HomeIndustrial hubWA police officers
Industrial hub · Police officers · Western Australia

WA police officers. Your office, your rights and your time limits.

Your agreements and pay, discipline, loss-of-confidence removal and appeals, injury and medical retirement, and how bargaining works. What decides your position is the appointment you hold under the Police Act 1892 (WA). Every point cites the Act, the regulation, the clause or the decision it comes from.

Three police officers, two men and a woman, stand talking beside a patrol car outside a low suburban police station with a gum tree

Which appointment do you hold?

Your appointment under the Police Act decides your agreement, your discipline and removal routes, your time limits and your injury scheme.

System
Western Australian system
Agreement or award
The Western Australia Police Force Industrial Agreement 2024 (the Police Agreement 2024), cl 5.1
Union
WA Police Union
If you are removed
Loss of confidence: s 33L and s 8. Appeal under s 33P to the WAIRC within 28 days after removal (s 33P(3))

Holds an office, appointed by the Commissioner of Police subject to the Governor's approval (Police Act s 7(1)). Not a public service officer. Discipline: s 23, then the Police Appeal Board within 14 days (ss 33E, 33F(1)). Read about your appointment

Time limits that cannot be missed

14 daysto appeal a discipline punishment to the Police Appeal Board, from the date it is given · Police Act s 33F(1)
21 daysfor written submissions after a notice of loss of confidence · Police Act s 33L(2)
28 daysafter the day of removal, to appeal a loss-of-confidence removal to the WAIRC. Probably cannot be extended, and no decision settles it: work to 28 days from removal · Police Act s 33P(3)
28 daysafter the retirement day, to appeal a medical retirement · Police Act s 33ZI(4)(a)

Snapshot

  1. Who this covers: sworn officers of the Western Australia Police Force from recruit to Commander, Aboriginal police liaison officers and police auxiliary officers. The chooser below also places officers above Commander, special constables, police staff and school traffic wardens.
  2. The system: the Western Australian system, for every group. What decides your position is the appointment you hold under the Police Act 1892 (WA) (Police Act), not your employer or your rank alone. The forums are the Police Appeal Board, the Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission (WAIRC) and the Police Compensation Tribunal.
  3. The main instruments:
    1. the Western Australia Police Force Industrial Agreement 2024 (WES338), registered 13 May 2025 ([2025] WAIRC 00286), for sworn officers and liaison officers, with a term to 30 June 2027 (cl 4.1);
    2. the Western Australia Police Force Auxiliary Officers Industrial Agreement 2024 (WES339), registered 10 February 2026 ([2026] WAIRC 00076), for auxiliary officers, in force until 1 November 2027 or until a replacement is registered (cl 5.1).
  4. The union: the WA Police Union (the Western Australian Police Union of Workers). The Civil Service Association of Western Australia is also a party to the auxiliary officers' agreement (Police Auxiliary Officers Agreement cl 1.3).
  5. Last checked: 7 November 2026. Every pay figure below carries its date. Re-check when either agreement is replaced.

General information, not legal advice. The time limits on this page are short, and at least two of them should be treated as final.

Three routes that do not mix

Police differ from almost every other occupation because the question "can I be removed, and how do I challenge it?" has three separate answers. Each has its own decision maker, test, forum and clock.

Read moreShow less
DisciplineLoss-of-confidence removalMedical retirement
PowerPolice Act s 23Police Act s 8 and s 33LPolice Act Part IIC
TestAn offence against the discipline of the Force (Police Force Regulations 1979 (WA) r 1601)The Commissioner of Police "does not have confidence in a member's suitability to continue as a member, having regard to the member's integrity, honesty, competence, performance or conduct" (s 33L(1))The member is medically unfit (s 33ZD(1)(b); s 33ZE(2)(b))
Appeal toPolice Appeal Board (s 33E)WAIRC, constituted by not less than 3 industrial Commissioners (s 33P(4))WAIRC, constituted by not less than 3 industrial Commissioners (s 33ZI(5))
Time limit14 days from the date the punishment, decision or finding is given (s 33F(1))28 days after removal (s 33P(3))28 days after the retirement day (s 33ZI(4)(a))
Who carries the burdenNot stated in Part IIAThe appellant "at all times" (s 33Q(2), (3))The appellant at all times (s 33ZJ)
If you succeedThe Board may confirm, modify or reverse, or make another just order (s 33H(1A))The removal may be ordered to be of no effect or, only if that is impracticable, compensation capped at 12 months' remuneration (s 33U)The retirement may be ordered to be of no effect or, only if that is impracticable, compensation capped at 12 months' remuneration (s 33ZM)
PowerDiscipline: Police Act s 23
Loss-of-confidence removal
Police Act s 8 and s 33L
Medical retirement
Police Act Part IIC
TestDiscipline: An offence against the discipline of the Force (Police Force Regulations 1979 (WA) r 1601)
Loss-of-confidence removal
The Commissioner of Police "does not have confidence in a member's suitability to continue as a member, having regard to the member's integrity, honesty, competence, performance or conduct" (s 33L(1))
Medical retirement
The member is medically unfit (s 33ZD(1)(b); s 33ZE(2)(b))
Appeal toDiscipline: Police Appeal Board (s 33E)
Loss-of-confidence removal
WAIRC, constituted by not less than 3 industrial Commissioners (s 33P(4))
Medical retirement
WAIRC, constituted by not less than 3 industrial Commissioners (s 33ZI(5))
Time limitDiscipline: 14 days from the date the punishment, decision or finding is given (s 33F(1))
Loss-of-confidence removal
28 days after removal (s 33P(3))
Medical retirement
28 days after the retirement day (s 33ZI(4)(a))
Show all 6 rowsShow fewer
Who carries the burdenDiscipline: Not stated in Part IIA
Loss-of-confidence removal
The appellant "at all times" (s 33Q(2), (3))
Medical retirement
The appellant at all times (s 33ZJ)
If you succeedDiscipline: The Board may confirm, modify or reverse, or make another just order (s 33H(1A))
Loss-of-confidence removal
The removal may be ordered to be of no effect or, only if that is impracticable, compensation capped at 12 months' remuneration (s 33U)
Medical retirement
The retirement may be ordered to be of no effect or, only if that is impracticable, compensation capped at 12 months' remuneration (s 33ZM)

A discharge or dismissal imposed as a disciplinary punishment under Part II is not removal under Part IIB, and no s 33P appeal lies from it ([2023] WAIRC 00140 at [18]–[23]). Unfair dismissal under s 29 of the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA) (IR Act) is not a route for any of these: the Commission does not have jurisdiction over a matter relating to or arising from the removal, discharge, dismissal or cancellation of the appointment of a police officer, auxiliary officer or liaison officer (IR Act Sch 3 cl 2(3)). The appeals in the table come from the Police Act itself.

Which appointment do you hold?

Find your appointment in the first column. "Not this guide" means the row places you in the right system and names the right union, but the guide does not explain that group's rights.

Read moreShow less
Your appointmentLegal statusSystemInstrumentDiscipline routeRemoval route and time limitMedical retirementInjury scheme
Sworn officer, constable to senior sergeantHolds an office, appointed by the Commissioner of Police subject to the Governor's approval (Police Act s 7(1)). Not a public service officer. The IR Act applies "as if" the officer were a government officer and the Commissioner of Police the employer (Sch 3 cl 2(2))WAPolice Agreement 2024 (cl 5.1)s 23, then Police Appeal Board within 14 days (ss 33E, 33F(1)). The Board's decision is final (s 33H(1A))Loss of confidence: s 33L and s 8. Appeal under s 33P to the WAIRC within 28 days after removal (s 33P(3))Part IIC: Commissioner of Police with the Minister's approval (s 33ZE(7)). Appeal within 28 days after the retirement day (s 33ZI(4)(a))Not a worker under the workers' compensation Act unless the officer dies of the injury (WCIM Regulations r 16(2)). Regulations rr 1304, 1306; Police Agreement cl 38.5, cl 41.1; Part 2D if medically retired; the 2008 Act after leaving
Recruit in training or probationary constableAppointed as a member. Probation is 2 years, which the Commissioner of Police may shorten or lengthen (Regulations r 505A(1), (3)). Police cadets are different: they are not members of the Police Force (s 7(2))WAThe Police Agreement 2024 (Recruits-in-Training row, cl 10.1)As for sworn officers: s 23, Police Appeal Board, 14 daysRegulations r 505A(2): the Commissioner of Police's opinion that the member "will not give satisfactory service", with the Minister's approval. Section 33L does not condition it (s 8(4)). On the text there is no s 33P appeal, so no time limit ([2005] WAIRC 01496 at [31]–[32], one Commissioner)Part IIC on the text (s 33ZB)As for sworn officers
Aboriginal police liaison officerAppointed by the Commissioner of Police under Part IIIA (s 38B). Not a member of the Police Force for the purposes of the Act (s 38D(1)). No decision found on the status of the current office. IR Act Sch 3 cl 2(3) names the office; cl 2(2) does notWAThe Police Agreement 2024 (cl 5.1)s 23, then Police Appeal Board within 14 days (s 33E, s 33F(1))Cancellation after s 33L (s 33K; s 38B(4)). Appeal under s 33P within 28 days after removalPart IIC: Commissioner of Police alone (s 33ZE(8)). Appeal within 28 days after the retirement day (s 33ZI)Same as sworn officers (WCIM Regulations r 16(2)). Regulations Part XIII (r 104); Part 2D (s 33ZS(1)); the 2008 Act (s 3(1))
Police auxiliary officerAppointed by the Commissioner of Police under Part IIIB (s 38G). Not a member of the Police Force for the purposes of the Act (s 38I(1)). A Full Bench reasoned, in a rules decision, that the office "can be said to arise by way of a contract of service" ([2011] WAIRC 00786, heading at [228]–[235]). IR Act Sch 3 cl 2(3) names the office; cl 2(2) does not, and its reach is openWAPolice Auxiliary Officers Agreement 2024 (cl 3.1)s 23, including cancellation (s 23(4)(f)), then Police Appeal Board within 14 days, including from being removed from the office (s 33E; s 33F(1))Appointment is subject to Part IIB (s 38G(4)): s 33L, then s 33P, within 28 days after removalPart IIC: Commissioner of Police alone (s 33ZE(8)). Appeal within 28 days after the retirement day (s 33ZI)Rule 16 does not catch you. You are probably a worker under the Workers Compensation and Injury Management Act 2023 (WA) (WCIM Act) s 12(2)(a), but no decision settles it. Not Regulations Part XIII (r 105), not Part 2D (s 33ZS(1)). The 2008 Act, on its words, names police officers and liaison officers only (s 3(1))
Commissioned officer: Inspector, Superintendent, CommanderHolds a commission, appointed by the Governor and "subject to the control and discipline of the Commissioner of Police" (s 6). Holds an office, as sworn officers doWAThe Police Agreement 2024 for pay and conditions (cl 10.1(g)). Police (Commissioned Officers) Industrial Agreement, No 49 of 1976 (POL001), despite its title, deals only with rank ratioss 23, examined by an officer of the rank named in s 23(2). Orders for demotion, salary reduction, suspension, discharge or dismissal need the Governor's confirmation (s 23(5)), which waits for the appeal (s 23(6)). Police Appeal Board within 14 daysRemoval by the Governor (s 8(1)) after s 33L; the removal action is a recommendation that the Minister advise the Governor (s 33K). Appeal under s 33P within 28 days after removalPart IIC: by the Governor (s 33ZE(6)). Appeal within 28 days after the retirement day (s 33ZI)As for sworn officers
Above Commander: Assistant and Deputy CommissionerOfficer ranks (Regulations r 201), appointed by the Governor (s 6). On the text, commissioned officers under s 33K and s 33ZB. Not tested in anything read for this guideWANo agreement: excluded by Police Agreement 2024 cl 5.1 and the Police Award 1965 cl 4. The Salaries and Allowances Tribunal sets their ratesOn the text, as for commissioned officers. Not testedOn the text, as for commissioned officers. Not testedOn the text, by the Governor. Not testedOn the text, as for sworn officers
Special constableAppointed by the Commissioner of Police under Part III (s 35). Not a member of the Police Force for the purposes of the Act (s 37(1))WANone foundNot under s 23. No appeal providedCancellation at any time (s 35(4)). IR Act Sch 3 cl 2(3) excludes the Commission. No appeal providedNot Part IICNot found. Not this guide
Police staffPublic service officers under the Public Sector Management Act 1994 (WA) (PSMA), with the Commissioner of Police as chief executive officer (s 4(3)) and employing authority (s 5)WAWestern Australia Police Agency Specific Agreement 2016 (WES321) with the Public Sector CSA Agreement 2024 (PUB072). Union: the Civil Service Association, not the WA Police Union. Not this guidePSMA Part 5. Decisions go to the Commission under PSMA s 78 and IR Act s 29(1)(i), not the Police Appeal Board. Not this guideNot this guideNot Part IICWorkers on WCIM Act s 12(2)(a), not excluded by r 16. Not this guide
School traffic warden, on-road assessor or survey officerNot a Police Act appointee. Appointed under the Road Traffic Act 1974 (WA) s 7, according to the agreementWAWestern Australia Police School Traffic Wardens Agreement 2011 (WES312). Union: the Civil Service Association. Not this guideNot this guideNot this guideNoNot this guide
Sworn officer, constable to senior sergeantLegal status: Holds an office, appointed by the Commissioner of Police subject to the Governor's approval (Police Act s 7(1)). Not a public service officer. The IR Act applies "as if" the officer were a government officer and the Commissioner of Police the employer (Sch 3 cl 2(2))
System
WA
Instrument
Police Agreement 2024 (cl 5.1)
Discipline route
s 23, then Police Appeal Board within 14 days (ss 33E, 33F(1)). The Board's decision is final (s 33H(1A))
Removal route and time limit
Loss of confidence: s 33L and s 8. Appeal under s 33P to the WAIRC within 28 days after removal (s 33P(3))
Medical retirement
Part IIC: Commissioner of Police with the Minister's approval (s 33ZE(7)). Appeal within 28 days after the retirement day (s 33ZI(4)(a))
Injury scheme
Not a worker under the workers' compensation Act unless the officer dies of the injury (WCIM Regulations r 16(2)). Regulations rr 1304, 1306; Police Agreement cl 38.5, cl 41.1; Part 2D if medically retired; the 2008 Act after leaving
Recruit in training or probationary constableLegal status: Appointed as a member. Probation is 2 years, which the Commissioner of Police may shorten or lengthen (Regulations r 505A(1), (3)). Police cadets are different: they are not members of the Police Force (s 7(2))
System
WA
Instrument
The Police Agreement 2024 (Recruits-in-Training row, cl 10.1)
Discipline route
As for sworn officers: s 23, Police Appeal Board, 14 days
Removal route and time limit
Regulations r 505A(2): the Commissioner of Police's opinion that the member "will not give satisfactory service", with the Minister's approval. Section 33L does not condition it (s 8(4)). On the text there is no s 33P appeal, so no time limit ([2005] WAIRC 01496 at [31]–[32], one Commissioner)
Medical retirement
Part IIC on the text (s 33ZB)
Injury scheme
As for sworn officers
Aboriginal police liaison officerLegal status: Appointed by the Commissioner of Police under Part IIIA (s 38B). Not a member of the Police Force for the purposes of the Act (s 38D(1)). No decision found on the status of the current office. IR Act Sch 3 cl 2(3) names the office; cl 2(2) does not
System
WA
Instrument
The Police Agreement 2024 (cl 5.1)
Discipline route
s 23, then Police Appeal Board within 14 days (s 33E, s 33F(1))
Removal route and time limit
Cancellation after s 33L (s 33K; s 38B(4)). Appeal under s 33P within 28 days after removal
Medical retirement
Part IIC: Commissioner of Police alone (s 33ZE(8)). Appeal within 28 days after the retirement day (s 33ZI)
Injury scheme
Same as sworn officers (WCIM Regulations r 16(2)). Regulations Part XIII (r 104); Part 2D (s 33ZS(1)); the 2008 Act (s 3(1))
Police auxiliary officerLegal status: Appointed by the Commissioner of Police under Part IIIB (s 38G). Not a member of the Police Force for the purposes of the Act (s 38I(1)). A Full Bench reasoned, in a rules decision, that the office "can be said to arise by way of a contract of service" ([2011] WAIRC 00786, heading at [228]–[235]). IR Act Sch 3 cl 2(3) names the office; cl 2(2) does not, and its reach is open
System
WA
Instrument
Police Auxiliary Officers Agreement 2024 (cl 3.1)
Discipline route
s 23, including cancellation (s 23(4)(f)), then Police Appeal Board within 14 days, including from being removed from the office (s 33E; s 33F(1))
Removal route and time limit
Appointment is subject to Part IIB (s 38G(4)): s 33L, then s 33P, within 28 days after removal
Medical retirement
Part IIC: Commissioner of Police alone (s 33ZE(8)). Appeal within 28 days after the retirement day (s 33ZI)
Injury scheme
Rule 16 does not catch you. You are probably a worker under the Workers Compensation and Injury Management Act 2023 (WA) (WCIM Act) s 12(2)(a), but no decision settles it. Not Regulations Part XIII (r 105), not Part 2D (s 33ZS(1)). The 2008 Act, on its words, names police officers and liaison officers only (s 3(1))
Show all 9 rowsShow fewer
Commissioned officer: Inspector, Superintendent, CommanderLegal status: Holds a commission, appointed by the Governor and "subject to the control and discipline of the Commissioner of Police" (s 6). Holds an office, as sworn officers do
System
WA
Instrument
The Police Agreement 2024 for pay and conditions (cl 10.1(g)). Police (Commissioned Officers) Industrial Agreement, No 49 of 1976 (POL001), despite its title, deals only with rank ratios
Discipline route
s 23, examined by an officer of the rank named in s 23(2). Orders for demotion, salary reduction, suspension, discharge or dismissal need the Governor's confirmation (s 23(5)), which waits for the appeal (s 23(6)). Police Appeal Board within 14 days
Removal route and time limit
Removal by the Governor (s 8(1)) after s 33L; the removal action is a recommendation that the Minister advise the Governor (s 33K). Appeal under s 33P within 28 days after removal
Medical retirement
Part IIC: by the Governor (s 33ZE(6)). Appeal within 28 days after the retirement day (s 33ZI)
Injury scheme
As for sworn officers
Above Commander: Assistant and Deputy CommissionerLegal status: Officer ranks (Regulations r 201), appointed by the Governor (s 6). On the text, commissioned officers under s 33K and s 33ZB. Not tested in anything read for this guide
System
WA
Instrument
No agreement: excluded by Police Agreement 2024 cl 5.1 and the Police Award 1965 cl 4. The Salaries and Allowances Tribunal sets their rates
Discipline route
On the text, as for commissioned officers. Not tested
Removal route and time limit
On the text, as for commissioned officers. Not tested
Medical retirement
On the text, by the Governor. Not tested
Injury scheme
On the text, as for sworn officers
Special constableLegal status: Appointed by the Commissioner of Police under Part III (s 35). Not a member of the Police Force for the purposes of the Act (s 37(1))
System
WA
Instrument
None found
Discipline route
Not under s 23. No appeal provided
Removal route and time limit
Cancellation at any time (s 35(4)). IR Act Sch 3 cl 2(3) excludes the Commission. No appeal provided
Medical retirement
Not Part IIC
Injury scheme
Not found. Not this guide
Police staffLegal status: Public service officers under the Public Sector Management Act 1994 (WA) (PSMA), with the Commissioner of Police as chief executive officer (s 4(3)) and employing authority (s 5)
System
WA
Instrument
Western Australia Police Agency Specific Agreement 2016 (WES321) with the Public Sector CSA Agreement 2024 (PUB072). Union: the Civil Service Association, not the WA Police Union. Not this guide
Discipline route
PSMA Part 5. Decisions go to the Commission under PSMA s 78 and IR Act s 29(1)(i), not the Police Appeal Board. Not this guide
Removal route and time limit
Not this guide
Medical retirement
Not Part IIC
Injury scheme
Workers on WCIM Act s 12(2)(a), not excluded by r 16. Not this guide
School traffic warden, on-road assessor or survey officerLegal status: Not a Police Act appointee. Appointed under the Road Traffic Act 1974 (WA) s 7, according to the agreement
System
WA
Instrument
Western Australia Police School Traffic Wardens Agreement 2011 (WES312). Union: the Civil Service Association. Not this guide
Discipline route
Not this guide
Removal route and time limit
Not this guide
Medical retirement
No
Injury scheme
Not this guide

"The 2008 Act" is the Police (Medical and Other Expenses for Former Officers) Act 2008 (WA). The "WCIM Regulations" are the Workers Compensation and Injury Management Regulations 2024 (WA). The Commissioner of Police's own position is not covered.

"Commissioner" means three different people in this area of law, and this page keeps them apart:

  1. the Commissioner of Police;
  2. an industrial Commissioner, who is a member of the WAIRC;
  3. the Commissioner of the Corruption and Crime Commission (Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act 2003 (WA) s 3).

Key time limits

These are short. Missing one can end the right. Most of them run from a date that is easy to misread.

WhatTime limitRuns fromCan it be extended?Source
Appeal to the Police Appeal Board against a disciplinary punishment14 daysThe date the punishment, decision or finding is givenNo extension power appears in Part IIA or the Police Appeal Board RegulationsPolice Act s 33F(1)
Police Appeal Board must start the hearing30 days. If it has not, the punishment, decision or finding "is rescinded" and lost salary or expenses are reimbursedThe date the notice of appeal is lodgedNot a limit on you. If the hearing starts in time, the Board may adjourns 33F(1), (3)
Written submissions after a notice of loss of confidence21 daysThe day the notice is givenYes: "such longer period as is allowed by the Commissioner of Police"s 33L(2)
Request to inspect other material after a notice of loss of confidenceAs soon as practicable, and in any event within 14 daysThe day the notice is givenNo extension is stated in the ruleRegulations r 6A06(2), (3)
Appeal against loss-of-confidence removal28 daysThe day you were removed from office, not the day you were told of the decisionProbably not: work to 28 days. See "The 28 days" belows 33P(3)
Resigning after removal (this bars the appeal, and starting the appeal bars this)Before the end of 28 daysThe day of removalNot stateds 33O(1), (2); s 33P(3)
Written submissions after a notice about medical unfitness28 daysThe day the notice is givenYes: a longer period allowed by the Commissioner of Polices 33ZD(3), (4)
Appeal against medical retirement28 daysThe retirement dayProbably not: the same caution applies, and no decision was founds 33ZI(4)(a)
Dispute to the Police Compensation Tribunal about Part 2D impairment or incapacity compensation28 daysThe notice or, for an early impairment notice, the entitlement dayYes: "The Tribunal may, in a particular case, extend the lodgment period"s 33ZZB(2), (5), (6)
Appeal to the Full Bench from an ordinary decision of a single industrial Commissioner21 daysThe date of the decisionThe Commission may extend a prescribed time (IR Act s 27(1)(n))IR Act s 49(3)
Appeal to the Industrial Appeal Court from a s 33U decision, on limited grounds21 days. A member whose s 33P appeal was dismissed has no such appeal ([2015] WASCA 245 at [15]; [2011] WASCA 168 at [23])The date of the decisionThe court cannot extend it ([2010] WASCA 153 at [14]–[15])IR Act s 90(2), as read by Police Act s 33S
Auxiliary officers only: workers' compensation claim, if the WCIM Act applies, which it probably does12 monthsThe injuryThe Act has its own provisions on late claimsWCIM Act s 25(1)
If a federal claim under Part 6-4 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) is contemplated: the date to diary. This is not a statement that the claim is available. See "What Fair Work does and probably does not reach"21 daysThe alleged terminationOnly in exceptional circumstancesFW Act s 774
Appeal to the Police Appeal Board against a disciplinary punishmentTime limit: 14 days
Runs from
The date the punishment, decision or finding is given
Can it be extended?
No extension power appears in Part IIA or the Police Appeal Board Regulations
Source
Police Act s 33F(1)
Police Appeal Board must start the hearingTime limit: 30 days. If it has not, the punishment, decision or finding "is rescinded" and lost salary or expenses are reimbursed
Runs from
The date the notice of appeal is lodged
Can it be extended?
Not a limit on you. If the hearing starts in time, the Board may adjourn
Source
s 33F(1), (3)
Written submissions after a notice of loss of confidenceTime limit: 21 days
Runs from
The day the notice is given
Can it be extended?
Yes: "such longer period as is allowed by the Commissioner of Police"
Source
s 33L(2)
Request to inspect other material after a notice of loss of confidenceTime limit: As soon as practicable, and in any event within 14 days
Runs from
The day the notice is given
Can it be extended?
No extension is stated in the rule
Source
Regulations r 6A06(2), (3)
Show all 13 rowsShow fewer
Appeal against loss-of-confidence removalTime limit: 28 days
Runs from
The day you were removed from office, not the day you were told of the decision
Can it be extended?
Probably not: work to 28 days. See "The 28 days" below
Source
s 33P(3)
Resigning after removal (this bars the appeal, and starting the appeal bars this)Time limit: Before the end of 28 days
Runs from
The day of removal
Can it be extended?
Not stated
Source
s 33O(1), (2); s 33P(3)
Written submissions after a notice about medical unfitnessTime limit: 28 days
Runs from
The day the notice is given
Can it be extended?
Yes: a longer period allowed by the Commissioner of Police
Source
s 33ZD(3), (4)
Appeal against medical retirementTime limit: 28 days
Runs from
The retirement day
Can it be extended?
Probably not: the same caution applies, and no decision was found
Source
s 33ZI(4)(a)
Dispute to the Police Compensation Tribunal about Part 2D impairment or incapacity compensationTime limit: 28 days
Runs from
The notice or, for an early impairment notice, the entitlement day
Can it be extended?
Yes: "The Tribunal may, in a particular case, extend the lodgment period"
Source
s 33ZZB(2), (5), (6)
Appeal to the Full Bench from an ordinary decision of a single industrial CommissionerTime limit: 21 days
Runs from
The date of the decision
Can it be extended?
The Commission may extend a prescribed time (IR Act s 27(1)(n))
Source
IR Act s 49(3)
Appeal to the Industrial Appeal Court from a s 33U decision, on limited groundsTime limit: 21 days. A member whose s 33P appeal was dismissed has no such appeal ([2015] WASCA 245 at [15]; [2011] WASCA 168 at [23])
Runs from
The date of the decision
Can it be extended?
The court cannot extend it ([2010] WASCA 153 at [14]–[15])
Source
IR Act s 90(2), as read by Police Act s 33S
Auxiliary officers only: workers' compensation claim, if the WCIM Act applies, which it probably doesTime limit: 12 months
Runs from
The injury
Can it be extended?
The Act has its own provisions on late claims
Source
WCIM Act s 25(1)
If a federal claim under Part 6-4 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) is contemplated: the date to diary. This is not a statement that the claim is available. See "What Fair Work does and probably does not reach"Time limit: 21 days
Runs from
The alleged termination
Can it be extended?
Only in exceptional circumstances
Source
FW Act s 774
The 28 days
  1. The rule. A removed officer works to 28 days from removal, not from the notice of decision (s 33P(3)).
  2. Extension. The 28 days under s 33P(3) probably cannot be extended, and no decision settles it. One member of a three-member bench has said the limit cannot be extended and the other two did not need to decide ([2009] WAIRC 00514 at [21], [28], [32], [38]), and a later bench leaned the same way without deciding it ([2012] WAIRC 00112 at [16], [19]). The argument the other way is that the s 33S Table applies IR Act s 27(1)(n) to these appeals.
  3. Medical retirement. The same caution applies to s 33ZI(4)(a), on which no decision was found.
  4. Lodging. Three copies of the notice of appeal in the approved form are filed in the office of the Registrar, who then serves the Commissioner of Police (Industrial Relations Commission Regulations 2005 (WA) rr 90, 91A). Under those Regulations:
    1. a document is received on a particular day "if it is lodged electronically at any time on that day up to and including midnight" (r 6(3));
    2. a document lodged electronically on a Saturday, Sunday or public holiday is taken to be received on "the next day when the office of the Registrar opens to the public for the transaction of business" (r 6(3A));
    3. a document sent by email must comply with r 5(2) (r 5(2), (6));
    4. other lodgment stays within opening hours (r 4(2)).
  5. In practice. Working to a date before the 28th day avoids these questions, particularly where the 28th day falls near a weekend or public holiday.

The short version

Your status

At common law a sworn officer holds an office. The WA Court of Appeal: "absent a statutory provision to the contrary, members of a police force are not employed under a contract of employment; they are, instead, independent office holders exercising original authority in the execution of their duties" (Falconer v Commissioner of Police [No 2] [2024] WASCA 47 at [44]). The High Court has said the same of NSW officers (Cottle [2022] HCA 7 at [9]). The root authority is Enever v The King [1906] HCA 3.

WA statutes then change that for particular purposes, one Act at a time:

  1. the IR Act applies "as if" the officer were a government officer and the Commissioner of Police the employer (Sch 3 cl 2(2));
  2. the Minimum Conditions of Employment Act 1993 (WA) applies "as if" the officer were an employee (s 6A);
  3. the Equal Opportunity Act 1984 (WA) includes a member of the Police Force as a State employee (s 4(1)), with the Commissioner of Police as employer (s 163(2));
  4. the Work Health and Safety Act 2020 (WA) (WHS Act) makes a police officer "a worker of WA Police" while on duty (s 7(2)).

Being deemed for one Act does not carry to another. The agreements' words "Employee" and "Employer" (Police Agreement cl 6.16, 6.17) are the instrument's words, and do not settle status.

Your agreement and pay

The Police Agreement has three dated rises, on 1 July 2024, 2025 and 2026, at 5%, 4% and 3.75% (the last computed from the table, cl 10.1). The Police Auxiliary Officers Agreement has its own: 2 November 2024, 2025 and 2026 at 5%, 4% and 3.5% (cl 14.1). Each date in those lists has now passed, and neither agreement prints a later rise.

Rank or bandAnnual rateFrom
Recruit-in-Training$74,3091 July 2026
Constable, 1st and 2nd year$94,6511 July 2026
First Class Constable, base rate$107,9771 July 2026
Sergeant, base rate$127,6191 July 2026
Inspector, base rate$173,3611 July 2026
Police auxiliary officer, AP1.1$81,7542 November 2026
Police auxiliary officer, AP3.5$108,7002 November 2026
Recruit-in-TrainingAnnual rate: $74,309
From
1 July 2026
Constable, 1st and 2nd yearAnnual rate: $94,651
From
1 July 2026
First Class Constable, base rateAnnual rate: $107,977
From
1 July 2026
Sergeant, base rateAnnual rate: $127,619
From
1 July 2026
Show all 7 rowsShow fewer
Inspector, base rateAnnual rate: $173,361
From
1 July 2026
Police auxiliary officer, AP1.1Annual rate: $81,754
From
2 November 2026
Police auxiliary officer, AP3.5Annual rate: $108,700
From
2 November 2026

Every other rate, allowances, hours, leave and rest days are on Your agreements and pay.

Discipline

A member who breaches the Regulations "commits an offence against the discipline of the Force" (r 1601). After an examination under s 23 the Commissioner of Police or appointed officer may caution, or by written order impose one or more punishments, from a reprimand through a fine of up to 3% of annual base pay, demotion, salary reduction and suspension to discharge, dismissal or cancellation of appointment (s 23(4)). An appeal lies to the Police Appeal Board for the punishments listed in s 33E. A reprimand or caution is not listed, and salary reduction is not listed in terms.

The Board is a magistrate as Chairman, a person appointed by the Commissioner of Police and an elected member of the Force (s 33B(2)). Its decision "is final" (s 33H(1A)), and it must award costs against an appellant whose appeal it considers trivial, frivolous or vexatious (s 33H(1B)).

The WAIRC stays out. It must not regulate discipline where another Act provides for it and for an appeal (IR Act s 23(3)(d)). It has applied that to orders about threatened discipline, even though no process had begun, and has held that Sch 3 cl 2(3) does not lead to police being treated differently ([2026] WAIRC 00789 at [49], [53]). The Police Agreement has no discipline clause, and nothing should be inferred from that silence. The detail is on Discipline, removal and appeals.

Loss-of-confidence removal

This is neither discipline nor unfair dismissal. The steps:

  1. a written notice giving the grounds and the particular conduct (s 33L(1); Regulations r 6A05(1));
  2. your written submissions, within 21 days or any longer period allowed (s 33L(2));
  3. the decision, with notice and reasons within 7 days of the decision to take removal action (s 33L(3), (5)(a); Regulations r 6A09(1));
  4. copies of the documents relied on, within 7 days of that notice, except as the Regulations provide (s 33L(5)(b); r 6A09(2));
  5. removal action, when or at any time after that notice (s 33L(5)(c)).

Pay must not be suspended while your suitability is being considered (r 6A12). After removal there is a maintenance payment for 28 days, and up to 6 months more only if the Minister so directs in exceptional circumstances (s 33M). A charge, proceedings or an acquittal does not preclude action under Part IIB (s 33W).

On appeal the ground is that the decision "was harsh, oppressive or unfair" (s 33P(1)). The burden is on the appellant at all times (s 33Q(2), (3)), and the Commission must have regard to the public interest as well as the appellant's interests (s 33Q(4)). No costs are ordered for the services of a legal practitioner or agent, on IR Act s 27(1)(c) as applied by the s 33S Table.

Recruits and probationers

The Commissioner of Police may, with the Minister's approval, remove a member on probation on the opinion that the member "will not give satisfactory service" (Regulations r 505A(2)). Section 33L does not condition that power (s 8(4)), and s 33P is open only to a member removed under s 33L. So on the text there is no appeal, and the IR Act route is closed by Sch 3 cl 2(3). One Commissioner said the same in 2005 ([2005] WAIRC 01496 at [30]–[32]). Probation under the Police Auxiliary Officers Agreement for auxiliary officers is nine months (cl 13.1), and is a different thing.

Injury while serving

Sworn officers and liaison officers are not workers under the WCIM Act: "An individual appointed as a police officer or an Aboriginal police liaison officer is not a worker unless the police officer or Aboriginal police liaison officer dies as a result of an injury" (WCIM Regulations r 16(2)). There is no weekly payment scheme and no lump sum while serving. Instead:

  1. paid leave is a discretion: the Commissioner of Police "may grant" leave with pay for up to 168 days in a calendar year, and a further period if recommended (Regulations r 1304(1); Police Agreement cl 38.5);
  2. work-related medical and hospital expenses are a duty: the Commissioner of Police "shall pay" the reasonable expenses (r 1306; Police Agreement cl 41.1);
  3. neither applies to illness or injury through your own "fault or misconduct" (r 1308; Police Agreement cl 38.8).

Auxiliary officers are on the other side of the line. Rule 16 does not catch them, and they are probably workers under WCIM Act s 12(2)(a). No decision settles it. In short:

  1. the rule names the liaison officer separately and leaves the auxiliary officer out, and a 2009 amendment redrew the exclusion so that workers' compensation would apply to auxiliary officers;
  2. the remaining step, whether a s 38G appointment is a contract of service, rests on reasoning in a rules decision about another Act ([2011] WAIRC 00786 at [228]–[235]);
  3. The Police Auxiliary Officers Agreement itself refers to the WCIM Act (cl 36.17).
Medical retirement and compensation

Since 30 November 2019, "members who are medically unfit can be retired specifically on medical grounds (rather than being removed under Part IIB)" (Police Act s 33ZA). Part IIC applies to sworn, liaison and auxiliary officers (s 33ZB). It starts with a medical board (s 33ZC), then a notice and 28 days or longer for submissions (s 33ZD(3), (4)), then a decision with reasons (s 33ZE).

Lump-sum compensation under Part 2D is narrower:

  1. it is only for a medically retired sworn or liaison officer, retired on or after 1 January 2022, with a compensable medical condition, whose appeal did not end in reinstatement (s 33ZU(1));
  2. an auxiliary officer is outside it (s 33ZS(1)), and so is a serving officer or one who was removed or resigned;
  3. resigning under s 33ZH cancels it (s 33ZU(2));
  4. permanent impairment compensation requires a personal injury by accident (s 33ZW(3)(c)), so as the Act stands a psychological injury that is a disease cannot found that one payment, though it may still bring the others.

After leaving, the 2008 Act makes the Commissioner of Police liable for medical and other expenses from an injury, for former police officers and liaison officers, whether or not they were medically retired (s 3(1), s 4(1)). The detail is on Injury, medical retirement and compensation.

The Police Amendment (Compensation Scheme) Bill 2025 would change Part 2D. As at 7 November 2026 it is at second reading in the Legislative Council. It is not law, and there is no post-traumatic stress disorder presumption in force.

Disputes, bargaining and safety
  1. Ordinary industrial matters go to the WAIRC. An industrial matter relating to a government officer is within the general jurisdiction (IR Act s 36AA(2)(a)), the union may refer a matter (s 29(1)(a)(ii)), and the Police Agreement's dispute clause ends with a referral by either party (cl 8.3 to 8.6).
  2. Bullying and sexual harassment. The WAIRC route applies, because "A police officer is" a worker of WA Police for that purpose (IR Act s 51BH(2)).
  3. Discrimination. The Equal Opportunity Act covers members of the Police Force as State employees (s 4(1), s 163(2)).
  4. Safety. The WHS Act applies while on duty (s 7(2)), with targeted limits for covert and dangerous operations (ss 84(2), 85(7)).
  5. Bargaining is under the IR Act. How it works, the wages policy, the regulations that bear on industrial action and the next round are on Bargaining, and what is happening now.

What Fair Work does and probably does not reach

WA has not referred its industrial relations powers to the Commonwealth ([2017] FWC 5022 at [9], on another WA State body), and neither the State nor the Commissioner of Police is on the list of national system employers (Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) s 14(1)). The answer differs by Part.

Read moreShow less
Part of the FW ActThe position for a sworn WA officerWhy
Unfair dismissal (Part 3-2), bargaining, modern awards, the National Employment Standards as such, and protected actionDo not reachThey need a national system employer (s 380 for unfair dismissal). No decision on a WA officer's application was found. Decisions on other WA State bodies show the Commission's working treatment ([2017] FWC 5022; [2017] FWC 5079; [2020] FWC 2402)
General protections (Part 3-1)On the text, action by the Commissioner of Police is outside s 338(1)(a), subject to edge cases in s 338(1)(b) to (d)The Part applies only as ss 337 to 339 provide, and the State and the Commissioner of Police are not a constitutionally-covered entity. No WA decision was found
Stop bullying (Part 6-4B)Closed for the Commissioner of Police or the State (s 789FD(3))The WA route is IR Act s 51BH(2), above
Unlawful termination (Part 6-4)Probably does not reach a sworn WA officer. No decision settles itSection 770 gives "employee" its "ordinary meanings", which the Full Federal Court has said is the common law meaning, in remarks about s 772 made in an Air Force case (C v Commonwealth [2015] FCAFC 113 at [34]–[36], [65]). A police officer holds an office at common law (Falconer at [44]). An older decision on earlier words went the other way (Konrad v Victoria Police [1999] FCA 988 at [13])
Extended parental leave, family and domestic violence leave, and notice (Part 6-3: ss 744, 757B, 759)Probably does not reach a sworn WA officer. No decision settles it, and no decision on s 742 was foundSection 742 uses the same words as s 770, so the reasoning in C carries over, but only by analogy
Federal agreements and awardsNone covers a WA sworn officerThe Victoria Police agreement exists because Victoria referred its powers. WA did not
Unfair dismissal (Part 3-2), bargaining, modern awards, the National Employment Standards as such, and protected actionThe position for a sworn WA officer: Do not reach
Why
They need a national system employer (s 380 for unfair dismissal). No decision on a WA officer's application was found. Decisions on other WA State bodies show the Commission's working treatment ([2017] FWC 5022; [2017] FWC 5079; [2020] FWC 2402)
General protections (Part 3-1)The position for a sworn WA officer: On the text, action by the Commissioner of Police is outside s 338(1)(a), subject to edge cases in s 338(1)(b) to (d)
Why
The Part applies only as ss 337 to 339 provide, and the State and the Commissioner of Police are not a constitutionally-covered entity. No WA decision was found
Stop bullying (Part 6-4B)The position for a sworn WA officer: Closed for the Commissioner of Police or the State (s 789FD(3))
Why
The WA route is IR Act s 51BH(2), above
Unlawful termination (Part 6-4)The position for a sworn WA officer: Probably does not reach a sworn WA officer. No decision settles it
Why
Section 770 gives "employee" its "ordinary meanings", which the Full Federal Court has said is the common law meaning, in remarks about s 772 made in an Air Force case (C v Commonwealth [2015] FCAFC 113 at [34]–[36], [65]). A police officer holds an office at common law (Falconer at [44]). An older decision on earlier words went the other way (Konrad v Victoria Police [1999] FCA 988 at [13])
Show all 6 rowsShow fewer
Extended parental leave, family and domestic violence leave, and notice (Part 6-3: ss 744, 757B, 759)The position for a sworn WA officer: Probably does not reach a sworn WA officer. No decision settles it, and no decision on s 742 was found
Why
Section 742 uses the same words as s 770, so the reasoning in C carries over, but only by analogy
Federal agreements and awardsThe position for a sworn WA officer: None covers a WA sworn officer
Why
The Victoria Police agreement exists because Victoria referred its powers. WA did not

Three cautions:

  1. Northern Territory and Victorian decisions turn on their own facts. Vale [2022] FWC 2101 at [79] (appeal dismissed, [2023] FWCFB 41) concerns Part 3-2 in a Territory, and decides nothing about WA.
  2. Common law status does not answer every federal Act. A NSW officer was held to be an employee for the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth), on that Act's own terms, while the Court accepted the common law position (Ryan [2022] FCAFC 36 at [90], [116]–[117]).
  3. Liaison and auxiliary officers. The two "probably" statements above are about sworn officers. Their appointments are made differently, and the contract question may come out differently for them. This guide states no answer.

None of this should be read as saying that a federal remedy exists. If a federal claim is contemplated alongside a removal, the 21 days in s 774 is the date to diary, because it is shorter than the 28 days, and diarying it says nothing about whether the claim is available. How such a claim would sit with a s 33P appeal is not covered here.

What is happening now

From the public record only, as at 7 November 2026. No view on any outcome, and no prediction.
The union and the Commissioner of PoliceThe next agreementsThe Police Agreement's last dated rise was on 1 July 2026 and the Police Auxiliary Officers Agreement's on 2 November 2026. Neither agreement prints another. No log of claims or public statement on replacing either agreement was found when the record was searched on 6 November 2026. That is a gap in what was searched and read, not evidence that nothing is happening. Dates marked "computed" were worked out from the clause cited.
  1. About 30 December 2026 (computed) The Police Agreement 2024: the parties "shall commence negotiations for a new industrial agreement 6 months prior to expiry". Police Agreement 2024 cl 4.3
  2. By about 1 May 2027 (computed) The Police Auxiliary Officers Agreement 2024: the parties "shall commence negotiations" at least 6 months before expiry. Police Auxiliary Officers Agreement 2024 cl 5.2
  3. 30 June 2027 The Police Agreement's term ends. It then continues until a party withdraws. Police Agreement 2024 cl 4.1, 4.4
  4. 1 November 2027 The Police Auxiliary Officers Agreement's stated end date. It then continues until a replacement is registered. Police Auxiliary Officers Agreement 2024 cl 5.1
Parliament of Western AustraliaThe Police Amendment (Compensation Scheme) Bill 2025 (Bill 41): not lawAs at 7 November 2026, Parliament's page shows its status as "Legislative Council Second Reading". It would create a rebuttable presumption that a medical retiree's post-traumatic stress disorder is related to their work as a member. It is not law, and no such presumption is in force.
  1. 20 November 2025 Third reading in the Legislative Assembly. Bill 41, Parliament's progress page
  2. 2 December 2025 Second reading moved in the Legislative Council. Bill 41, Parliament's progress page
  3. 21 October 2026 Amendments on notice in a Supplementary Notice Paper. Bill 41, Parliament's progress page
Parliament of Western AustraliaThe Equal Opportunity Bill 2026 (Bill 90): not lawIt would repeal the Equal Opportunity Act 1984 (WA), and employment would include "work by a police officer", with the Commissioner of Police as employer. The law in force today is the 1984 Act.
  1. 21 October 2026 Introduced. As at 7 November 2026, Parliament's page shows its status as "Legislative Assembly Second Reading". Bill 90, Parliament's progress page

How bargaining works for police, and the full public record: Bargaining, and what is happening now

Annual rates for WA police

The Police Agreement has three dated rises, on 1 July 2024, 2025 and 2026, at 5%, 4% and 3.75% (the last computed from the table, cl 10.1). The Police Auxiliary Officers Agreement has its own: 2 November 2024, 2025 and 2026 at 5%, 4% and 3.5% (cl 14.1). Each date in those lists has now passed, and neither agreement prints a later rise.

Your agreements and pay →A police auxiliary officer stands at a long reception counter inside a police station, writing on a clipboard, with a member of the public waiting on a bench in the distance
Recruit-in-Training$74,309 from 1 July 2026
Constable, 1st and 2nd year$94,651 from 1 July 2026
First Class Constable, base rate$107,977 from 1 July 2026
Sergeant, base rate$127,619 from 1 July 2026
Inspector, base rate$173,361 from 1 July 2026
Police auxiliary officer, AP1.1$81,754 from 2 November 2026
Police auxiliary officer, AP3.5$108,700 from 2 November 2026
Decided cases

What the Commission and the courts decided.

Published decisions, retold in plain English from the decision itself. Each links to the full text. Lawcaptain did not act in these cases.

Appeal dismissed: the Crown was not liable for the arrest under the Tasmanian ActHigh Court of Australia · 12 March 1906

Decided in 1906: the constable's authority is original, not delegated

A man arrested in Tasmania tried to hold the Crown liable for the constable's act. The High Court's reasons became the root of the rule that a constable holds an office.

Read the full storyShow less

The question was whether the Crown was liable, under a Tasmanian Act allowing claims against it, for a wrongful arrest by a constable. Griffith CJ described the office: "At common law the office of constable or peace officer was regarded as a public office, and the holder of it as being, in some sense, a servant of the Crown." A constable acting as a peace officer exercises "an original authority", and "the general law of agency has no application".

It is a tort and Crown liability case. It did not decide an employment statute.

In the decision's words: "A constable, therefore, when acting as a peace officer, is not exercising a delegated authority, but an original authority, and the general law of agency has no application." (Griffith CJ)

What it means for you

This is where the line starts. WA's Court of Appeal still relies on it. It explains why a sworn officer holds an office, with statutes then changing the result for particular purposes.

Appeal dismissed: the action for loss of a servant's services does not extend to a constablePrivy Council (Viscount Simonds for the Board) · 1955

Decided in 1955: a public office is different from the relation of servant and master

A NSW constable was injured, and the Crown sued for the loss of his services. The Privy Council held the old action did not reach a constable, because his relationship with the State is not that of servant and master.

Read the full storyShow less

The Crown sought to sue a wrongdoer for loss of the services of an injured NSW constable. The Privy Council dismissed the appeal. It said a constable's office had not changed its fundamental character, and that his authority "is original not delegated and is exercised at his own discretion by virtue of his office".

The limit matters: the Board's concern was whether an old form of action should be extended. It was not construing an industrial statute.

In the decision's words: "...there is a fundamental difference between the domestic relation of servant and master and that of the holder of a public office and the State which he is said to serve." (at p 129)

What it means for you

This passage is quoted in the modern cases, including Ryan at [90]. When the question is the common law, this is the answer. When the question is a statute, the words of that statute come first.

Appeals allowed and remitted: Victorian officers were employees for the purposes of that federal DivisionFull Court of the Federal Court (Ryan, North and Finkelstein JJ) · 6 August 1999

Decided in 1999: Konrad, and "employee" under the old federal termination law

Victorian officers brought claims under the federal termination law of the 1990s. The Full Court held the question was what the statute meant, not what the common law says. The current Act uses different words.

Read the full storyShow less

The trial judge had held the officers were not employees. On appeal, Ryan J framed the question: it "is not whether police officers are employees of the Crown or the State" at common law, but "whether police officers are employees in the sense contemplated by Division 3" ([13]). The Division took its meanings from the Termination of Employment Convention, through s 170CB of the Industrial Relations Act 1988 (Cth) ([3], [14]; Finkelstein J at [71], [102]).

The Court held the officers were employees for that Division.

In the decision's words: "Rather, it is whether police officers are employees in the sense contemplated by Division 3 of Part VIA of the Act." (Ryan J at [13])

What it means for you

Do not read Konrad as saying a WA officer has a Fair Work remedy today. The current Act has no equivalent of s 170CB, and s 770 says "ordinary meanings". See the next entry. Its lasting point is method: read the statute in issue.

Judgment for the CommonwealthFull Court of the Federal Court (Tracey, Buchanan and Katzmann JJ) · 21 August 2015

Decided in 2015: C v Commonwealth, "ordinary meanings" and the current words

An Air Force member discharged on medical grounds brought an adverse action claim. The Full Court held that "employee" in that Part carries its common law meaning, and said why the same reading applies to Part 6-4.

Read the full storyShow less

An Air Force member brought a claim under the Fair Work Act. The Court held that the "ordinary meanings" of employee and employer "are rooted in the common law", and that this narrower wording is significant given Konrad ([34]). It said that narrow definition "may not extend to some or all police officers", pointing to s 30E(1), which extends the meaning to law enforcement officers only in a referring State ([34]–[35]).

The applicant abandoned a foreshadowed amendment to claim under Part 6-4, and the Court said he was correct to do so ([61]). What it had said about s 335 "applies with equal force to the meaning and application of s 772" ([65]).

It is a Defence Force case, and it transfers to a WA constable only in part. Its words on police are hedged, and its remarks on Part 6-4 answered an amendment that was abandoned.

In the decision's words: "...it is clear, in the context of the FW Act, that \"the ordinary meaning\" is that comprehended by the common law." ([36])

What it means for you

This is the main reason Part 6-4 probably does not reach a sworn WA officer. No decision applies it to one, so no decision settles the point. See Discipline, removal and appeals.

Appeals dismissedWA Court of Appeal (Buss P, Vaughan and Hall JJA) · 30 April 2024

Decided in 2024: the current WA appellate statement on status

In an administrative law appeal, the WA Court of Appeal stated the general rule: absent a statute to the contrary, members of a police force are office holders, not employees under a contract.

Read the full storyShow less

The appeals concerned a direction by the Commissioner of Police to WA officers. The Court said that "for present purposes it suffices" to state the rule ([44]), citing the line from Perpetual Trustee and Enever through to Ryan at [90] and Cottle at [9].

It is an administrative law decision, and not a decision on the Fair Work Act. It states a general rule and does not test Police Act ss 10 and 11 on the contract question.

In the decision's words: "...absent a statutory provision to the contrary, members of a police force are not employed under a contract of employment; they are, instead, independent office holders exercising original authority in the execution of their duties." ([44])

What it means for you

This is the statement to start from in WA. The IR Act and Minimum Conditions of Employment Act are statutes "to the contrary" for their purposes, and each other statute has to be read on its own terms.

Show more case studies (3)(3)Show fewer

Your union

The WA Police Union (the Western Australian Police Union of Workers) is a named party to both agreements (Police Agreement cl 1.3; Police Auxiliary Officers Agreement cl 1.3). The Civil Service Association of Western Australia is also a named party to the Police Auxiliary Officers Agreement, and is the union for police staff and for school traffic wardens and others under the School Traffic Wardens Agreement 2011.

If you are facing a charge, a notice of loss of confidence or a medical board, talk to your union or a lawyer before you act.

Need a lawyer?

We act for people in the Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission and the Industrial Magistrates Court.

Questions

The things people ask.

Am I an employee?

A sworn officer holds an office and is not an employee at common law (Falconer at [44]). The IR Act and the Minimum Conditions of Employment Act apply as if you were, other statutes must each be read separately, and the agreement's use of "Employee" does not settle it. Auxiliary officers are in a different position, because a Full Bench has reasoned that their office can be said to arise by way of a contract of service ([2011] WAIRC 00786 at [228]–[235]).

I have been told the Commissioner of Police has lost confidence in me. Is that discipline?

No. A notice under s 33L is the start of the Part IIB process, which is separate from a charge under s 23. It has its own test, its own 21 days for written submissions and its own appeal, to the WAIRC and not the Police Appeal Board.

When does the 28 days start?

From the day you were removed from office, not the day you received the notice of decision (s 33P(3)). Those can be different days, because removal action can come when or at any time after the notice (s 33L(5)(c)). Whether the 28 days can be extended: probably not, and no decision settles it.

Can I appeal if I lose before the WAIRC on a removal?

A member whose appeal is dismissed has no further right of appeal under IR Act s 90 as read by Police Act s 33S, because that right is confined to a decision under s 33U ([2015] WASCA 245 at [15]; [2011] WASCA 168 at [23]). The Commissioner of Police can appeal a decision against the Commissioner of Police on the limited s 90 grounds ([2019] WASCA 14). Whether judicial review is available was left open in [2006] WASC 189 at [35]–[36].

Can I appeal a Police Appeal Board decision?

"[T]he decision of the Board is final" (s 33H(1A)).

What happens if the Police Appeal Board does not hear my appeal within 30 days?

If the hearing has not commenced within 30 days of the notice being lodged, the punishment, decision or finding "is rescinded", and you are reimbursed any lost salary or expenses (s 33F(1), (3)). If the hearing commences in time, the Board may adjourn.

I am on probation. What can I do if I am removed?

On the text, a probationer removed under r 505A(2) has no s 33L process and no s 33P appeal, and the IR Act route is closed (s 8(4); IR Act Sch 3 cl 2(3)). A disciplinary punishment is different: the s 23 route and the 14 days apply to you as to other members.

I am an auxiliary officer and was injured at work. What applies?

Rule 16 does not catch you, and you are probably a worker under WCIM Act s 12(2)(a). No decision settles it. The open step is whether a s 38G appointment is a contract of service. The Police Auxiliary Officers Agreement refers to that Act (cl 36.17). Regulations Part XIII and Part 2D do not apply to you. Part IIC does apply if medical retirement is in issue.

Does the workers' compensation Act cover a sworn officer who dies of an injury?

Yes. A police officer or liaison officer who dies as a result of an injury is a worker, and the Commissioner of Police is the employer (WCIM Regulations r 16(2), (3)).

Does the union have to fund my representation?

No. The union's registered rules allow the Board to grant financial or legal assistance, but "Members shall not have a right to be granted financial and/or legal assistance" and a grant is at its sole discretion (r 11.6(c), consolidated to 6 March 2024). The Police Act, the Regulations and the Police Agreement contain no provision for funding an officer's representation.

Can I go to the Fair Work Commission?

Not for unfair dismissal. Whether Part 6-4 or Part 6-3 reaches a sworn WA officer is not settled by any decision, and they probably do not. See "What Fair Work does and probably does not reach" above.

Is post-traumatic stress disorder presumed to be work-related?

Not as the law stands. The Police Amendment (Compensation Scheme) Bill 2025 would create a rebuttable presumption for a medical retiree, but it is not law.

For unions and industrial officers

The same research agent can work through your members' agreement, its history in the Commission, and the decisions on it.

We use our software to generate this content with AI assistance. General information about the law, not legal advice. It takes no side in any current proceeding, and makes no prediction about any Bill. Last checked 7 November 2026.