HomeIndustrial hubUnions in the Fair Work systemAwards, wages, labour hire and gig work
Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Parts 2-3, 2-6, 2-7A and 3A

Awards, wages, labour hire and gig work. Four ways minimum pay is set.

Modern awards, the annual wage review, same job same pay orders and minimum standards orders for regulated workers. A union can take part in each. Every figure carries its date.

4.75%rise in modern award minimum wages in the 2026 annual wage review, from the first full pay period on or after 1 July 2026
$1,004.90the national minimum wage a week ($26.44 an hour) from that date
21 daysafter a deactivation or termination took effect, for a gig worker's or road transport contractor's application (s 536LU(3))
A line drawing of a stapled document with coloured index tabs down one edge, lying on a wooden desk beside a highlighter pen and a pencil

Key dates and time limits

StepTimeSource
Annual wage review increases to award minimum wagesOperate from 1 July, and apply to an employee from the first full pay period starting on or after that dayFW Act s 286(1), (5)
2026 national minimum wage and award increasesFrom the first full pay period starting on or after 1 July 2026[2026] FWCFB 3500 at [143], [146]
A variation of an award (other than wages) made on a union's applicationFrom the day specified, which cannot be earlier than the day it is made, unless it corrects an error or ambiguity and there are exceptional circumstancess 165(1), (2)
Same job, same pay: short-term work exemptionWork for a period of no longer than 3 months is exempt, unless the Commission determines otherwises 306G(2)
Unfair deactivation or unfair termination application (gig worker or road transport contractor)21 days after the deactivation or termination took effect, or a further period in exceptional circumstancess 536LU(3), (4)
Court claim to enforce an award, minimum wage order, equal remuneration order, same job same pay order or minimum standards order6 years after the contraventions 544
Annual wage review increases to award minimum wagesTime: Operate from 1 July, and apply to an employee from the first full pay period starting on or after that day
Source
FW Act s 286(1), (5)
2026 national minimum wage and award increasesTime: From the first full pay period starting on or after 1 July 2026
Source
[2026] FWCFB 3500 at [143], [146]
A variation of an award (other than wages) made on a union's applicationTime: From the day specified, which cannot be earlier than the day it is made, unless it corrects an error or ambiguity and there are exceptional circumstances
Source
s 165(1), (2)
Same job, same pay: short-term work exemptionTime: Work for a period of no longer than 3 months is exempt, unless the Commission determines otherwise
Source
s 306G(2)
Show all 6 rowsShow fewer
Unfair deactivation or unfair termination application (gig worker or road transport contractor)Time: 21 days after the deactivation or termination took effect, or a further period in exceptional circumstances
Source
s 536LU(3), (4)
Court claim to enforce an award, minimum wage order, equal remuneration order, same job same pay order or minimum standards orderTime: 6 years after the contravention
Source
s 544

The short version

Minimum pay in the federal system is set in four ways, and a union can take part in each.

Read moreShow less
  1. Modern awards set minimum wages and conditions by industry or occupation. A union can apply to vary an award. Wages can be varied between annual reviews only for "work value reasons", which now include gender undervaluation.
  2. The annual wage review looks at every award wage and the national minimum wage each year, with any increase operating from 1 July. The 2026 review raised award wages by 4.75 per cent and the national minimum wage to $1,004.90 a week ($26.44 an hour), from the first full pay period on or after 1 July 2026.
  3. Same job, same pay orders require a labour hire employer to pay its workers at least what the host's enterprise agreement would pay them. A union can apply for one.
  4. Gig and owner-driver workers who are "employee-like" or "regulated road transport contractors" can now be covered by minimum standards orders and collective agreements, and some can challenge an unfair deactivation. A union can apply for an order and represent the workers.

Words used on this page

  1. A "modern award" is an award made under Part 2-3 of the FW Act. Every modern award has a code beginning MA on the Fair Work Ombudsman's award library.
  2. "Work value reasons" are "reasons justifying the amount that employees should be paid for doing a particular kind of work", related to the nature of the work, the level of skill or responsibility involved, or the conditions under which it is done (s 157(2A)).
  3. A "regulated labour hire arrangement order" is the Commission's same job, same pay order (s 306E). The "protected rate of pay" is what it requires the labour hire employer to pay.
  4. A "regulated worker" is either an "employee-like worker", who does digital platform work (s 15P), or a "regulated road transport contractor" (s 15Q). A "regulated business" is a platform operator or road transport business that engages them.
  5. An "organisation" is a union registered under the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act s 12). Where a union makes one of the applications on this page, it must almost always be an organisation, so a union registered only under State law usually cannot apply.

Making and varying modern awards

The test
  1. For anything other than wages, the Commission may vary, make or revoke a modern award only "if the FWC is satisfied that making the determination or modern award is necessary to achieve the modern awards objective" (s 157(1)).
  2. The modern awards objective is a "fair and relevant minimum safety net of terms and conditions", taking into account the matters in s 134(1). They include:
  1. the need to improve access to secure work (s 134(1)(aa));
  2. the need to achieve gender equality, including by eliminating gender-based undervaluation of work (s 134(1)(ab));
  3. the need to encourage collective bargaining (s 134(1)(b));
  4. the need for additional pay for overtime, unsocial hours, weekend and public holiday work and shifts (s 134(1)(da));
  5. the likely impact on business, employment costs, employment growth, inflation and the national economy (s 134(1)(f), (h)).
  1. "Necessary" means more than desirable. "That which is necessary must be done. That which is desirable does not carry the same imperative for action" (Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association v National Retail Association (No 2) [2012] FCA 480 at [46]).
  2. The exercise is evaluative: the safety net qualities "are broadly conceived and will often involve competing value judgments about broad questions of social and economic policy" (Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association v The Australian Industry Group [2017] FCAFC 161 at [48]-[49]).
  3. Penalty and overtime rates cannot be reduced, and an award cannot trade them away for something else if that would reduce the extra pay (s 135A(1)).
  4. Award minimum wages can be changed outside the annual wage review only for work value reasons (s 157(2)), to correct an error or ambiguity (s 160), or on a referral from the Australian Human Rights Commission (s 161): s 135(1).
Who may apply

The s 158(1) table sets out who may apply. For a union:

  1. to vary an award's terms, an organisation covered by the award, or one "entitled to represent the industrial interests of one or more employers or employees that are covered by the modern award" (item 1);
  2. to widen an award's coverage, an organisation that would become covered, or one entitled to represent employees who would become covered (item 3);
  3. to make a new award, an organisation entitled to represent employees who would be covered (item 7);
  4. to fix an error or ambiguity, an organisation covered by the award or entitled to represent covered employees (s 160(2)).

A state-registered union with no federal registration is not an "organisation" and cannot apply under s 158.

How an application runs
  1. The union lodges form F46 (application to vary a modern award). The F46 asks the applicant to explain how the variation is necessary to achieve the modern awards objective, and the minimum wages objective if it applies.
  2. The Commission is usually constituted by a Full Bench. The President may direct a single Member to make a variation (note 1 to s 157(1)). An Expert Panel must deal with some applications, including a variation that might relate to the Care and Community Sector (s 617(8)) or the road transport industry (s 617(10B)), and a wages determination involving substantive gender pay equity matters (s 617(6), (9)).
  3. The Commission may also act on its own initiative (s 157(3)(a)). In that case unions take part as interested parties.
  4. No permission is needed for a lawyer or paid agent to make written submissions in an award matter (s 596(3)), or to take part in a conference or hearing in a Part 2-3 matter, unless the Commission directs otherwise (Fair Work Commission Rules 2024 r 13(2)(a)(i), (3)). A union's own officers and employees need no permission in any case (s 596(4)(b)(i)).
When a variation takes effect
  1. A variation other than of minimum wages operates from the day specified. It cannot be earlier than the day it is made, unless it is a s 160 variation (error or ambiguity) and there are exceptional circumstances (s 165(1), (2)). It applies to an employee from the first full pay period starting on or after that day (s 165(3)).
  2. A work value variation of minimum wages ordinarily operates from 1 July in the next financial year, but the Commission may specify another day and phase it in (s 166).
  3. If a variation is back-dated, a court cannot impose a penalty for past conduct that breaches the award only because of the back-dating, but it can still order back pay (s 167(3) and note 1).

The annual wage review

  1. The Commission "must conduct and complete an annual wage review in each financial year" (s 285(1)), constituted by an Expert Panel (s 617).
  2. In each review it must review award minimum wages and the national minimum wage order, may vary award minimum wages, and must make a national minimum wage order (s 285(2)).
  3. The minimum wages objective requires a safety net of fair minimum wages, taking into account, among other things, the performance of the economy, gender equality (including eliminating gender-based undervaluation), relative living standards and the needs of the low paid (s 284(1)).
  4. The Commission must give all persons and bodies "a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions", must publish them, and must allow comment on what is published (s 289(1), (2), (5)). Research it undertakes or commissions for the review must be published (s 291). A union cannot apply for a review; it takes part through submissions.
The 2026 review

On 2 June 2026 the Expert Panel decided (Annual Wage Review 2026 [2026] FWCFB 3500):

What changedAmountFromSource
National minimum wage$1,004.90 a week, or $26.44 an hourFirst full pay period on or after 1 July 2026At [4], [142]-[143]
Modern award minimum wage ratesIncreased by 4.75 per cent, subject to the floors belowFirst full pay period on or after 1 July 2026At [5], [144], [146]
Lowest award rate for ongoing employmentAt least $1,004.90 a week, or $26.44 an hourFirst full pay period on or after 1 July 2026At [5], [144]
Lowest entry-level award rate (no more than the first six months)At least $978.10 a week, or $25.74 an hourFirst full pay period on or after 1 July 2026At [5], [144]
Trainee and apprentice rates not expressed as a percentage of another rateIncreased by 4.75 per centFirst full pay period on or after 1 July 2026At [145]-[146]
Casual loading for award/agreement free employees25 per centFirst full pay period on or after 1 July 2026At [142]-[143]
National minimum wageAmount: $1,004.90 a week, or $26.44 an hour
From
First full pay period on or after 1 July 2026
Source
At [4], [142]-[143]
Modern award minimum wage ratesAmount: Increased by 4.75 per cent, subject to the floors below
From
First full pay period on or after 1 July 2026
Source
At [5], [144], [146]
Lowest award rate for ongoing employmentAmount: At least $1,004.90 a week, or $26.44 an hour
From
First full pay period on or after 1 July 2026
Source
At [5], [144]
Lowest entry-level award rate (no more than the first six months)Amount: At least $978.10 a week, or $25.74 an hour
From
First full pay period on or after 1 July 2026
Source
At [5], [144]
Show all 6 rowsShow fewer
Trainee and apprentice rates not expressed as a percentage of another rateAmount: Increased by 4.75 per cent
From
First full pay period on or after 1 July 2026
Source
At [145]-[146]
Casual loading for award/agreement free employeesAmount: 25 per cent
From
First full pay period on or after 1 July 2026
Source
At [142]-[143]

The Panel also decided to phase out the C13 award classification level in three stages, so that the C12 level becomes the lowest rate for ongoing employment. The first stage was part of the 2026 review (at [5]).

An enterprise agreement's base rate of pay must not be less than the award's base rate (s 206), so an award increase can lift members whose agreement rate has fallen behind.

Work value and gender undervaluation

The test
  1. The Commission may vary award minimum wages if satisfied that the variation "is justified by work value reasons" and that making it "outside the system of annual wage reviews is necessary to achieve the modern awards objective" (s 157(2)).
  2. The consideration of work value reasons must "be free of assumptions based on gender" and "include consideration of whether historically the work has been undervalued because of assumptions based on gender" (s 157(2B)).
  3. An Expert Panel has said how the test now works (Gender-based undervaluation – priority awards review [2025] FWCFB 74):
  1. it requires "a broad evaluative judgment involving the exercise of a discretion", and the work value reasons need only be "related to" one or more of the three matters, with a connection that is "relevant and not remote or accidental" (at [23]);
  2. there is no requirement to prove "identified changes in work value measured from a fixed datum point", which the older wage-fixing principles required (at [24]);
  3. the award wage-fixing model from 1989 to 2006 "embedded gender-based undervaluation in four fundamental ways", the first being the use of the C10 tradesperson's rate as "the lodestar for wage fixation" (at [46]).
  1. The same reading has been applied in a union's classification case outside the gender context (Application by The Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union [2025] FWCFB 199 at [138]-[141]).
What the cases have produced
CaseWho appliedResultSource
Aged care, stage 1 (4 November 2022)Unions and individual workersA 15 per cent interim increase for direct care classifications in the Aged Care Award 2010 (MA000018) and the Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry Award 2010 (MA000100, the SCHADS Award), and for nurses in aged care under the Nurses Award 2020 (MA000034), found "plainly justified by work value reasons"Aged Care Award 2010; Nurses Award 2020; Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry Award 2010 [2022] FWCFB 200 at [55]-[56]
Teachers (19 April 2021)The Independent Education UnionRates in the Educational Services (Teachers) Award 2020 (MA000077) "have never been fixed on the basis of a proper assessment of the work value of teachers"Independent Education Union of Australia [2021] FWCFB 2051 at [645]
Priority awards review (16 April 2025)Started by the Commission itself; unions took partGender-based undervaluation found in five awards. For pharmacists under the Pharmacy Industry Award 2020 (MA000012), a total increase of 14.1 per cent in three phases, from 30 June 2025, 30 June 2026 and 30 June 2027. Provisional views only for the others[2025] FWCFB 74 at [16]-[17]
Aged care, stage 1 (4 November 2022)Who applied: Unions and individual workers
Result
A 15 per cent interim increase for direct care classifications in the Aged Care Award 2010 (MA000018) and the Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry Award 2010 (MA000100, the SCHADS Award), and for nurses in aged care under the Nurses Award 2020 (MA000034), found "plainly justified by work value reasons"
Teachers (19 April 2021)Who applied: The Independent Education Union
Result
Rates in the Educational Services (Teachers) Award 2020 (MA000077) "have never been fixed on the basis of a proper assessment of the work value of teachers"
Priority awards review (16 April 2025)Who applied: Started by the Commission itself; unions took part
Result
Gender-based undervaluation found in five awards. For pharmacists under the Pharmacy Industry Award 2020 (MA000012), a total increase of 14.1 per cent in three phases, from 30 June 2025, 30 June 2026 and 30 June 2027. Provisional views only for the others
Source
[2025] FWCFB 74 at [16]-[17]
Equal remuneration orders

An equal remuneration order is a second route. It requires "equal remuneration for men and women workers for work of equal or comparable value" (s 302(1), (2)).

  1. Who may apply: an employee to whom the order would apply, "an employee organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of an employee to whom the order will apply", or the Sex Discrimination Commissioner (s 302(3)).
  2. On such an application, the Commission "must make the equal remuneration order if it is satisfied that, for the employees to whom the order will apply, there is not equal remuneration for work of equal or comparable value" (s 302(5)).
  3. A comparison "is not limited to similar work" and "does not need to be a comparison with an historically male-dominated occupation or industry" (s 302(3B)). The Commission "is not required to find discrimination on the basis of gender" (s 302(3C)).
  4. It must take into account annual wage review orders and their reasons (s 302(4)).
  5. The application form is F46A, and the order is made by an Expert Panel (s 617(7), (10)).

Older decisions need care. In 2015 a Full Bench departed from an earlier Full Bench view that the s 302(5) requirement "could be satisfied by demonstration of 'gender-based undervaluation' without the need for a male comparator" (Application by United Voice & Australian Education Union [2015] FWCFB 8200 at [252], [297]). Section 302 has since been amended, and subsections (3A) to (3C) now say otherwise. Decisions on equal remuneration made before the 2022 amendments should be read with that change in mind. No equal remuneration order decision under the amended s 302 was found.

Same job, same pay: labour hire orders

What an order does

While a regulated labour hire arrangement order is in force, the labour hire employer "must pay the regulated employee at no less than the protected rate of pay" for work done for the host (s 306F(2)). The protected rate is the full rate the employee would get if the host's enterprise agreement or other covered instrument applied (s 306F(4)).

Who may apply
  1. A regulated (supplied) employee, an employee of the host, the host, or "an employee organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of" a supplied employee or a host employee (s 306E(7)). The form is F86.
  2. So a union can apply on the strength of its right to represent the host's own employees, even where few of the supplied workers are members.
When the Commission must make the order
  1. The Commission "must" make the order if satisfied that (s 306E(1)):
  1. an employer supplies, or will supply, employees to perform work for a regulated host;
  2. a covered employment instrument that applies to the host would apply to the employees if the host employed them to do that work;
  3. the host is not a small business employer.
  1. It must not make the order unless satisfied that the work "is not or will not be for the provision of a service, rather than the supply of labour" (s 306E(1A)), having regard to (s 306E(7A)):
  1. the employer's involvement in matters relating to the work;
  2. how far the employer directs, supervises or controls the employees in practice, including rosters, tasks and quality review;
  3. how far the employees use the employer's systems, plant or structures;
  4. whether the employer or another person is subject to industry or professional standards for the employees;
  5. how far the work is specialist or expert.
  1. It must not make the order if satisfied that it is not fair and reasonable to do so, having regard to the s 306E(8) matters "in relation to which submissions have been made" (s 306E(2)). Those matters include pay arrangements, the history of industrial arrangements, the relationship between host and employer, and the terms of the arrangement.
After an order is made
  1. Short-term work. The protected rate does not apply to work for "a period of no longer than 3 months", unless the Commission has determined otherwise (s 306G(2)). A union may apply for a determination that there is no exemption period, but the Commission may make one only in exceptional circumstances (s 306L(1), (4)). If the work in fact runs longer because the agreements are varied or new ones made, the protected rate applies from then (s 306G(3)).
  2. Training arrangements are excepted (s 306G(1)).
  3. Disputes about the protected rate go first to discussion at the workplace, then to the Commission, which may arbitrate (ss 306P, 306Q).
  4. A scheme with the sole or dominant purpose of avoiding an order is prohibited (ss 306S, 306SA), as are specific avoidance arrangements using short-term work, other labour hire agreements or independent contractors (ss 306T to 306V).
  5. A contravention of s 306F(2) and the other listed provisions can be enforced in court by an employee, an employee organisation or an inspector (s 539(2) item 9A).
A contested case: three coal mines

In July 2025 a Full Bench made orders against all three labour hire groups supplying workers to three Queensland coal mines operated for a BHP joint venture (Applications by the Mining and Energy Union re: Goonyella Riverside Mine, Peak Downs Mine and Saraji Mine [2025] FWCFB 134 at [346]). Where supplied workers do "the same work, involving the same skills and expertise" as the host's own employees, as part of the usual operations, the specialist nature of the work carries little weight (at [266]). The Full Court of the Federal Court dismissed the application for judicial review (BHP Coal Pty Ltd v Mining and Energy Union [2025] FCAFC 194 at [8], [83]).

Gig and owner-driver workers: regulated workers

Who is covered
  1. A person is an "employee-like worker" if all of these apply (s 15P(1)):
  1. the person performs all or a significant majority of the work under a services contract;
  2. the work is digital platform work;
  3. none of it is done as an employee;
  4. the person has two or more of: low bargaining power; pay at or below that of an employee doing comparable work; a low degree of authority over the work; or a prescribed characteristic.
  1. A "regulated road transport contractor" is the equivalent for road transport work (s 15Q).
  2. The scheme took effect on 26 August 2024 (Application by Transport Workers' Union of Australia [2026] FWCFB 167 at [1]).
Minimum standards orders
  1. Who may apply: "an organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of one or more regulated workers who would be covered", an organisation representing the businesses, a business in the class, or the Minister (s 536JZ(1)). The application must say which kind of order it seeks and specify the classes of workers and businesses (s 536JZ(2)-(3A)).
  2. Before making an employee-like worker order, the Commission must consider whether, "on the whole", the people in the class are employee-like workers (s 536K(2)). It must publish a notice of intent with a draft order and give affected entities a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions (ss 536KAA, 536KAB).
  3. An order must not contain certain terms, including overtime rates, rostering, terms that change the form of engagement, and work health and safety matters comprehensively dealt with by other laws (s 536KM(1)).
  4. Contravening a minimum standards order is a civil remedy provision. A covered worker, a covered business, "an organisation" or an inspector may apply to court (s 539(2) item 29AB).
The first applications: public record as at 13 November 2026

These matters are live. This is what the published decisions say, with no view on the outcome.

  1. On 28 August 2024 the Transport Workers' Union of Australia (TWU) filed applications for:
  1. an employee-like worker order for "last mile" parcel delivery (MS2024/1);
  2. a road transport order for the same work (MS2024/2);
  3. an employee-like worker order for on-demand food and beverage delivery through platforms (MS2024/3)

(Application by Transport Workers' Union of Australia [2026] FWCFB 154 at [3]).

  1. On 30 June 2026 the Expert Panel dismissed an application to vacate the hearing listings in MS2024/1, and rejected a request to vacate the listings in both MS2024/1 and MS2024/2 ([2026] FWCFB 154 at [1]-[2]).
  2. On 8 July 2026, in MS2024/3, the Panel decided to publish a notice of intent to make an order "broadly consistent with the TWU's proposed MSO", to operate on an interim basis pending the last mile applications ([2026] FWCFB 167 at [14]).
  3. On 14 July 2026, deciding a preliminary question in MS2024/1 and MS2024/2, the Panel held that the TWU's proposed insurance term was not a prohibited term (Application by Transport Workers' Union of Australia [2026] FWCFB 171 at [31]). It declined to strike out a proposed safety training term before hearing the evidence (at [42]-[43]).
  4. MS2024/1 and MS2024/2 were listed for a three-week hearing from 20 July 2026 ([2026] FWCFB 171 at [2]).
  5. On 11 August 2026 the Panel issued [2026] FWCFB 211 and made the Interim On-Demand Delivery Employee-Like Worker Minimum Standards Order (MS900103), order PR813107 (order of 11 August 2026).

As at 13 November 2026 no decision determining MS2024/1 or MS2024/2 was found.

Collective agreements
  1. A collective agreement may be made between a regulated business and "an organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of one or more regulated workers" (s 536MK(1)).
  2. Either side can ask the Commission to help with a dispute about making the agreement, other than by arbitration (s 536MP).
  3. The Commission registers an agreement on a signatory's application with the other's consent, if the requirements in ss 536MR and 536MS are met, including an independent dispute settlement term.
  4. A covered worker, a covered business or an organisation may enforce a collective agreement in court (s 539(2) item 29AD).
Unfair deactivation and unfair termination
  1. An employee-like worker who has worked through a digital labour platform "on a regular basis for a period of at least 6 months" is protected from unfair deactivation (s 536LD). There is a parallel protection from unfair termination for regulated road transport contractors (s 536LE).
  2. A deactivation is unfair if the person was deactivated, the deactivation was unfair, and it was "not consistent with the Digital Labour Platform Deactivation Code" (s 536LF).
  3. Only "a person who has been deactivated or terminated" may apply, within 21 days after the deactivation or termination took effect (s 536LU(1), (3)). A union represents the worker; it cannot apply in its own name.
  4. The person's annual rate of earnings must be less than the contractor high income threshold (s 536LU(2)). The threshold was $175,000 for the year from 1 July 2024 and is indexed each 1 July (Fair Work Regulations reg 1.08AA(2), (3)). The Commission gives it as $190,100 for the year starting 1 July 2026 (Commission page on the contractor high income threshold, read 13 November 2026).
  5. The remedy is reactivation, with an order to restore lost pay (ss 536LP(1), 536LQ). The Commission "must not order the payment of compensation" (s 536LP(3)).
Unfair contract terms

A party to a services contract, or "an organisation that represents the industrial interests of a person who is party to a services contract", may apply for a remedy on the basis that the contract contains an unfair term (s 536ND(1)). The person's earnings must be below the contractor high income threshold in the year of the application (s 536ND(2)).

Standing in court for regulated workers: an open question

For minimum standards orders, collective agreements, deactivation orders and unfair contract term orders, the s 539(2) table names "an organisation" as an applicant (items 29AB to 29AE).

  1. Section 540(6) says an "industrial association" may apply only if it is affected, or the person concerned is affected and the association is entitled to represent that person (s 540(6)).
  2. "Industrial association" includes an organisation (s 12).
  3. Section 540(7), which expressly brings organisations under s 540(6), applies only where an item names "an industrial association".
  4. Item 29AF, for road transport contractual chain orders, names "an organisation entitled to represent the interests of the first person". Items 29AB to 29AE do not add those words.

Whether s 540(6) limits a union applying under items 29AB to 29AE is a point no decision settles.

For unions and industrial officers

Send us the job. Get back cited research and a first draft.

Agreement interpretation, disputes, FWC applications and show-cause replies. Built on more than 400,000 Australian decisions, with a separate checking pass on every draft.

Decided cases

What the Commission and the courts decided.

Published decisions, retold in plain English from the decision itself. Each links to the full text. Lawcaptain did not act in these cases.

Award wages up 4.75 per centFair Work Commission Expert Panel (Justice Hatcher, President, and six other members) · 2 June 2026

The 2026 annual wage review: 4.75 per cent, and the start of the end for the C13 rate

Every year the Commission reviews every award wage and the national minimum wage. In 2026 it also decided to phase out the lowest classification level for ongoing work.

Read the full storyShow less

Result. Award minimum wages up 4.75 per cent and the national minimum wage to $1,004.90 a week, both from the first full pay period starting on or after 1 July 2026.

The Expert Panel heard submissions from "a wide range of parties including employer and union organisations, and federal and State Governments" ([3]).

It decided that the national minimum wage would rise to $1,004.90 a week, or $26.44 an hour ([4]). Modern award minimum wages would rise by 4.75 per cent, subject to a structural change for the lowest classifications ([5]).

That change phases out award classifications paid at the C13 level in three stages, the first in this review, so that the C12 level becomes the lowest rate for ongoing employment. As a result, the lowest award rate for ongoing employment became $1,004.90 a week ($26.44 an hour), and the lowest entry-level rate, for no more than the first six months, $978.10 a week ($25.74 an hour) ([5], [144]).

The order and the award variations operate from 1 July 2026, and apply to each employee from their first full pay period starting on or after that date ([143], [146]). No award was deferred.

In the decision's words: "We will do this in three stages, with the first stage being implemented as part of this Review." (at [5])

What it means for you

From the first full pay period on or after 1 July 2026, check members' pay against the new award rates. An enterprise agreement's base rate cannot fall below the award's (s 206), so the review can lift members on agreements too.

Won in part by the unionsFair Work Commission Full Bench (Justice Ross, President, Deputy President Asbury, Deputy President O'Neill) · 4 November 2022

Aged care: a 15 per cent interim increase "plainly justified by work value reasons"

Unions and individual aged care workers applied for a 25 per cent increase in award wages. After hearing evidence from workers, union officials and experts, a Full Bench decided an interim increase of 15 per cent for direct care workers was clearly justified.

Read the full storyShow less

Result. Won in part by the unions at this stage: a 15 per cent interim increase for direct care workers, with further increases left to a later stage.

The applications sought to vary three awards: the Aged Care Award, the Nurses Award and the SCHADS Award (cover page). Evidence came from employees, union officials, experts and employer witnesses.

The Full Bench was satisfied that "a 15 per cent interim increase in minimum wages of the direct care classifications in the Aged Care and SCHADS Awards and for nurses working in aged care covered by the Nurses Award is 'plainly justified by work value reasons' as required by s.157(2)" ([55]).

It did not finish there. It said this did not conclude the claim for other aged care employees, such as administrative and support staff, and did not necessarily exhaust the increase work value might justify for direct care workers ([56]). Those questions went to a later stage.

In the decision's words: "Nor are we suggesting that the 15 per cent interim increase necessarily exhausts the extent of the increase justified by work value reasons in respect of direct care aged care employees." (at [56])

What it means for you

A work value case can be run in stages, with an interim increase where the case for some increase is clear. Evidence from workers about what the job actually involves was central.

Won by the unionFair Work Commission Full Bench (Vice President Hatcher, Deputy President Dean, Deputy President Saunders) · 19 April 2021

Teachers: award rates "never ... fixed on the basis of a proper assessment" of the work

The teachers' union applied for an equal remuneration order and a work value increase for the Teachers Award. The Full Bench found the award rates had never been properly set against the value of a teacher's work.

Read the full storyShow less

Result. Won by the union on the work value question: an adjustment to the teachers' award rates was justified.

The Independent Education Union of Australia applied to vary the Teachers Award (cover page: s 158), alongside an earlier equal remuneration application (s 302).

The Full Bench was satisfied that the award's rates "have never been fixed on the basis of a proper assessment of the work value of teachers", did not recognise that teachers are degree-qualified professionals, and did not reflect substantial changes in the work over time ([645]).

The Full Bench noted that the statute did not adopt the old wage-fixing requirement of a "significant net addition to work requirements" ([167]). It still measured change in teachers' work from a 1996 starting point ([588]) and found a significant net addition to their work value ([645]). In 2025 an Expert Panel said the current s 157(2A) does not require changes measured from a fixed datum point ([2025] FWCFB 74 at [24]).

In the decision's words: "never been fixed on the basis of a proper assessment of the work value of teachers" (at [645])

What it means for you

Where an award rate was never set by a proper work value assessment, that history can itself be a work value reason. Under the current test, the union need not prove change from a fixed starting point.

Undervaluation found in five awardsFair Work Commission Expert Panel (Justice Hatcher, President, Vice President Asbury, Deputy Presidents O'Neill, Slevin and Grayson) · 16 April 2025

Pharmacists and workers under four other awards: gender-based undervaluation found

The Commission decided, on its own initiative, to review whether classifications in five female-dominated awards had been undervalued because of gender. Unions took part. The Panel found they had.

Read the full storyShow less

Result. Gender-based undervaluation found in five awards. A 14.1 per cent increase for pharmacists, in three phases; provisional views for the others.

The review was started by the Commission itself in the 2024 annual wage review decision, under its power to act on its own initiative (s 157(3)(a)) ([1]). Unions took part, and union applications about the Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry Award were heard with it ([4]-[5]).

The Panel explained the test. Whether work value reasons justify a variation calls for "a broad evaluative judgment" ([23]). There is no requirement to prove "identified changes in work value measured from a fixed datum point" ([24]). The award wage-fixing system from 1989 to 2006 "embedded gender-based undervaluation in four fundamental ways", starting with the use of the C10 tradesperson's rate as "the lodestar" for wage fixing ([46]).

It found gender-based undervaluation for pharmacists under the Pharmacy Award, health professionals, pathology collectors and dental assistants under the Health Professionals and Support Services Award 2020 (MA000027), several groups under the SCHADS Award, dental assistants and dental and oral therapists under the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Workers and Practitioners and Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services Award 2020 (MA000115), and children's services employees under the Children's Services Award 2010 (MA000120) ([16]).

For pharmacists it fixed a total increase of 14.1 per cent in three phases, from 30 June 2025, 30 June 2026 and 30 June 2027. For the other awards it gave provisional views ([17]).

In the decision's words: "It is significant that s 157(2A) does not contain any requirement for work value reasons justifying the variation of modern award minimum wages to consist of identified changes in work value measured from a fixed datum point." (at [24])

What it means for you

Unions do not need to be the applicant to win a work value increase. Taking part in a Commission-initiated review, with evidence about the work and how its rates were set, can be enough.

Won by the unionsFair Work Commission Full Bench (Vice President Asbury, Vice President Gibian, Commissioner Durham) · 7 July 2025

Same job, same pay at three Bowen Basin coal mines

Labour hire workers from three groups worked alongside BHP Coal's own employees at three Queensland coal mines. The Mining and Energy Union and the AMWU applied for orders that they be paid at least the host's agreement rates. The labour hire entities said they were providing a service, not labour.

Read the full storyShow less

Result. Won by the unions: regulated labour hire arrangement orders made on every application. Judicial review dismissed by the Full Court of the Federal Court ([2025] FCAFC 194)

The mines are run for a joint venture in which BHP group entities hold half ([2]). The unions applied for orders covering employees of the BHP-owned OS entities, WorkPac and Chandler Macleod ([1]).

The Full Bench began with the structure of s 306E: subsection (1) "imposes an obligation on the Commission ('must')" to make an order if its conditions are met, and the service and fairness tests then qualify it ([16]).

On the service question, it said cases about "labour hire" under insurance policies were of limited help ([48]). It gave little weight to the specialist nature of the work, because "BHP Coal employees perform the same work, involving the same skills and expertise, and the performance of that work is part of the usual operations of the mines" ([266]).

It made orders on each application ([346]). The Full Court of the Federal Court later dismissed BHP's application for judicial review (BHP Coal Pty Ltd v Mining and Energy Union [2025] FCAFC 194 at [8]).

In the decision's words: "Section 306E(1) imposes an obligation on the Commission ('must') to make a regulated labour hire order if it is satisfied that the matters in subsections (a), (b) and (c) are met." (at [16])

What it means for you

Where supplied workers do the same work as the host's employees, as part of the host's ordinary operations, it is hard to call the arrangement a service. Evidence from workers about who rosters, directs and equips them goes to the heart of the case.

Order made on agreed factsFair Work Commission (Justice Hatcher, President) · 1 May 2025

A rail labour hire order made by consent

A rail union applied for a same job, same pay order for rail operations workers supplied by a labour hire company to Aurizon in New South Wales. The host and the union agreed the facts, the labour hire employers did not object, and the order was made on the agreed terms.

Read the full storyShow less

Result. Order made, operating from 4 May 2025, on agreed facts.

The Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union applied for an order covering employees of Railtrain supplied to Aurizon. The employers said they neither objected nor wished to raise any issue ([2]). The union and Aurizon agreed the terms of a proposed order and a statement of agreed facts ([3]).

The President made four findings ([6]-[9]):

(a) the union was entitled to represent the industrial interests of the supplied employees, and so could apply;

(b) the s 306E(1) conditions were met: the employers supplied employees for rail operations work, the host's agreement would apply if Aurizon employed them, and Aurizon was not a small business;

(c) the work was not the provision of a service, because Aurizon managed and rostered the work, the employees followed its policies and its safety system, used its rolling stock, and did substantially the same work as its own employees;

(d) no submissions were made on the fairness matters, so there was nothing to weigh.

The Commission was therefore "required by s 306E" to make the order, which operated from 4 May 2025 ([10]).

In the decision's words: "I am satisfied that the RTBU is entitled to represent the industrial interests of the employees supplied by the employers to Aurizon and therefore entitled to apply for a regulated labour hire arrangement order under s 306E(7)(c)." (at [6])

What it means for you

Not every same job, same pay application is a fight. Where the facts about control, rostering and equipment are clear, an agreed statement of facts can bring an order quickly.

Won by the driverFair Work Commission Full Bench (Deputy President Saunders, Deputy President Farouque, Commissioner Thornton) · 23 September 2025

An Uber driver reactivated: no compensation, but lost pay restored

A rideshare driver was deactivated by Uber after more than four years and applied for an unfair deactivation remedy. Uber reactivated him just before filing its response and said nothing more could be ordered. The Full Bench disagreed.

Read the full storyShow less

Result. Won by the driver: reactivation ordered, with an order to restore lost pay to follow.

The driver had worked through the Uber platform since November 2020 and was deactivated on 8 April 2025 ([1]). He applied on 24 April 2025, within the 21 days ([2]). On 19 May 2025, just before filing its response, Uber reactivated him ([3]). Uber then said the application should be dismissed because no further remedy was available. The driver, represented by the Transport Workers' Union, disagreed ([4]).

The Full Bench found that he was protected from unfair deactivation, had been deactivated, and that the deactivation was unfair ([135]). It made a reactivation order and said it would make an order to restore lost pay once the parties had conferred on the amount ([133], [136]). That order "will not constitute the payment of compensation", which s 536LP prohibits ([134]).

In the decision's words: "Such an order will not constitute the payment of compensation ... which is prohibited by s 536LP of the Act." (at [134])

What it means for you

A platform cannot end an unfair deactivation case simply by reactivating the worker. Lost pay can still be restored. The worker must apply personally within 21 days, but the union can run the case.

Still runningFair Work Commission Expert Panel for the road transport industry (Justice Hatcher, President, Vice President Asbury, Commissioner Connolly) · 30 June to 11 August 2026

The first minimum standards applications for gig and delivery workers (public record)

In August 2024 the Transport Workers' Union filed the first applications for minimum standards for gig and owner-driver delivery workers. Here is what the published decisions say so far.

Read the full storyShow less

Result. Live. An interim on-demand delivery order was made on 11 August 2026. As at 13 November 2026, no decision on the last mile applications was found.

On 28 August 2024, two days after the scheme took effect, the TWU applied for three orders: an employee-like worker order and a road transport order for "last mile" parcel delivery (MS2024/1 and MS2024/2), and an employee-like worker order for on-demand food and beverage delivery through platforms (MS2024/3) ([2026] FWCFB 154 at [3]; [2026] FWCFB 167 at [1]-[2]).

On 30 June 2026 the Panel dismissed an application by Amazon to vacate the hearing listings in MS2024/1, and rejected a similar request by the Australian Industry Group ([2026] FWCFB 154 at [1]-[2]).

On 8 July 2026, in the food delivery matter, the Panel decided to publish a notice of intent to make an order "broadly consistent with the TWU's proposed MSO", to operate on an interim basis pending the last mile applications ([2026] FWCFB 167 at [14]).

On 14 July 2026, on a preliminary question in the last mile matters, the Panel held that the TWU's proposed insurance term was not a prohibited term ([2026] FWCFB 171 at [31]). It declined to strike out a proposed safety training term before hearing evidence, and said the TWU bears the burden of persuasion on that term ([42]-[43]). The last mile matters were listed for a three-week hearing from 20 July 2026 ([2]).

On 11 August 2026 the Panel issued [2026] FWCFB 211 and made the Interim On-Demand Delivery Employee-Like Worker Minimum Standards Order (order PR813107).

In the decision's words: "We intend that the proposed MSO, if ultimately made, will operate on an interim basis only pending the determination of the 'last mile' delivery applications." ([2026] FWCFB 167 at [14])

What it means for you

A union can now seek legally binding minimum standards for workers who are not employees. The process involves a notice of intent and a draft order on which affected businesses can comment before anything is made.

Show more case studies (6)(6)Show fewer
Worked examples

How it plays out, step by step.

Illustrative example, not a real case

Labour hire workers at a distribution centre

A union covers the warehouse staff employed by a large retailer under its enterprise agreement. The retailer also uses 60 workers supplied by a labour hire company, who do the same picking and packing on the same shifts but are paid under the award.

Walk through itShow less
  1. Standing. The union is entitled to represent the retailer's own employees, so it may apply even if few of the supplied workers are members (s 306E(7)(c)). The form is F86.
  2. The three conditions. The labour hire company supplies employees to work for the retailer; the retailer's agreement would apply to them if it employed them; and the retailer is not a small business employer (s 306E(1)).
  3. Service or labour. Evidence from the workers matters most: who rosters them, who assigns their tasks, whose equipment and systems they use, who checks their work, and whether they do the same work as the retailer's own staff (s 306E(7A); [2025] FWCFB 134 at [266]; [2025] FWC 1217 at [8]).
  4. Fairness. The Commission considers the s 306E(8) matters only if someone makes submissions on them (s 306E(2)).
  5. Short placements. If the retailer rotates workers out before 3 months, the union may ask for a determination that there be no exemption period, which needs exceptional circumstances (ss 306G(2), 306L(4)).
  6. After an order. If the workers are not paid the protected rate, the employee, the union or an inspector may enforce it in court (s 539(2) item 9A).
Illustrative example, not a real case

A food delivery rider is deactivated

A rider who has delivered through a platform app regularly for two years is deactivated on Tuesday 3 November 2026 after a customer complaint. The rider is a union member.

Walk through itShow less
  1. Is the rider protected? The rider must be an employee-like worker who has worked through the platform on a regular basis for at least 6 months (ss 15P, 536LD), with earnings below the contractor high income threshold, which the Commission gives as $190,100 for the year starting 1 July 2026 (s 536LU(2)).
  2. The 21-day clock. The application must be made within 21 days after the deactivation took effect (s 536LU(3)). Counting from the next day, the 21st day is Tuesday 24 November 2026. A later application needs exceptional circumstances (s 536LU(4)).
  3. Who applies. Only the rider can apply (s 536LU(1)). The union can represent the rider, as the Transport Workers' Union did in [2025] FWCFB 214 at [4].
  4. The test. The deactivation must be unfair and not consistent with the Digital Labour Platform Deactivation Code (s 536LF).
  5. The remedy. Reactivation and restoration of lost pay, but no compensation (s 536LP(3); [2025] FWCFB 214 at [134]). Reactivating the rider does not by itself end the claim ([2025] FWCFB 214 at [135]-[136]).
Illustrative example, not a real case

Checking pay after 1 July 2026

A delegate is asked whether members' pay went up after the 2026 annual wage review. Some members are paid award rates; others are on an enterprise agreement made in 2024.

Walk through itShow less
  1. When. Increases apply from each employee's first full pay period starting on or after 1 July 2026 ([2026] FWCFB 3500 at [143], [146]; s 286(5)).
  2. Award members. Their award minimum rate rose by 4.75 per cent, and no ongoing award rate can be below $1,004.90 a week ([2026] FWCFB 3500 at [144]).
  3. Agreement members. The agreement's own increases apply, but the base rate of pay under the agreement must not be less than the award's base rate (s 206). If the new award rate is higher, the member is entitled to at least the award rate.
  4. Underpayment. If members were underpaid, the union may sue for the difference, with interest, within 6 years (ss 544, 547). For award members it applies under s 539(2) item 2. For agreement members it applies under item 4, which requires the agreement to apply to the union.
Questions

The things people ask.

When did the 2026 minimum wage increase start?

From the first full pay period starting on or after 1 July 2026, for both the national minimum wage and modern award minimum wages ([2026] FWCFB 3500 at [143], [146]).

What is the national minimum wage from 1 July 2026?

$1,004.90 a week, or $26.44 an hour, from the first full pay period starting on or after 1 July 2026 ([2026] FWCFB 3500 at [4], [143]).

Can a union apply for a pay rise between annual wage reviews?

Only for work value reasons, to correct an error or ambiguity, or on a referral from the Australian Human Rights Commission (s 135(1)). A work value application needs the Commission to be satisfied that the variation is justified by work value reasons and necessary to achieve the modern awards objective (s 157(2)).

Does a work value case have to show the work has changed?

No. The Act does not require "identified changes in work value measured from a fixed datum point" ([2025] FWCFB 74 at [24]). The reasons need only relate to the nature of the work, the skill or responsibility involved, or the conditions of the work (s 157(2A)).

Must the Commission consider gender in a work value case?

Yes. The consideration must be free of assumptions based on gender and must include whether the work has historically been undervalued because of gender (s 157(2B)).

Can a union apply for an equal remuneration order?

Yes, if it is entitled to represent the industrial interests of an employee the order would cover (s 302(3)(b)(ii)). If the Commission is satisfied that there is not equal remuneration for work of equal or comparable value, it must make the order (s 302(5)).

Who can apply for a same job, same pay order?

A supplied employee, an employee of the host, the host, or a union entitled to represent either kind of employee (s 306E(7)).

Does same job, same pay apply to short labour hire placements?

Not to work for a period of no longer than 3 months, unless the Commission has determined a different exemption period or no exemption period (s 306G(2)). A determination of no exemption period needs exceptional circumstances (s 306L(4)).

Can a union bring an unfair deactivation claim for a gig worker?

No. Only the person who was deactivated may apply (s 536LU(1)), within 21 days (s 536LU(3)). A union can represent the worker.

Can the Commission order compensation for an unfair deactivation?

No. It may order reactivation and restoration of lost pay, but "must not order the payment of compensation" (s 536LP(3)).

Has a minimum standards order been made for gig workers?

Yes, one: the Interim On-Demand Delivery Employee-Like Worker Minimum Standards Order, made on 11 August 2026 (PR813107). As at 13 November 2026 no decision determining the last mile delivery applications (MS2024/1 and MS2024/2) was found.