Bank advisers' exit deeds did not sign away their award rights

Macquarie Bank paid its advisers through commission plus a package it called 'Basic Cost Responsibility', part of which was paid as fixed monthly amounts. After leaving, many sued, arguing they had in effect been paid commission only and were owed award wages and leave entitlements. Forty-eight took the case to the Full Federal Court.
Fifteen of the former advisers in the appeals had signed deeds of release on the way out. Nicholas Sandford signed his in May 2015, when he resigned and retired from the industry; it gave him two years of revenue from his former clients and released all present and future claims, including those 'arising under any award'. Many others were signed on redundancy in 2018. The trial judge held that Mr Sandford's and Mr Edwards's deeds barred their claims and ordered them to pay the bank's costs, but that 13 others did not.
The Full Court held that none of the deeds barred the claims. Rights under awards and the Fair Work Act generally cannot be contracted out of. A genuine compromise of an existing dispute about them can bind, but there has to be a dispute to compromise. Nothing in any of the deeds, or their circumstances, pointed to such a dispute; Mr Sandford said he did not then know he had an underpayment claim. None of the money paid under the deeds was said to be for those entitlements. The costs orders against Mr Sandford and Mr Edwards were overturned.
Winning the deeds point did not mean winning the money. Most of the advisers' pay claims failed, including those for wages and for leave and public holiday pay. Only a claim for annual leave loading survived. After the judgment, the bank and the advisers settled, and in August 2023 the Court made consent orders dismissing the proceedings with no order as to costs.
A broad release in an exit deed may not cover your minimum award or National Employment Standards entitlements if there was no dispute about them when you signed. If you think you were underpaid, get advice before assuming a deed has closed the door.
One of the three judges, Snaden J, agreed about the deeds but would have dismissed all of the pay claims ([288]–[289]). The later consent orders are in Wardman v Macquarie Bank Limited (No 2) [2023] FCAFC 125.
A published decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia, retold in plain English. Lawcaptain did not act in this case. Every outcome depends on its own facts. General information, not legal advice about your situation.
Dismissed? Know what your case is worth.
The Employment Case Review checks your facts against real decisions like this one.
For employees in the Fair Work system. Employed by a WA sole trader, partnership, State agency or council? The review isn't for you — see the WA state system.
Settlement deeds
She signed a deed in 2008, then spent a decade trying to undo itFull Court of the Federal Court of Australia · 13 November 2024Read the case study
Told his job was redundant, he signed an 8-page deal on the spotFair Work Commission · 8 July 2025Read the case study
He agreed the money, but not the release, so there was no dealFair Work Commission · 11 July 2023Read the case study