period she is entitled to income compensation, she accrues the annual leave, long service leave and sick leave she would otherwise have accrued (WCIM Act s 61(2)(d)).
  4. Why the balance may be wrong. Under the earlier 2021 agreement, the Commission held that an accepted claim converted the absence to personal leave without pay, and only three months counted towards annual leave (The State School Teachers' Union of W.A. v Governing Council of North Metropolitan TAFE [2024] WAIRC 01067 at [83], [89]-[92], [119]). Under the 2023 agreement, cl 51.15(a) now grants the absence as workers' compensation, not as personal leave without pay, so a payroll system still applying the earlier reading may be out of date.
  5. Enforcing it. If the college does not credit the leave, she, or the union as a party to the agreement, may apply to the Industrial Magistrates Court to enforce the agreement (IR Act s 83(1)(c), (e)), within 6 years of the failure (s 82A).
Questions

The things people ask.

How many hours of face to face teaching can I be required to do?

No more than 21 hours 20 minutes a week, whether you teach secondary, primary, pre-primary or kindergarten (TEA007 award cl 13(1)–(3)). You can agree to teach more as internal relief, in which case your DOTT falls to match and internal relief rates apply (SCH013 cl 10.1, 11.1, 26.1–26.2).

How much DOTT time do I get?

320 minutes a week for secondary, pre-primary and kindergarten teachers and 270 minutes for primary teachers, within the normal school day and not counting recess and lunch (award cl 14(1)–(2)). Its priority use is teaching, learning and assessment (SCH013 cl 11.2).

Is there a maximum class size in WA public schools?

The agreement sets Table A sizes that schools "are to plan not to exceed", for example 24 in Years 1 to 3, 32 in Years 4 to 10 and 25 in Years 11 and 12 (SCH013 cl 12.2). A school may go above them if the principal provides additional support, within available resources, and a teacher asked to take a larger class can lodge a grievance (cl 12.4). The agreement does not say a larger class is a breach.

What can I do if my class is above the Table A size?

You can use the grievance procedure, lodging within three weeks (SCH013 cl 12.4(b), cl 55.6(b)(i)). You can also raise it with the school's Workload Advisory Committee, which advises the principal on workload and timetabling (cl 57; Sch H).

Do I have to answer parents' emails at night or in the holidays?

No. Teachers and administrators are not required to initiate or respond to communication from staff, parents or the community when not on site, including in student vacations, except in an emergency or where failing to communicate about staffing or health issues could disadvantage employees (SCH013 cl 34). TAFE lecturers have a similar right outside their ordinary hours, with exceptions for emergencies, genuine health and welfare concerns and relief lecturing (WES337 cl 41).

How many staff meetings can I be required to attend after school?

Whole of staff meetings outside student instruction time can total up to five hours a term (SCH013 cl 9.3(a)). Part-time teachers cannot be required to attend on a day they would not ordinarily work (cl 9.4(a)).

What is a TAFE lecturer's full-time load?

37.5 ordinary hours a week: up to 21 hours of lecturing, 12 hours of activities related to delivery and 4 hours 30 minutes of professional activities, with lecturing in no more than 40 weeks a year unless averaged (WES337 cl 37.1, 37.7–37.9, Sch L).

My TAFE workload is unreasonable. What is the process?

Raise it with your manager, in writing for a review. If it is not resolved in five days, it goes to a Workload Dispute Panel, which recommends to the Managing Director within two weeks; the Managing Director decides within a week. If that fails, the dispute and grievance procedure leads to the WAIRC (WES337 cl 16.4–16.13, cl 12.1).

A parent threatened me at school. What can the principal do?

The principal can require the parent to give their name and address and leave the school for 24 hours (School Education Act s 120), order them off the premises (Regulations r 75, r 76(b)), and ban them from the school for up to 60 days if they would otherwise be likely to cause harm or fear (r 78). Threats and assaults may also be criminal offences.

Can a student be banned from school under those powers?

No. Section 120 and r 75(1) apply to people who are not students, and r 79 prevents a prohibition order against a student at the school. Student discipline is dealt with under other powers, which this guide does not yet cover.

Can I refuse to work if I am at risk of being hurt?

Yes, if you have a reasonable concern that the work would expose you or others to a serious risk from an immediate or imminent hazard (WHS Act s 84). Tell your employer as soon as practicable and remain available for suitable alternative work (s 86). The employer must not dismiss you or put you to detriment for raising a safety concern (s 104–106).

Can I claim workers' compensation for stress from my workload?

You can claim. A psychological condition is compensable if it meets the tests in WCIM Act s 6. The exclusion in s 7 covers a disorder that results wholly or predominantly from administrative action, such as performance appraisal, suspension and discipline, unless the action was "unreasonable and harsh"; whether a particular management decision about workload counts depends on the facts. There is no presumption for teachers, so the claim rests on the medical evidence.

How long do I have to make a workers' compensation claim?

12 months after the injury occurs (WCIM Act s 25(1)). A late claim is not invalid if the delay came from mistake or another reasonable cause, or would not prejudice the employer's defence (s 25(5)).

Will I lose my sick leave while my claim is decided?

You are paid from your personal leave credits while the claim is decided, and if it succeeds the leave is reinstated (SCH013 cl 35.51; WES337 cl 51.15(a)). General information only, not legal advice. If you are dealing with an unreasonable workload, violence at work or an injury, talk to your union or a lawyer about your situation.

More for WA teachers

We use our software to generate this content with AI assistance. General information about the law, not legal advice. Last checked 3 November 2026.