HomeWA firefightersDiscipline and dismissal
Fire Brigades Regulations 1943 (WA) · Part VI Division 3

Disciplined or dismissed by DFES? The 7-day appeal is the main event.

For DFES career firefighters, discipline is a self-contained code with its own appeal. Because that appeal exists, the WAIRC very likely cannot hear an unfair dismissal claim about it.

7 daysto appeal a finding or decision
7 working daysto reply in writing to a charge
28 dayswithin which the appeal must be set down for decision
A firefighter at his kitchen table reads a letter, worried

Time limit 7 days after you receive notice of a disciplinary finding or decision to appeal it (r 137F(3), r 137G(3)), and 7 working days to reply to a charge (r 137A(1)).

Key time limits

StepTime limitSource
Reply to a disciplinary charge7 working days after you receive the chargeFire Brigades Regulations r 137A(1)
Appeal a delegate's finding or decision to the FES Commissioner7 days after you receive notice of itr 137F(3)
Appeal the FES Commissioner's finding or decision to the Appeal Board7 days after you receive notice of itr 137G(3)
WA unfair dismissal claim (where it is available)28 days after the employment endsIR Act s 29(2)(a)
Damaging action claim6 yearsIR Act s 82A
Equal opportunity complaint12 months, or later on good causeEqual Opportunity Act 1984 s 83(4)–(5)
Fair Work unfair dismissal or general protections dismissal claim (Ventia, Airservices)21 days after the dismissal takes effectFW Act s 394(2)(a), s 366(1)(a)
Reply to a disciplinary chargeTime limit: 7 working days after you receive the charge
Appeal a delegate's finding or decision to the FES CommissionerTime limit: 7 days after you receive notice of it
Source
r 137F(3)
Appeal the FES Commissioner's finding or decision to the Appeal BoardTime limit: 7 days after you receive notice of it
Source
r 137G(3)
WA unfair dismissal claim (where it is available)Time limit: 28 days after the employment ends
Show all 7 rowsShow fewer
Damaging action claimTime limit: 6 years
Equal opportunity complaintTime limit: 12 months, or later on good cause
Fair Work unfair dismissal or general protections dismissal claim (Ventia, Airservices)Time limit: 21 days after the dismissal takes effect

The 7-day appeal window is the one members most often miss. If the last day falls on a Sunday or a public holiday, the period runs to the next day (r 2A); a Saturday is not excluded. The chairperson of the Appeal Board can enlarge time (r 140), but do not rely on it.

The short version

If you are a DFES career firefighter, discipline is not run under the general public sector rules and it is not something the Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission (WAIRC) can supervise. It is a self-contained code in Part VI Division 3 of the Fire Brigades Regulations, with its own appeal to a three-member Appeal Board. Because that code exists and includes an appeal, the IR Act stops the Commission from regulating discipline or a disciplinary dismissal (s 23(3)(d)).

That makes the regulations, and the 7-day appeal deadline, the main event. Other routes still exist for some situations: damaging action, discrimination, enforcing the agreement, bullying and sexual harassment, and workers' compensation. They are set out below, with a table of options at the end.

Who the regulations apply to

The Fire and Emergency Services Act 1998 (WA) (FES Act) employs people in DFES in three classes: public service officers, operational staff and wages staff (s 20(1)). Members and officers of a permanent fire brigade are operational staff (s 20(2)(a)).

Read moreShow less

For operational staff:

(a) the public sector employment rules in Part 3 of the Public Sector Management Act 1994 (WA) do not apply (FES Act s 21(1));

(b) the powers "to engage, transfer, promote and otherwise manage" them belong to the FES Commissioner (s 21(2));

(c) their pay and conditions must not be less favourable than the applicable award or industrial agreement, or the Minimum Conditions of Employment Act 1993 (WA) (s 21(3));

(d) they may be engaged permanently or "for a period not exceeding 5 years" (s 21(4)(b)).

The disciplinary code applies to an "employee", which the regulations define as a member of the operational staff (r 96). Every approved candidate must also undergo a medical examination by the Department's medical officer as to suitability before appointment (r 97).

If you work in DFES as a public service officer rather than as operational staff, a different discipline regime applies (Public Sector Management Act 1994 Part 5), with a referral to the WAIRC within 28 days of the decision (IR Act s 29(1)(i), s 29(2)(c)). See our page on the WA public sector.

The disciplinary process, step by step

All references are to the Fire Brigades Regulations 1943 (consolidation as at 1 July 2024).

1What counts as a breach of disciplineThe Regulations list seven kinds of conduct that are a breach of discipline. They include negligence, incompetence within your control, being impaired on duty and disobeying a lawful order. The widest is "disgraceful or improper conduct", which can reach what you do off duty, including online.r 134

An employee commits a breach of discipline if the employee (r 134):

(a) breaches the Fire Brigades Act 1942 (WA) or its regulations;

(b) is negligent or careless in the discharge of duties;

(c) is inefficient or incompetent through causes that appear to be within the employee's own control;

(d) is on duty while under the influence of or impaired by alcohol, a targeted drug or both, or, while on duty, consumes, uses or possesses them (r 134(d), (da)); "targeted drug" covers drugs under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1981 (WA) and Schedule 2, 3 and 4 poisons (r 96), and any other drug or substance the FES Commissioner declares by notice in the Gazette (r 135);

(e) is guilty of "disgraceful or improper conduct either in his official capacity or otherwise";

(f) wilfully disobeys or disregards a lawful order or instruction; or

(g) wilfully supplies the FES Commissioner with incorrect or misleading information in connection with being employed in the Department.

Paragraph (e) reaches conduct off duty, including what you post online. The published case below began with a letter about a social media comment.

Separately, r 133 lists conduct rules for officers and members, such as not communicating with the media without authority (r 133(c)) and not acting in a way that imperils the discipline, good order or reputation of the brigade (r 133(i)). Breaching a regulation is itself a breach of discipline under r 134(a).

2The FES Commissioner's first decisionWhen the FES Commissioner learns of a possible breach, there are four choices: lay a charge, suspend you, take improvement action such as counselling, or do nothing. The Commissioner can investigate first. You are entitled to a union advocate during that investigation.r 136

When the FES Commissioner becomes aware that an employee may have committed a breach of discipline, the Commissioner must decide to do one or more of the following, or to take no action (r 136(1)):

(a) make a disciplinary charge;

(b) suspend the employee on full pay, partial pay or without pay;

(c) take improvement action.

"Improvement action" means counselling, training and development, a warning that certain conduct is unacceptable, or similar action (r 96). The Commissioner may investigate first (r 136(4)). During that investigation you are entitled to be represented by an advocate from your union, or by a person the FES Commissioner approves if you are not a member (r 136(5)).

A charge must be recorded in writing (r 136(2)(a)). A decision to suspend or to take improvement action must be given to you in writing (r 136(3)).

3SuspensionYou can be suspended only if the alleged breach means you should not keep doing your job. The suspension can be on full pay, part pay or no pay. If no charge is made, the charge is withdrawn or you are cleared, it must be lifted and any pay withheld is restored.r 137

The FES Commissioner may suspend you only if the alleged breach "is of such a nature that the employee should not continue in the performance of the employee's duty" (r 137(1)). The suspension can be lifted or varied at any time (r 137(2)). It must be lifted if no charge is made, the charge is withdrawn, or you are found not to have committed a breach (r 137(3)).

Pay withheld during a suspension is restored if the suspension is removed for one of those reasons (r 137(5)), and forfeited if a breach is found (r 137(4)).

4The charge, and your 7 working daysYou must be given the charge in writing and told to reply within 7 working days. Your reply says whether you admit or deny it, signed by you or your representative. If you do not reply in time, you are taken to deny the charge.r 137A

You must be given a copy of the charge and a written notice to reply in writing within 7 working days after you receive it (r 137A(1)). The reply must say whether you admit or deny the charge and be signed by you or your representative (r 137A(2)). If you do not reply in time, you are taken to deny the charge (r 137A(3)).

The FES Commissioner may withdraw a charge at any time by written notice (r 137B). Notices under the code must be given to you, or to the person acting for you, personally or by registered post (r 142A).

5The inquiryThe Commissioner must hold an inquiry as soon as practicable. You get at least 7 days’ written notice and copies of every document to be used. A union advocate can represent you, and you can ask for the record of the proceedings.r 137C, r 139

The FES Commissioner must hold an inquiry into the charge as soon as practicable (r 137C(1)), and must give you:

(a) written notice of the time and place at least 7 days before it starts (r 137C(2)(a)); and

(b) copies of all documents intended to be used at it (r 137C(2)(b)).

If you were properly notified and do not attend, it can go ahead without you (r 137C(3)). At the inquiry you may be represented by a union advocate (r 139(1)(a)) and must, if the presiding authority directs, give evidence on oath and be cross-examined (r 139(1)(b)). The proceedings are recorded, and you can ask in writing for a copy, which must be given within 4 days of the end of the proceedings (r 139(2)). The presiding authority decides whether it is heard in public or private (r 139(3)).

At the end the FES Commissioner must find that you did or did not commit a breach of discipline, and tell you in writing (r 137C(4)–(5)).

6If the charge is not proved: your costsIf the inquiry finds you did not commit a breach, DFES must pay the reasonable expenses you incurred defending the charge. The FES Commissioner fixes the amount. Any suspension must also be lifted and withheld pay restored.r 137E

If the finding is that you did not commit a breach, you must be paid the reasonable expenses you incurred defending the charge at the inquiry, as fixed by the FES Commissioner (r 137E).

7If a breach is found: what can happenIf a breach is found, the Commissioner can take disciplinary action, improvement action, both, or none. Disciplinary action ranges from a caution or a fine of up to 5 days’ pay, through demotion or a transfer, to dismissal.r 96, r 137D

The FES Commissioner must decide to take disciplinary action, improvement action, both, or no action (r 137D). "Disciplinary action" is one or more of (r 96):

Disciplinary actionLimit
A caution
A fineUp to the pay you received for your last 5 days at work before the finding
Reduction in rank, class or status
A transferTo a district or workplace other than the one where the conduct happened
Termination of employment
A cautionLimit:
A fineLimit: Up to the pay you received for your last 5 days at work before the finding
Reduction in rank, class or statusLimit:
A transferLimit: To a district or workplace other than the one where the conduct happened
Termination of employmentLimit:

A fine must be paid to the FES Commissioner and can be recovered as a debt (r 142).

8Appeals: two levels, 7 days eachThere are two levels of appeal, and each has a 7-day deadline. A delegate’s decision goes to the FES Commissioner; the Commissioner’s decision goes to the Appeal Board. You can appeal the finding, the penalty, or both.r 137F, r 137G
Who made the decisionAppeal toDeadlineSource
A delegate of the FES CommissionerThe FES Commissioner7 days after you receive noticer 137F(2)–(3)
The FES Commissioner (including on an appeal from a delegate)The Appeal Board7 days after you receive noticer 137G(2)–(3)
A delegate of the FES CommissionerAppeal to: The FES Commissioner
Deadline
7 days after you receive notice
Source
r 137F(2)–(3)
The FES Commissioner (including on an appeal from a delegate)Appeal to: The Appeal Board
Deadline
7 days after you receive notice
Source
r 137G(2)–(3)

You can appeal against the finding that you committed a breach, against the action taken, or both (r 137F(1), r 137G(1)). The grounds are "innocence of the disciplinary charge or excessive severity of the action taken" (r 138(2)(h)).

The notice of appeal must give details of the decision, set out the grounds, and be signed by you or your representative (r 137H(2)). It must be given to the FES Commissioner personally or by registered post (r 137H(3)). An email may not be enough.

9The Appeal BoardThe Appeal Board has three members. A magistrate, or someone qualified to be one, chairs it, and your union nominates one member. It decides by majority and follows criminal appeal procedure as nearly as practicable.r 137I

The Appeal Board is a chairperson and 2 members appointed by the FES Commissioner (r 137I(1)):

(a) the chairperson must be a magistrate or, if a magistrate is unable or unwilling to act, a person qualified to be appointed as one (r 137I(2));

(b) one member must be nominated by your union, or by you if you are not a member of a union (r 137I(3));

(c) it decides by majority (r 139(7)).

The procedure follows, as nearly as practicable, Part 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2004 (WA) and Part 2 of the Criminal Appeals Act 2004 (WA), subject to the chairperson's directions (r 139(4)). People can be summoned to give evidence (r 139(6)).

10How the appeal runsA time for deciding the appeal must be set within 28 days of the Commissioner receiving your notice, with at least 7 days’ notice of the hearing. The Board can confirm, vary or set aside the decision and substitute its own. It can also award you your reasonable expenses.r 138

For an appeal at either level (r 138(2)):

(a) the appeal body must appoint a time for determining the appeal, and that time must be within 28 days of the FES Commissioner receiving the notice of appeal (r 138(2)(a)–(b));

(b) the parties get at least 7 days' written notice of the hearing (r 138(2)(c));

(c) the appeal body may confirm, vary or set aside the finding or decision, and substitute its own (r 138(2)(d)); if it sets aside the finding, it must also set aside the action based on it (r 138(2)(e));

(d) it may award you the reasonable expenses of conducting your case (r 138(2)(g)).

11If a step is missedIf a step in the process is missed or done late, the chairperson of the Appeal Board can fix it and enlarge the time. That power covers a missed deadline on either side. It is a discretion, so do not rely on it.r 140

If anything required by r 136, 137, 137A, 137C, 137F, 137G, 137H, 138 or 139 is not done, or not done in the right way or within the time, the chairperson of the Appeal Board may take appropriate measures to rectify the omission, validate the irregularity and enlarge the time (r 140). That power covers your missed deadline, and also the Department's.

12After a criminal convictionIf you are convicted of a serious offence, the Commissioner can take disciplinary action after giving you a chance to make a submission. That action is disciplinary. But it is not on the list of decisions that can go to the Appeal Board.r 141

If an employee is convicted or found guilty of a serious offence (broadly, an indictable offence, wherever committed), the FES Commissioner may take disciplinary action, improvement action, both, or none, after giving the employee an opportunity to make a submission (r 141(1)–(3)). This decision is not one of the "appellable decisions" listed for the Appeal Board (r 137G(1)).

Why a WA unfair dismissal claim is usually not available

In most WA state-system jobs, an employee who is dismissed can refer a claim that the dismissal was "harsh, oppressive or unfair" to the WAIRC within 28 days (IR Act s 29(1)(c), s 29(2)(a)). See our page on WA unfair dismissal.

Read moreShow less

For DFES operational staff, s 23(3)(d) of the IR Act gets in the way. In plain terms, it says the Commission must not regulate suspension, discipline, dismissal, termination or reinstatement of an employee if:

(a) another Act (including regulations made under it) provides for that matter; and

(b) that other Act also provides for an appeal in a matter of that kind (s 23(3)(d)).

The Fire Brigades Regulations do both. They set out the FES Commissioner's disciplinary powers, they list termination as a form of disciplinary action (r 96), and they give an appeal to the Appeal Board (r 137G). In [2023] WAIRC 00399 the Commission recorded that it was "not in dispute" that the regulations "set out the FES Commissioner's powers to discipline firefighters and provide an avenue for appeal" ([47]), and held that "s 23(3)(d) of the IR Act operates to prevent the Commission from regulating discipline in relation to firefighters" ([49]).

That case was a dispute brought by the union under s 44, not an unfair dismissal claim. But the same reasoning applies to a dismissal: if DFES terminates your employment as disciplinary action under r 96, the WAIRC very likely cannot hear an unfair dismissal claim about it, and your remedy is the appeal under the regulations. That is why the 7-day deadline matters so much.

The Public Service Arbitrator and the Public Service Appeal Board were abolished on 31 January 2025, when Part IIA of the IR Act was deleted (IR Act Part IIA, ss 80C–80S and 80U–80W, deleted by No. 43 of 2024 s 57). Older advice that points you to either body is out of date.

Terminations with no appeal under the regulations: the law is unsettled

Not every termination is disciplinary action, and not every disciplinary termination can be appealed. Examples include:

Read moreShow less

(a) a medical retirement, or a termination because you can no longer do the work;

(b) not renewing, or ending, an engagement for a fixed period of up to 5 years (FES Act s 21(4)(b));

(c) disciplinary action, including termination, taken after a criminal conviction under r 141, which has no listed appeal to the Appeal Board (r 137G(1)).

Whether a WAIRC unfair dismissal claim is open for these is not settled. One view is that s 23(3)(d) only bites where the other Act provides an appeal "in a matter of that kind", so a termination the regulations give no appeal against stays within s 29(1)(c). The other view is that the regulations cover termination as a subject, so the bar applies anyway. We have not found a published decision on this point for firefighters. A member in this position should get advice quickly and, to be safe, lodge within 28 days.

Other routes that may still be open

Damaging action: punished for raising a complaint

Part 6B of the IR Act protects you from damaging action because you are able to make an employment-related inquiry or complaint, to DFES or to someone else (s 97A(1)). Damaging action includes dismissal, altering your position to your disadvantage, refusing to promote or transfer you, otherwise injuring you in your employment, or threatening any of these (s 97).

Read moreShow less

How it works:

(a) you prove the damaging action; then DFES must prove it did not act because you made or proposed to make the inquiry or complaint (s 97A(2));

(b) the claim goes to the Industrial Magistrates Court, within 6 years (s 82A, s 83E);

(c) the court can order reinstatement after a dismissal and compensation for loss or injury (s 97B(2)), and civil penalties of up to $93,000 for a body corporate ($930,000 for a serious contravention) and $18,000 for an individual ($180,000 if serious) (s 83E(1));

(d) a person "involved in" the contravention, such as a manager, can also be liable (s 83E(1A)–(1B)).

Two points are untested for firefighters. First, s 23(3)(d) limits "the Commission", and whether it reaches a claim in the Industrial Magistrates Court about a disciplinary decision has not been decided. Second, the court must not make orders if you have sought relief "under another provision of this Act or any other written law" for the same damaging action, unless that claim was withdrawn or failed for want of jurisdiction (s 97B(5)). An appeal to the Appeal Board under the regulations may count as such a claim. Think about both before you file anything.

Our damaging action page explains the claim in full.

Discrimination: the Equal Opportunity Act 1984

The Equal Opportunity Act 1984 (WA) makes it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against an employee on grounds including impairment and age, for example by dismissing the employee or subjecting them to any other detriment (s 66B(2), s 66W). A complaint goes to the Commissioner for Equal Opportunity within 12 months, or later on good cause (s 83(4)–(5)). Your union can lodge the complaint on your behalf (s 83(1)(c)). If it goes to the State Administrative Tribunal, damages are capped at $40,000 (s 127(b)(i)).

Two exceptions matter most for firefighters:

(a) impairment: it is not unlawful to refuse employment or to dismiss someone because of an impairment if it is reasonable for the employer to conclude, after taking all reasonable steps to get the relevant medical information, that the person would be unable to carry out work reasonably required, or would need services or facilities that impose unjustifiable hardship (s 66Q(1));

(b) age: terms imposed "to comply with health and safety considerations which are reasonable in the circumstances" are not unlawful (s 66ZM(1)), and voluntary retirement or severance schemes may be offered by age (s 66ZN(1)).

Both exceptions turn on evidence. An employer that relies on a general assumption about a condition or an age, rather than the individual's medical evidence, may not be able to use them. See our discrimination page.

Enforcing the agreement or award

If DFES does not give you something the agreement, the award or the minimum conditions require, you, your union or an industrial inspector can apply to the Industrial Magistrates Court to enforce it (IR Act s 83(1)), within 6 years (s 82A). Unpaid entitlements can be ordered back. This is a claim about entitlements, not a review of a disciplinary decision.

Bullying and sexual harassment

Since the 2024 amendments, a worker who reasonably believes they have been bullied at work can apply to the WAIRC for a stop bullying order (IR Act s 29(1)(e), s 51BJ). The Commission must start dealing with it within 14 days (s 51BK(1)), and cannot order compensation (s 51BM(3)). Reasonable management action carried out in a reasonable manner is not bullying (s 51BI(2)), and a disciplinary process can be reasonable management action.

A person sexually harassed in connection with work can apply for a stop sexual harassment order, refer the matter to the Commission, or both (s 29(1)(f), s 51BT(1)). The Commission may dismiss a proceeding started more than 24 months after the last alleged incident (s 51BU). See bullying and sexual harassment (WA).

Workers' compensation, and stress claims about discipline

If you are injured or become ill at work, see our page on cancer, PTSD and workers' compensation. Two points connect it with discipline:

(a) a psychological injury is not compensable if it results wholly or predominantly from reasonable administrative action, which includes suspension and disciplinary action, unless that action was "unreasonable and harsh on the part of the employer" (Workers Compensation and Injury Management Act 2023 s 7);

(b) for 12 months after an injured worker first becomes incapacitated, the employer must not dismiss the worker solely or mainly because of the incapacity, and must give 28 days' notice in the approved form before dismissing for any reason (s 168(2)–(4)). A lawful dismissal ends the obligation to keep your position open (s 166(3)).

Case study
Discrimination complaint failedState Administrative Tribunal · 5 November 2009

Colour vision and the recruit medical: the tribunal accepted DFES's predecessor's risk case

On his fourth application, a candidate reached the final medical stage and learned he was colour vision deficient. FESA paid for a practical firefighting colour test in Sydney, which he failed, and rejected him. The tribunal held the rejection lawful.

Read the full storyShow less

The candidate had applied four times; at the final stage, a pre-employment health assessment found he was colour vision deficient ([1]-[2]). An optometrist gave the wrong test and the wrong conclusion, and FESA then paid for him to sit a clinical test in Sydney that simulated colour-critical firefighting tasks, which it had never done for a candidate before ([2]). He failed it, his diagnosis as "strongly deuteranomal" was confirmed, and FESA rejected him as medically unfit ([3]). He had already been sent for a uniform fitting, which he took as a sign he would be accepted ([4]).

He complained to the Commissioner for Equal Opportunity on 10 July 2007, and the complaint was referred to the tribunal on 6 December 2007 ([16]). FESA admitted that it had directly discriminated against him in deciding who would be offered employment, but relied on the exception for impairment in s 66Q of the Equal Opportunity Act 1984 (WA) ([6], [355] finding 3).

The tribunal found that colour is "a critical component of the inherent firefighting duties", and that his deficiency posed an unacceptable risk to himself, other firefighters and the public ([8]). The practical test was "a fair and practical means of objectively assessing" his individual capacity ([10]). FESA "had sufficient regard" to his individual circumstances and could reasonably conclude he could not do the work ([355] finding 6). The indirect discrimination claim also failed ([354]), and the application was dismissed (Order).

What it means for you

The exception lets an employer refuse a job because of an impairment where, having taken all reasonable steps to get the relevant information, it is reasonable to conclude that the person could not carry out the work reasonably required, or would need services or facilities that would impose unjustifiable hardship (EO Act s 66Q(1)(a)-(b)). A member or candidate facing a medical exclusion may be able to ask for an individual, task-based assessment rather than a blanket rule; here FESA's offer of one weighed in its favour ([9]-[10]).

Outcome: Dismissed: complaint of impairment discrimination failed (for FESA).

Trainee firefighters

Trainee Firefighter is the first classification in the agreement; a trainee progresses to 5th Class on attaining the trainee skills and competencies (WES335 cl 12(2)(a)(i)). On the text:

Read moreShow less

(a) a trainee engaged as operational staff is an "employee" under the regulations (r 96), so the disciplinary code and its appeals apply to a trainee who is charged;

(b) if a trainee is engaged for a fixed period (FES Act s 21(4)(b)) and is not kept on, that is probably not disciplinary action, and the unsettled question above applies;

(c) a trainee who fails a medical standard may have an Equal Opportunity Act complaint, subject to the s 66Q exception, and the employer must have taken reasonable steps to get the medical facts.

We have not confirmed whether DFES engages trainees on fixed terms, or whether trainees are operational staff from their first day of the trainee school. Check your letter of offer.

Defence base and airport firefighters: the Fair Work system

Firefighters employed by Ventia on Defence sites in WA, and by Airservices Australia at airports, are not DFES employees. Ventia is a company and Airservices is a Commonwealth authority, so both are national system employers (FW Act s 14(1)). Their crews work under federal enterprise agreements: the Ventia Fire and Rescue Enterprise Agreement 2023 (AE523802) and the Airservices Australia (Aviation Rescue and Fire Fighting) Enterprise Agreement 2024-2027 (AE525449). The Fire Brigades Regulations do not apply to them.

Read moreShow less

For these crews:

(a) unfair dismissal: apply to the Fair Work Commission within 21 days after the dismissal takes effect (s 394(2)(a)); you must have completed the minimum employment period of 6 months (12 months for a small business employer) and be covered by an award or enterprise agreement, or earn under the high income threshold (s 382, s 383); late applications need exceptional circumstances (s 394(3));

(b) general protections: an employer must not take adverse action, including dismissal, because of a protected attribute such as a physical or mental disability or age (s 351(1)), or because you have or exercised a workplace right (s 340(1)); a dismissal claim must be lodged within 21 days (s 366(1)(a)); there is no minimum employment period, and it can be brought by a recruit in training.

See our pages on unfair dismissal and general protections. The 21-day limit is shorter than the WA 28 days, and it is the deadline that catches federal-system crews who have been told about the WA rules.

Your options by situation

Your situationForumTime limitWhat you can getSource
DFES charged you with a breach of disciplineFES Commissioner's inquiryReply within 7 working daysFinding of no breach; your reasonable defence expensesFBR r 137A, r 137C, r 137E
A delegate found a breach or took action against youAppeal to the FES Commissioner7 daysFinding or action confirmed, varied or set asideFBR r 137F, r 138
The FES Commissioner found a breach, took action (including dismissal), or decided your first appealAppeal Board (magistrate chair, one union nominee)7 days; hearing fixed within 28 daysFinding or action confirmed, varied or set aside; reasonable expensesFBR r 137G, r 137I, r 138
You missed an appeal deadlineAsk the Appeal Board chairpersonAs soon as possibleTime enlarged, irregularity validatedFBR r 140
You were dismissed other than by appealable disciplinary action (medical, end of fixed term, after a conviction under r 141)WAIRC unfair dismissal (availability unsettled)28 daysReinstatement, or compensation up to 6 months' remunerationIR Act s 29(1)(c), s 29(2)(a), s 23A(6)–(8)
DFES acted against you because you raised a complaint or inquiryIndustrial Magistrates Court (damaging action)6 yearsReinstatement, uncapped compensation, penaltiesIR Act s 97A, s 97B, s 83E, s 82A
You were treated worse because of impairment, age or another groundCommissioner for Equal Opportunity, then the State Administrative Tribunal12 monthsConciliation; damages up to $40,000EO Act s 66B, s 83, s 127
DFES did not pay or give an entitlement under the agreement or awardIndustrial Magistrates Court6 yearsUnpaid amounts, penaltiesIR Act s 83, s 82A
You are being bullied at workWAIRC stop bullying orderNone fixedOrders to stop the bullying; no compensationIR Act s 29(1)(e), s 51BJ, s 51BM
You were sexually harassed in connection with workWAIRCMay be dismissed after 24 monthsStop orders; on a referral, orders including compensationIR Act s 29(1)(f), s 51BT, s 51BU, s 51BZ
You were injured and dismissed within 12 monthsWorkCover WA process; offences under the ActWithin the 12-month obligation periodPosition kept open; 28 days' notice before dismissalWCIM Act s 166, s 168
You are a Ventia or Airservices firefighter and were dismissedFair Work Commission21 daysReinstatement or compensation (unfair dismissal); orders and compensation (general protections)FW Act s 394, s 366, s 351
DFES charged you with a breach of disciplineForum: FES Commissioner's inquiry
Time limit
Reply within 7 working days
What you can get
Finding of no breach; your reasonable defence expenses
Source
FBR r 137A, r 137C, r 137E
A delegate found a breach or took action against youForum: Appeal to the FES Commissioner
Time limit
7 days
What you can get
Finding or action confirmed, varied or set aside
Source
FBR r 137F, r 138
The FES Commissioner found a breach, took action (including dismissal), or decided your first appealForum: Appeal Board (magistrate chair, one union nominee)
Time limit
7 days; hearing fixed within 28 days
What you can get
Finding or action confirmed, varied or set aside; reasonable expenses
Source
FBR r 137G, r 137I, r 138
You missed an appeal deadlineForum: Ask the Appeal Board chairperson
Time limit
As soon as possible
What you can get
Time enlarged, irregularity validated
Source
FBR r 140
Show all 12 rowsShow fewer
You were dismissed other than by appealable disciplinary action (medical, end of fixed term, after a conviction under r 141)Forum: WAIRC unfair dismissal (availability unsettled)
Time limit
28 days
What you can get
Reinstatement, or compensation up to 6 months' remuneration
Source
IR Act s 29(1)(c), s 29(2)(a), s 23A(6)–(8)
DFES acted against you because you raised a complaint or inquiryForum: Industrial Magistrates Court (damaging action)
Time limit
6 years
What you can get
Reinstatement, uncapped compensation, penalties
Source
IR Act s 97A, s 97B, s 83E, s 82A
You were treated worse because of impairment, age or another groundForum: Commissioner for Equal Opportunity, then the State Administrative Tribunal
Time limit
12 months
What you can get
Conciliation; damages up to $40,000
Source
EO Act s 66B, s 83, s 127
DFES did not pay or give an entitlement under the agreement or awardForum: Industrial Magistrates Court
Time limit
6 years
What you can get
Unpaid amounts, penalties
Source
IR Act s 83, s 82A
You are being bullied at workForum: WAIRC stop bullying order
Time limit
None fixed
What you can get
Orders to stop the bullying; no compensation
Source
IR Act s 29(1)(e), s 51BJ, s 51BM
You were sexually harassed in connection with workForum: WAIRC
Time limit
May be dismissed after 24 months
What you can get
Stop orders; on a referral, orders including compensation
Source
IR Act s 29(1)(f), s 51BT, s 51BU, s 51BZ
You were injured and dismissed within 12 monthsForum: WorkCover WA process; offences under the Act
Time limit
Within the 12-month obligation period
What you can get
Position kept open; 28 days' notice before dismissal
Source
WCIM Act s 166, s 168
You are a Ventia or Airservices firefighter and were dismissedForum: Fair Work Commission
Time limit
21 days
What you can get
Reinstatement or compensation (unfair dismissal); orders and compensation (general protections)
Source
FW Act s 394, s 366, s 351

For unions and industrial officers

The same research agent can work through your members' agreement, its history in the Commission, and the decisions on it.

Decided cases

What the Commission and the courts decided.

Published decisions, retold in plain English from the decision itself. Each links to the full text. Lawcaptain did not act in these cases.

Application dismissedWestern Australian Industrial Relations Commission · 27 July 2023

"Please explain": why the Commission could not pause a firefighter's discipline

In February 2023 the FES Commissioner sent a senior firefighter a "please explain" letter about a comment he had posted on the union's Facebook page. The letter said the comment might be a breach of the Fire Brigades Regulations and asked for an explanation before the Commissioner decided what, if any, action to take.

Read the full storyShow less

In February 2023 the FES Commissioner sent a senior firefighter a "please explain" letter about a comment he had posted on the union's Facebook page ([2], [15]). The letter said the comment might be a breach of the Fire Brigades Regulations and asked for an explanation before the Commissioner decided what, if any, action to take ([2]). The union said the comment was aimed at the union, not at DFES, and that a formal process was an unnecessary escalation ([3], [15], [17]). It asked the Commission for a compulsory conference under s 44 and for the disciplinary process to be paused ([17]).

DFES objected that the Commission had no jurisdiction because of s 23(3)(d) of the IR Act ([4]). Commissioner Emmanuel agreed. The regulations set out the FES Commissioner's powers to discipline firefighters and an avenue for appeal ([47]), so s 23(3)(d) "operates to prevent the Commission from regulating discipline in relation to firefighters" ([49]). Pausing the process, or stopping the FES Commissioner from treating the matter as disciplinary, would be regulating discipline ([56]–[57]). Earlier conferences held without objection did not help, because parties cannot give the Commission jurisdiction the Act takes away ([55]). Whether the post was a breach at all was left for the disciplinary process to decide ([58]). The application was dismissed ([59]).

What it means for you

once the FES Commissioner has begun, or is considering, a disciplinary process, the place to contest it is the process itself and the appeal under the regulations, not the WAIRC.

Application dismissedWestern Australian Industrial Relations Commission · 12 August 2026

The same rule for police, even before any charge

The police union said officers had been told they would face a conduct report and possible discipline if they took a rest day on a public holiday without approval. It asked the Commission to have the Commissioner of Police issue a broadcast that officers would not be disciplined for using their entitlements.

Read the full storyShow less

The police union said officers had been told they would face a conduct report and possible discipline if they took a rest day on a public holiday without approval ([35]–[36]). It asked the Commission to have the Commissioner of Police issue a broadcast that officers would not be disciplined for using their entitlements ([7]). The union argued that s 23(3)(d) only applies once a disciplinary process has formally started, and that the firefighters' decision should not be followed because it was a single commissioner's ([18]–[20], [28]).

Commissioner Walkington held that orders restricting the employer's decisions about whether to start disciplinary action would themselves "regulate" discipline ([53]). The Commission noted the union "may be correct" about the entitlement to rest days, but could not grant the relief sought ([56]). The Commissioner "respectfully" adopted the reasoning in the firefighters' case ([59]) and dismissed the application ([60]).

What it means for you

the bar in s 23(3)(d) applies before a charge is laid, not only after. A dispute about an entitlement is better framed as a claim to enforce the entitlement than as a request to stop discipline.

Show more case studies (3)Show fewer
Four-week stay of the relocationWestern Australian Industrial Relations Commission · 26 March 2021

What the Commission can still do: an operational move, not discipline

DFES decided to move an urban tanker appliance and at least 12 firefighters to crew it from Canning Vale to the new Cockburn station. The union said there had been no genuine consultation and sought interim orders.

Read the full storyShow less

DFES decided to move an urban tanker appliance and at least 12 firefighters to crew it from Canning Vale to the new Cockburn station ([1]–[2]). The union said there had been no genuine consultation and sought interim orders ([3]–[4]). The Commission found the documentation of the industrial relations considerations "almost non-existent" and what existed "cursory and dismissive of the Union's concerns" ([47]), and that the consultation could not be said to be genuine ([48]). Because DFES regarded consultation as over, an order was "necessary to preserve the status quo" ([54]). The Commission stayed the transfer or relocation of staff for four weeks to allow conciliation ([57]), while noting that consultation "cannot enable a veto" ([56]).

What it means for you

this was an operational decision about crewing, not discipline, and s 23(3)(d) was not raised. A transfer imposed as disciplinary action under r 96 would be treated differently.

Claim dismissedWAIRC Full Bench · 11 November 2025

Pressuring a witness through his wife: unfair dismissal claim thrown out (not a firefighter case)

A long-serving DBCA overseer was dismissed and filed an unfair dismissal claim. He then sent a former colleague, a likely witness, a message through the colleague's wife saying he might face embarrassing questions in court if he did not talk. The Full Bench ended the claim.

Read the full storyShow less

He had been employed since 1999 as an "overseer/crew header" in the Wellington District, was dismissed on 1 February 2024 after allegations of breaches of discipline, and filed a claim on 27 February 2024 ([1]). The department applied under s 27(1)(a) of the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA) to have the claim dismissed because he had tried to influence a likely witness ([2]).

The colleague had told him in 2023 that he wanted to stay out of it, and then blocked his number ([11], [38]). After filing his claim, he called the colleague's wife twice and then texted her ([5], [39]). The Commissioner at first instance found that he was "bluntly informing" the colleague that he would be a witness and might face embarrassing questions ([9]), but held there was no coercion or intimidation and refused the application ([13]).

The Full Bench held that test was too narrow: the question is "improper conduct of any kind" that tends to induce a witness to give false evidence or none, with or without threats ([26]-[28]). The message was an ultimatum, which he conceded ([12], [36]); sending it through the wife "added to the improper pressure" ([37]); and his earlier messages had an "increasingly belligerent and aggressive tone" ([38]). It was "improper conduct and an attempt to interfere with the proper processes and proceedings of the Commission" ([42]). The Full Bench quashed the decision and dismissed the unfair dismissal claim ([43]).

What it means for you

Once a dispute is in a tribunal, the test is "improper conduct of any kind" that may tend to make a witness give false evidence or none, whether or not there are threats ([26]-[28]), and pressure through a family member was treated as worse ([37]). A member with a claim on foot may want to leave all contact with witnesses to the lawyer or union official running the case; the cost here was the whole claim.

Outcome: Won by DBCA: appeal upheld, and the dismissed employee's unfair dismissal claim was dismissed without a hearing on its merits.

Reinstatement overturnedWAIRC Full Bench · 22 December 2023

A dismissal for refusing a direction, compared with a colleague treated more leniently: the Full Bench overturned reinstatement (not a firefighter case)

A prison drug detection officer was dismissed in May 2022 for refusing the employer's COVID-19 vaccination direction. A colleague at the same prison who also refused was later only reprimanded. The Senior Commissioner reinstated the officer on that basis; the Full Bench held the comparison should not have been made.

Read the full storyShow less

She was dismissed for refusing a direction to be vaccinated, after a disciplinary process under the Public Sector Management Act 1994 (WA) ([5], [30]-[42]). The Senior Commissioner found there was a valid reason, but that her dismissal was unfair when compared with a colleague, and ordered reinstatement ([13]-[14]). The colleague's case was finished only after the health directions were lifted, about nine months after the dismissal, with a reprimand ([48]-[49]).

Commissioner Kucera, with whom the other members agreed, held that whether a dismissal was harsh, oppressive or unfair is judged on "the facts or circumstances that were in existence at the time of the dismissal" ([78]). The employer had no advance notice that the directions would be lifted and was entitled to proceed when it did ([84]-[85], [90]). Considering the colleague's later outcome was an error ([92]).

The colleague was also the wrong comparison: she did a materially different, mostly computer-based job, worked for a different public sector employer, and was not under the Prisons Act ([105]-[109]). The right comparison was the nine other prison officers dismissed for the same refusal before the directions were lifted, and against them "the respondent's treatment was the same and so, was not unfair" ([112]-[113]). The appeal was upheld and the decision quashed ([2]).

What it means for you

An argument that "someone else got off lighter" works only with a true comparison: the same kind of job, the same rules, and treatment at the same time. A member making that argument may need evidence about the comparison officers that existed when the decision about the member was made.

Outcome: Won by the employer: appeal upheld and the order reinstating the officer quashed. A further appeal to the Industrial Appeal Court was dismissed ([2024] WASCA 167, also published as [2025] WAIRC 00014).

Worked examples

How it plays out, step by step.

Illustrative example, not a real case

A disciplinary charge arrives on a Monday

A Station Officer is handed a disciplinary charge on Monday 9 November 2026. This is what the Fire Brigades Regulations 1943 (WA) set out, step by step.

Walk through itShow less
  1. The reply: 7 working days. The charge must come with a written notice to reply in writing "within 7 working days after receiving the copy of the charge" (r 137A(1)). The regulations do not define "working days". Counting Monday to Friday, starting the day after the charge arrives and with no public holiday that fortnight, the last day is Wednesday 18 November 2026. The reply must say whether the charge is admitted or denied, and be signed by the Station Officer or the representative (r 137A(2)). If no reply is made in time, the charge is taken to be denied (r 137A(3)).
  2. Representation. During an investigation a union member is entitled to be represented by a union advocate (r 136(5)(a)), and may be represented by one at the inquiry or any appeal (r 139(1A), (1)(a)).
  3. The inquiry. The FES Commissioner must hold an inquiry as soon as practicable, give at least 7 days' written notice of when and where, and provide copies of the documents to be used (r 137C(1)-(2)). At the end, the FES Commissioner must find that there was, or was not, a breach of discipline, and give written notice of the finding (r 137C(4)-(5)).
  4. An appeal: 7 days. Suppose notice of an adverse decision by the FES Commissioner arrives on Sunday 29 November 2026. Written notice of appeal to the Appeal Board must be given to the FES Commissioner "within 7 days after receiving notice" (r 137G(3)); for a delegate's decision the appeal goes to the FES Commissioner on the same timing (r 137F(3)). Counting from the next day, seven days ends on Sunday 6 December 2026. Because that day is a Sunday, the period runs to Monday 7 December 2026 (r 2A). Rule 2A names Sundays, bank holidays and public holidays, not Saturdays. The notice must give details of the decision, set out the grounds, be signed, and be given personally or by registered post (r 137H).
  5. If the deadline is missed. The chairperson of the Appeal Board may enlarge the time and validate irregularities (r 140), but this is a discretion, so a member in this position may want to ask at once and explain the delay.
  6. Why not the WAIRC? Because the regulations set out the FES Commissioner's disciplinary powers and an appeal, s 23(3)(d) of the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA) stops the Commission regulating discipline of firefighters ([2023] WAIRC 00399 at [49]). The regulations are the route.

The day counts are our working. The regulations do not say whether the day of receipt counts, so a member may want to treat the earlier date as the deadline.

Questions

The things people ask.

Can the WAIRC hear an unfair dismissal claim if DFES dismisses me for misconduct?

Very probably not. A dismissal for a breach of discipline is "disciplinary action" under r 96 of the Fire Brigades Regulations, and the regulations give an appeal to the Appeal Board. Section 23(3)(d) of the IR Act stops the Commission regulating dismissal in that situation, and the Commission has held that it prevents the Commission "from regulating discipline in relation to firefighters" ([2023] WAIRC 00399 at [49]). The route is an appeal under the regulations within 7 days.

How long do I have to appeal a disciplinary decision?

7 days after you receive notice of the finding or decision, whether you appeal from a delegate to the FES Commissioner (r 137F(3)) or from the FES Commissioner to the Appeal Board (r 137G(3)). The notice must be in writing, give details and grounds, be signed, and be given personally or by registered post (r 137H).

What if I miss the 7 days?

The chairperson of the Appeal Board may enlarge the time and validate irregularities (r 140). It is a discretion, not a right, so ask straight away and explain the delay.

Who sits on the Appeal Board?

A chairperson, who must be a magistrate or a person qualified to be one, and 2 members, all appointed by the FES Commissioner. One member must be nominated by your union, or by you if you are not a member (r 137I). The Board decides by majority (r 139(7)).

Can I have a union representative?

Yes. You are entitled to a union advocate during an investigation (r 136(5)(a)), and at the inquiry and any appeal (r 139(1)(a)). During an investigation, if you are not a union member, a person approved by the FES Commissioner can represent you (r 136(5)(b)). At the inquiry or appeal, another representative approved by the presiding authority is allowed only if the union advocate refuses to act, or if union membership is not available to you because of your employment (r 139(1)(a)).

Can I be suspended without pay?

Yes, but only if the alleged breach is such that you should not continue performing your duty (r 137(1)). If no charge is made, the charge is withdrawn or you are cleared, the suspension must be lifted and withheld pay restored (r 137(3), (5)).

What penalties can DFES impose?

A caution, a fine of up to your last 5 days' pay, reduction in rank, class or status, a transfer, or termination (r 96), as well as or instead of improvement action such as counselling or a warning (r 137D).

If I am cleared, who pays my costs?

If the inquiry finds no breach, DFES must pay the reasonable expenses you incurred defending the charge at the inquiry, as fixed by the FES Commissioner (r 137E). On an appeal, the appeal body may award you reasonable expenses (r 138(2)(g)).

Can I bring a damaging action claim instead?

Possibly, if DFES acted against you because you made or proposed to make an employment-related inquiry or complaint (IR Act s 97A). It goes to the Industrial Magistrates Court within 6 years. Whether it can be used against a disciplinary decision, and how it interacts with an Appeal Board appeal (s 97B(5)), is untested, so get advice before choosing.

I am a Ventia or Airservices firefighter. Do these rules apply to me?

No. You are in the federal Fair Work system. An unfair dismissal or general protections dismissal claim must be lodged with the Fair Work Commission within 21 days (FW Act s 394(2)(a), s 366(1)(a)).

Can I claim workers' compensation for stress caused by a disciplinary process?

Usually not, if the stress results wholly or predominantly from reasonable disciplinary or suspension action. A claim can succeed if the action was "unreasonable and harsh on the part of the employer" (WCIM Act s 7(2)).

Does the Public Service Appeal Board still exist?

No. It and the Public Service Arbitrator were abolished on 31 January 2025, when Part IIA of the IR Act was deleted. General information only, not legal advice. Time limits are short: if you have been charged, suspended or dismissed, get advice from your union or a lawyer straight away.

More for WA firefighters

We use our software to generate this content with AI assistance. General information about the law, not legal advice. Last checked 1 November 2026.